Cloud · head to head
Terragrunt vs Visual Studio Code

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform; Visual Studio Code requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- They diverge on capability: Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Terragrunt and Visual Studio Code actually diverge.
| Attribute | Terragrunt | Visual Studio Code |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | AWS, Azure, GCP | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces) |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
Only in Visual Studio Code
- IntelliSense
- Debugging
- Built-in Git
- Extensions
- Integrated terminal
- Syntax highlighting
- Code refactoring
- Snippets
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Visual Studio Code
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Visual Studio Code
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
- Code editingnot Terragrunt
- Web developmentnot Terragrunt
- Debuggingnot Terragrunt
- Version controlnot Terragrunt
- Remote developmentnot Terragrunt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Visual Studio Code
- Requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- Performance can degrade with very large codebases (100,000+ files)
- Git integration is basic; requires extensions for advanced version control workflows
Pricing, plan by plan
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Visual Studio Code
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Visual Studio Code review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Choose Visual Studio Code if
- You need intellisense.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- You also want debugging.
Questions people ask
- Is Terragrunt or Visual Studio Code better?
- Neither clearly leads. Terragrunt starts at Free and Visual Studio Code at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Terragrunt or Visual Studio Code?
- Terragrunt starts at Free and Visual Studio Code at Free.
- Does Terragrunt or Visual Studio Code run on more platforms?
- Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP. Visual Studio Code runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- Can I use Terragrunt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Terragrunt best used for?
- Terragrunt is most often used for organizing terraform code across multiple environments, automating infrastructure deployment workflows, implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-service. Of those, organizing terraform code across multiple environments and automating infrastructure deployment workflows are not what Visual Studio Code is typically brought in for.
- What can Terragrunt do that Visual Studio Code cannot?
- Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks. Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense, Debugging, Built-in Git, Extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Terragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceVisual Studio Code: Is Visual Studio Code free?
Yes. Visual Studio Code is completely free to use under the MIT license. There are no subscription fees or paid tiers.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceVisual Studio Code: Can I use VS Code for remote development?
Yes. The Remote Development extension pack allows development on remote machines via SSH, in containers, or in Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) while using the full VS Code feature set.
SourceVisual Studio Code: How many extensions are available?
The VS Code Marketplace contains thousands of extensions from Microsoft and the community for language support, debuggers, themes, formatters, and productivity tools.
SourceVisual Studio Code: Does VS Code support debugging?
Yes. VS Code includes built-in debugging for JavaScript, TypeScript, and Node.js, and supports debugging for Python, C++, C#, Java, Ruby, Go, PHP, and other languages via extensions.
SourceVisual Studio Code: What operating systems does VS Code support?
VS Code runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with identical features and keybindings across all platforms.
SourceRelated pages
More on Visual Studio Code
Other head to heads
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Ansible
- Terragrunt vs GoLand
- Terragrunt vs Fig
- Terragrunt vs Turborepo
- Terragrunt vs Harness
- Terragrunt vs Buildkite
- Terragrunt vs Argo CD
- Terragrunt vs GitLab CI/CD
- Terragrunt vs HCP Terraform
- Terragrunt vs Helm
- Terragrunt vs GNU Emacs
- Terragrunt vs Keil MDK
- Terragrunt vs Vite
- Terragrunt vs Bazel
- Terragrunt vs Daytona
- Terragrunt vs Depot
- Terragrunt vs PhpStorm
- Terragrunt vs RubyMine
- Visual Studio Code vs Pulumi
- Visual Studio Code vs Infracost
- Visual Studio Code vs Packer
- Visual Studio Code vs Serverless Framework
- Visual Studio Code vs SST
- Visual Studio Code vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Visual Studio Code vs Cerebrium
- Visual Studio Code vs Go
- Visual Studio Code vs Rancher
- Visual Studio Code vs Anyscale
- Visual Studio Code vs Linkerd
- Visual Studio Code vs Microsoft Azure
- Visual Studio Code vs Nitric
- Visual Studio Code vs OpenEBS
- Visual Studio Code vs OVHcloud
- Visual Studio Code vs Nomad
- Visual Studio Code vs Vagrant
- Visual Studio Code vs Ansible
- Visual Studio Code vs GoLand
- Visual Studio Code vs Fig
- Visual Studio Code vs Turborepo
- Visual Studio Code vs Harness
- Visual Studio Code vs Buildkite
- Visual Studio Code vs Argo CD
- Visual Studio Code vs GitLab CI/CD
- Visual Studio Code vs HCP Terraform
- Visual Studio Code vs Helm
- Visual Studio Code vs GNU Emacs
- Visual Studio Code vs Keil MDK
- Visual Studio Code vs Vite
- Visual Studio Code vs Bazel
- Visual Studio Code vs Daytona
- Visual Studio Code vs Depot
- Visual Studio Code vs PhpStorm
- Visual Studio Code vs RubyMine

