APIs · head to head
Kong vs Thunder Client

Thunder Client
APIs
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 2010 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Thunder Client
- API development and testingnot Thunder Client
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Kong
- API Gatewaynot Kong
- API Testingnot Kong
- API Documentationnot Kong
- Microservicesnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Thunder Client?
- Kong starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Kong or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceThunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?
Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.
SourceKong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceThunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?
Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.
SourceKong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong vs Bruno
- Kong vs Paw
- Kong vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong vs HTTPie
- Kong vs Prisma
- Kong vs RapidAPI
- Kong vs 10x Banking
- Kong vs Brite Payments
- Kong vs Bud Financial
- Kong vs Directus
- Kong vs Episode Six
- Kong vs Swagger
- Thunder Client vs Convoy
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Tyk
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs Gravitee
- Thunder Client vs Janus Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Thunder Client vs 3scale
- Thunder Client vs Akana
- Thunder Client vs Enable Banking
- Thunder Client vs Flybits
- Thunder Client vs i2c
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Liveblocks
- Thunder Client vs Moesif
- Thunder Client vs REST Client VSCode
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs Paw
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs HTTPie
- Thunder Client vs Prisma
- Thunder Client vs RapidAPI
- Thunder Client vs 10x Banking
- Thunder Client vs Brite Payments
- Thunder Client vs Bud Financial
- Thunder Client vs Directus
- Thunder Client vs Episode Six
- Thunder Client vs Swagger

