Developer Tools · head to head
Steampipe vs Vagrant

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Vagrant covers Box management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Steampipe and Vagrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Vagrant
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Vagrant
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Vagrant
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Steampipe
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Steampipe
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Steampipe
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Steampipe or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Steampipe starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Steampipe or Vagrant?
- Steampipe starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Steampipe or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Steampipe for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Steampipe best used for?
- Steampipe is most often used for security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly export, compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is asked, inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one query, engineers who would rather write sql than learn each provider command line tool. Of those, security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly export and compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is asked are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Steampipe do that Vagrant cannot?
- Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
Vagrant: Is Vagrant free to use?
Vagrant is a free, open-source command-line utility for managing virtual machine lifecycles.
SourceSteampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
Vagrant: Does Vagrant offer a paid tier?
Vagrant itself is free. HashiCorp offers a HCP Vagrant Registry with a free tier for use with Vagrant.
SourceSteampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs JFrog Artifactory
- Steampipe vs Namespace
- Steampipe vs Nix
- Steampipe vs Nixpacks
- Steampipe vs Octopus Deploy
- Steampipe vs Okteto
- Steampipe vs DigitalOcean
- Steampipe vs Neon
- Steampipe vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Steampipe vs Grafana Cloud
- Steampipe vs Pulumi
- Steampipe vs Portworx
- Steampipe vs Serverless Framework
- Steampipe vs Podman
- Steampipe vs Caddy
- Steampipe vs Rancher
- Steampipe vs Infracost
- Steampipe vs Porter
- Steampipe vs SST
- Steampipe vs Tencent Cloud
- Steampipe vs Terragrunt
- Steampipe vs Thanos
- Steampipe vs Zeabur
- Steampipe vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs Atlantis
- Vagrant vs Jitsu
- Vagrant vs Frappe
- Vagrant vs Visual Studio Code
- Vagrant vs Penpot
- Vagrant vs GNU Emacs
- Vagrant vs Bazel
- Vagrant vs Eclipse IDE
- Vagrant vs Pants Build
- Vagrant vs Swagger UI
- Vagrant vs Ansible
- Vagrant vs Helix
- Vagrant vs JFrog Artifactory
- Vagrant vs Namespace
- Vagrant vs Nix
- Vagrant vs Nixpacks
- Vagrant vs Octopus Deploy
- Vagrant vs Okteto
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin

