Softwr

Software · head to head

Bruno vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Bruno logo

Bruno

Software

Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Spring Cloud Gateway logo

Spring Cloud Gateway

Software

API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
  • They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bruno and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.

Attributes where Bruno and Spring Cloud Gateway differ
AttributeBrunoSpring Cloud Gateway
PlatformsWindows, MacOS, LinuxJava, Spring Boot
Founded20221998

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bruno

  • API Testing
  • Environment management
  • Git-friendly storage
  • GitHub
  • Git repositories
  • Local file system
  • Windows support
  • MacOS support

Only in Spring Cloud Gateway

  • Routing
  • Path Rewriting
  • Circuit Breaker
  • Spring Boot
  • Spring Security
  • Spring Cloud
  • Java support
  • Spring Boot support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bruno

  • Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Spring Cloud Gateway
  • Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Spring Cloud Gateway
  • Offline API development without an accountnot Spring Cloud Gateway
  • Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Spring Cloud Gateway

Spring Cloud Gateway

  • API Developmentnot Bruno
  • API Gatewaynot Bruno
  • API Testingnot Bruno
  • API Documentationnot Bruno
  • Microservicesnot Bruno

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bruno

  • Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
  • OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
  • SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
  • Private workspaces are a paid feature
  • Advertised prices are annual rates

Spring Cloud Gateway

  • Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier

Pricing, plan by plan

Bruno

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full IDE features
    • Git integration
    • Local storage

Spring Cloud Gateway

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Core Spring Cloud Gateway
    • Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose Bruno if

  • You need api testing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
  • You also want environment management.
Bruno review

Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if

  • You need routing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Java, Spring Boot.
  • You also want path rewriting.
Spring Cloud Gateway review

Questions people ask

Is Bruno or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bruno or Spring Cloud Gateway?
Bruno starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
Does Bruno or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
Can I use Bruno for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Bruno best used for?
Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
What can Bruno do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Bruno

More on Spring Cloud Gateway

Keep looking

Other head to heads