Developer Tools · head to head
Hookdeck vs Steampipe

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hookdeck pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- They diverge on capability: Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hookdeck and Steampipe actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot Steampipe
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot Steampipe
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot Steampipe
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot Steampipe
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Hookdeck
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Hookdeck
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Hookdeck
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Hookdeck
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone.
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once.
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead.
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate.
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/month
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/month
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Questions people ask
- Is Hookdeck or Steampipe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hookdeck starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hookdeck or Steampipe?
- Hookdeck starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
- Does Hookdeck or Steampipe run on more platforms?
- Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Hookdeck for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hookdeck best used for?
- Hookdeck is most often used for a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled, fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately, debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fix, receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnel. Of those, a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled and fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
- What can Hookdeck do that Steampipe cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations. Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
Hookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
Steampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
Hookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
Steampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Hookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Visual Studio Code
- Hookdeck vs Daytona
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs Ansible
- Hookdeck vs Coder
- Hookdeck vs GitLab CI/CD
- Hookdeck vs HCP Terraform
- Hookdeck vs Helm
- Hookdeck vs Atlantis
- Hookdeck vs Frappe
- Hookdeck vs Penpot
- Hookdeck vs GNU Emacs
- Hookdeck vs Bazel
- Hookdeck vs Eclipse IDE
- Hookdeck vs Pants Build
- Hookdeck vs Swagger UI
- Hookdeck vs Helix
- Hookdeck vs JFrog Artifactory
- Hookdeck vs Namespace
- Hookdeck vs Nix
- Hookdeck vs Nixpacks
- Hookdeck vs Octopus Deploy
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Spacelift
- Steampipe vs Garden
- Steampipe vs Webpack
- Steampipe vs Backstage
- Steampipe vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Steampipe vs Dagger
- Steampipe vs Okteto
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Daytona
- Steampipe vs Harness
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Coder
- Steampipe vs GitLab CI/CD
- Steampipe vs HCP Terraform
- Steampipe vs Helm
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs JFrog Artifactory
- Steampipe vs Namespace
- Steampipe vs Nix
- Steampipe vs Nixpacks
- Steampipe vs Octopus Deploy
