APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Thunder Client

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
APIs
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | web, linux, api | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Thunder Client
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Thunder Client
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Thunder Client
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Kong Gateway
- API Gatewaynot Kong Gateway
- API Testingnot Kong Gateway
- API Documentationnot Kong Gateway
- Microservicesnot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Thunder Client?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceThunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?
Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceThunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?
Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs PocketBase
- Kong Gateway vs Hasura
- Kong Gateway vs Sanity
- Kong Gateway vs Bruno
- Kong Gateway vs Paw
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong Gateway vs HTTPie
- Kong Gateway vs 10x Banking
- Kong Gateway vs Brite Payments
- Kong Gateway vs Bud Financial
- Kong Gateway vs Episode Six
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger
- Thunder Client vs Tyk
- Thunder Client vs Moesif
- Thunder Client vs Treblle
- Thunder Client vs Convoy
- Thunder Client vs Janus Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Gravitee
- Thunder Client vs Strapi
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs GraphQL Apollo
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Payload CMS
- Thunder Client vs Portkey
- Thunder Client vs Prisma
- Thunder Client vs RapidAPI
- Thunder Client vs REST Client VSCode
- Thunder Client vs Rutter
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs Paw
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs HTTPie
- Thunder Client vs 10x Banking
- Thunder Client vs Brite Payments
- Thunder Client vs Bud Financial
- Thunder Client vs Episode Six
- Thunder Client vs Swagger
