Developer Tools · head to head
Steampipe vs Terragrunt

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Steampipe and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Steampipe | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, with paid hosting through Turbot Pipes | Unknown |
| Platforms | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Terragrunt
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Terragrunt
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Terragrunt
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Steampipe
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Steampipe
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Steampipe
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is Steampipe or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Steampipe starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Steampipe or Terragrunt?
- Steampipe starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does Steampipe or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use Steampipe for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Steampipe best used for?
- Steampipe is most often used for security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly export, compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is asked, inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one query, engineers who would rather write sql than learn each provider command line tool. Of those, security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly export and compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is asked are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can Steampipe do that Terragrunt cannot?
- Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
Terragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceSteampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
Terragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceSteampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs JFrog Artifactory
- Steampipe vs Namespace
- Steampipe vs Nix
- Steampipe vs Nixpacks
- Steampipe vs Octopus Deploy
- Steampipe vs Okteto
- Steampipe vs Pulumi
- Steampipe vs Infracost
- Steampipe vs Packer
- Steampipe vs Serverless Framework
- Steampipe vs SST
- Steampipe vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Steampipe vs Cerebrium
- Steampipe vs Go
- Steampipe vs Rancher
- Steampipe vs Anyscale
- Steampipe vs Linkerd
- Steampipe vs Microsoft Azure
- Steampipe vs Nitric
- Steampipe vs OpenEBS
- Steampipe vs OVHcloud
- Steampipe vs Nomad
- Steampipe vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Atlantis
- Terragrunt vs Jitsu
- Terragrunt vs Frappe
- Terragrunt vs Visual Studio Code
- Terragrunt vs Penpot
- Terragrunt vs GNU Emacs
- Terragrunt vs Bazel
- Terragrunt vs Eclipse IDE
- Terragrunt vs Pants Build
- Terragrunt vs Swagger UI
- Terragrunt vs Ansible
- Terragrunt vs Helix
- Terragrunt vs JFrog Artifactory
- Terragrunt vs Namespace
- Terragrunt vs Nix
- Terragrunt vs Nixpacks
- Terragrunt vs Octopus Deploy
- Terragrunt vs Okteto
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant
