APIs · head to head
Bruno vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Bruno
APIs
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bruno | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | Windows, MacOS, Linux | Java, Spring Boot |
| Founded | 2022 | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- GitHub
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Offline API development without an accountnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot Bruno
- API Gatewaynot Bruno
- API Testingnot Bruno
- API Documentationnot Bruno
- Microservicesnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core API Client
- Limited Git integration
- 2 Workspaces
- Pro$6/month
- Core API Client
- Native Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
- Ultimate$11/month
- Core API Client
- Full Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- Bruno starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does Bruno or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bruno: What is included in Bruno's free tier?
The Open Source plan includes the core API client, limited Git integration, and up to 2 workspaces at no cost. A 14-day free trial of the Ultimate plan is also available without requiring a credit card.
SourceSpring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
SourceBruno: What is the difference between Bruno Pro and Ultimate plans?
Pro ($6/month) includes native Git integration and unlimited workspaces. Ultimate ($11/month) adds SSO/SCIM support, audit logs, 24-hour support (vs. 48-hour), and an account manager. Ultimate supports unlimited OpenAPI syncs while Pro is limited to 5 per month.
SourceSpring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
SourceBruno: How much does Bruno Pro save compared to other API tools?
The vendor claims Ultimate saves teams more than 70% versus Postman, though this comparison is promotional rather than a specific cost metric.
SourceRelated pages
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs REST Client VSCode
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs Apidog
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Hoppscotch
- Bruno vs HTTPie
- Bruno vs Kong
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs Tyk
- Bruno vs Directus
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Basis Theory
- Bruno vs Boomi API Management
- Bruno vs Codat
- Bruno vs Kong Gateway
- Bruno vs Janus Gateway
- Bruno vs Convoy
- Bruno vs WSO2 API Manager
- Bruno vs Gravitee
- Bruno vs KeystoneJS
- Bruno vs Strapi
- Bruno vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Bruno vs Thredd
- Bruno vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Apidog
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hoppscotch
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs HTTPie
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Directus
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Asyncapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Basis Theory
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Boomi API Management
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Codat
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
