Softwr
Steampipe logo

Steampipe

Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step

As of 31 August 2026, Steampipe has a free plan and paid plans start at $49/month. An AGPL-licensed engine that makes cloud provider APIs queryable as Postgres tables, from a bootstrapped fifteen-person company, with a breaking unbundling in its recent history. Softwr lists it under Developer Tools. Steampipe is made by Turbot HQ, Inc, available on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.

Overview

What Steampipe does

Steampipe embeds Postgres and a foreign data wrapper so that cloud provider APIs, SaaS tools, code repositories and configuration files can be queried with ordinary SQL. There is no extract and load step: a query against an AWS plugin calls the AWS API at query time and returns rows. That makes it well suited to security posture questions, compliance evidence and inventory work where the answer must reflect the account right now rather than the last sync. The licensing needs stating precisely because it is often described wrongly. Steampipe moved to AGPL-3.0 in May 2021, roughly four months after it went public, which is years before the Business Source Licence wave that reshaped this category. It is a settled position rather than a recent change of terms. Powerpipe, Flowpipe and Tailpipe are AGPL too; the plugins are Apache 2.0 for code with documentation under a non-commercial licence. Many organisations forbid AGPL outright, and the network clause reaches anyone putting a web interface in front of it. The disruptive event in its history was structural rather than legal. Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were unbundled into a separate product, Powerpipe, and removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands no longer exist. Anyone reading older documentation or a pre-2024 tutorial is reading about a product that has since been split in two.

What people use it for

  • Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly export
  • Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is asked
  • Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one query
  • Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line tool

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Steampipe.

  • AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
  • Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
  • Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
  • The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
  • Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of Steampipe

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • Steampipe logo
    Steampipe
    vs
    Infracost logo
    Infracost

    Infracost: Costing infrastructure from code rather than querying what is deployed

  • Steampipe logo
    Steampipe
    vs
    Grafana logo
    Grafana

    Grafana: Where the requirement is dashboards over existing metrics rather than live API queries

Pricing

What Steampipe costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Steampipe CLI

Free

  • AGPL-3.0
  • All plugins
  • No user or query limits
  • Community support

Pipes Developer

Free

  • One user
  • 400 compute minutes
  • 3GB storage

Pipes Team

$49 /mo

  • Three users
  • 2,000 compute minutes
  • 20GB storage
  • Shared workspaces and role based access

Pipes Enterprise

$249 /mo

  • Three users
  • 10,000 compute minutes
  • 100GB storage
  • SAML and directory sync
  • Additional users charged separately

Capabilities

Features

  • SQL over live APIs

    Cloud and SaaS APIs presented as Postgres tables and queried at request time

  • Wide plugin set

    Over a hundred and fifty data sources across cloud providers, SaaS tools and code

  • Embedded Postgres

    A single binary with the database and foreign data wrapper included

  • Compliance benchmarks

    Security and compliance controls, now delivered through Powerpipe rather than Steampipe

  • Joins across providers

    A single query spanning AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and SaaS tools

  • Hosted option

    Turbot Pipes for shared workspaces, scheduling and access control

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

When did Steampipe become AGPL?

May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.

Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?

Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.

Is it fast on a large cloud estate?

Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.

Does the AGPL affect internal use?

Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.

Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?

It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from Steampipe

Best Developer Tools software for

Compare Steampipe with

Other Developer Tools software

  • Runs Terraform plan and apply from pull request comments, self-hosted and free

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse

    Free, then $99/mo12 researched notes
  • The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud

    Free, then $5/mo12 researched notes
  • Open source design and prototyping platform

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Extensible, customizable free text editor and computing environment

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • Multi-language build system with fast, correct incremental builds

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Open-source, extensible IDE historically centered on Java development

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • Fast, scalable build system with intelligent defaults for Python and more

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Interactive API documentation generated from OpenAPI specs

    Open source8 researched notes
  • Simple, agentless IT automation

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • Post-modern modal text editor for the terminal, written in Rust

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits

    Free, then $100/mo10 researched notes
  • Purely functional package manager and the NixOS distribution built on it, for byte-reproducible environments

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Build system that turns a source directory into an OCI image, now in maintenance mode

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • Runs production-like development environments on your own Kubernetes cluster

    Free plan12 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Steampipe, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on Steampipe

Best Developer Tools software alternatives

Internal developer portal that scores service ownership and maturity rather than just cataloguing services

quote

Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users

Per month by feature flag and environment count

Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner

Per month per team for Dagger Cloud

Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks

Per month by delivered event count

Analytics governance: define a tracking plan, generate typed code from it, and catch drift before release

Per editor seat per month

Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild

Open source, no licence fee

The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud

Per month by site or server

Open source internal developer portal framework created and open sourced by Spotify

Open source, no licence fee

Compare Steampipe with alternatives