Manufacturing · head to head
SolidWorks vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP

SolidWorks
Manufacturing
Parametric desktop 3D CAD from Dassault Systemes, now sold as named-user subscription on the 3DEXPERIENCE platform
- From
- $2820/year
- Rated
- -

Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Manufacturing
Distributed control system for continuous process plants with a documented 30-year upgrade path
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SolidWorks the desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.; Yokogawa CENTUM VP there is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- They diverge on capability: SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling, Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SolidWorks and Yokogawa CENTUM VP actually diverge.
| Attribute | SolidWorks | Yokogawa CENTUM VP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2820/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, On-premise |
| Founded | 1993 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SolidWorks
- 3D solid modeling
- Assembly design
- Technical drawings
- Simulation
- Rendering
- PDM systems
- ERP systems
- CAM software
Only in Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Field Control Station
- N-IO
- Human Interface Station
- ProSafe-RS integration
- Vnet/IP
- Migration from CS 1000 and CS 3000
- Exaquantum integration
- Alarm management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SolidWorks
- Product designnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Engineering analysisnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Manufacturing documentationnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Prototypingnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Quality controlnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Replacing end-of-life CENTUM CS 3000 controllers during a refinery turnaround without pulling field cablingnot SolidWorks
- Greenfield LNG train where the control and safety systems must share one operator console and one event lognot SolidWorks
- Specialty chemicals batch plant needing sequence control with recipe management and full electronic batch recordsnot SolidWorks
- Combined cycle power station where 99.99999 percent availability figures are written into the contractnot SolidWorks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SolidWorks
- The desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- Perpetual licences are no longer sold through the vendor online store and come only through resellers, and a perpetual licence still needs a paid annual service contract to get upgrades and support, so buying once and paying nothing again is not really on offer.
- Named-user subscription is per person rather than floating, so an organisation where several engineers each use CAD occasionally pays full seats for part-time use unless it negotiates otherwise.
- History-based parametric modelling breaks noisily: a change high in the feature tree can cascade rebuild errors through an assembly, which is a real productivity cost compared with direct modelling tools.
- Large assemblies stress single-threaded desktop performance, and teams routinely resort to configurations, simplified representations and expensive workstations rather than the software scaling on its own.
- The Maker licence watermarks its files so they can only be opened on other Maker licences, which means hobby work cannot be carried into a commercial seat later without exporting to neutral formats and losing the feature history.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- There is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- Engineering and commissioning routinely cost several times the hardware and software, and owners who budget from the equipment quote alone are consistently short.
- The ecosystem is closed: controllers, I/O and diagnostics are Yokogawa, and third-party alternatives at the controller layer do not exist, so the vendor holds pricing power for the twenty years or more the plant runs.
- Operator stations run on Windows and are tied to specific validated Windows releases, so operating system end-of-life forces console refresh cycles that are governed by Yokogawa validation rather than by your IT policy.
- Engineering staff who know CENTUM are scarce outside Japan, the Middle East and South East Asia, and in North America and Europe you will pay a premium or depend on Yokogawa’s own services organisation for changes.
Pricing, plan by plan
SolidWorks
$2820/year- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Standard$2820/year
- 235 USD per month billed annually, or 846 USD per quarter
- Per named user, excluding local tax
- Part and assembly modelling and 2D drawings
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Professional$3456/year
- 288 USD per month billed annually, or 1,038 USD per quarter
- Everything in Standard
- Intelligent CAD libraries of standard fasteners
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Premium$4716/year
- 393 USD per month billed annually, or 1,416 USD per quarter
- Everything in Professional
- Linear static analysis for parts and assemblies
- SOLIDWORKS xDesign$2580/year
- 810 USD per quarter
- Browser-based cloud modelling, no local install
- Runs on Mac, Chromebook and tablets as well as Windows
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
On request- CENTUM VP$undefined/year
- Priced as an engineered system, not a per-seat licence
- Cost driven by I/O count, controller redundancy and number of operator stations
- Engineering, FAT, commissioning and training quoted separately and usually exceed hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose SolidWorks if
- You need 3d solid modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want assembly design.
Choose Yokogawa CENTUM VP if
- You need field control station.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want n-io.
Questions people ask
- Is SolidWorks or Yokogawa CENTUM VP better?
- Neither clearly leads. SolidWorks starts at $2820/year and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SolidWorks or Yokogawa CENTUM VP?
- SolidWorks starts at $2820/year and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request.
- Does SolidWorks or Yokogawa CENTUM VP run on more platforms?
- SolidWorks runs on Windows. Yokogawa CENTUM VP runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is SolidWorks best used for?
- SolidWorks is most often used for product design, engineering analysis, manufacturing documentation, prototyping. Of those, product design and engineering analysis are not what Yokogawa CENTUM VP is typically brought in for.
- What can SolidWorks do that Yokogawa CENTUM VP cannot?
- SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling, Assembly design, Technical drawings, Simulation. Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station, N-IO, Human Interface Station, ProSafe-RS integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SolidWorks: Can you still buy a SOLIDWORKS perpetual licence?
Not from the vendor online store, which sells only term subscriptions. Perpetual licences remain available through resellers, but they still require a paid annual subscription service contract for upgrades and support.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Can I upgrade from CENTUM CS 3000 without rewiring the plant?
Yes. Yokogawa sells migration packages that replace the controller and keep existing field wiring and marshalling, which is the main reason CENTUM installations stay CENTUM.
SolidWorks: How much does SOLIDWORKS cost per year?
The 3DS store lists Standard at 2,820 USD, Professional at 3,456 USD and Premium at 4,716 USD per named user per year, excluding local tax. Quarterly terms are 846, 1,038 and 1,416 USD.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Is CENTUM VP sold as a subscription?
No. It is a capital purchase of hardware and licences with an annual service agreement for updates and support.
SolidWorks: What is the difference between desktop SOLIDWORKS and the 3DEXPERIENCE cloud tiers?
The desktop application still does the modelling and installs locally on Windows. The 3DEXPERIENCE platform adds cloud storage, versioning, mark-up and shared review around it. SOLIDWORKS xDesign is the separate browser-native modeller at 2,580 USD a year, and it runs on Mac and Chromebook.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: How does it compare with Emerson DeltaV on cost?
Neither publishes prices. CENTUM tends to win on brownfield migration cost because the field wiring stays; DeltaV tends to be cheaper on small greenfield systems.
SolidWorks: Is there a cheap version for hobbyists?
Yes. 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS for Makers is 48 USD a year or 15 USD a month, limited to personal use with project sales under 2,000 USD a year, and its files are watermarked for Maker licences only.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Do I need a separate safety system?
Yes, for SIL-rated functions. ProSafe-RS is the Yokogawa SIS and shares the CENTUM engineering database and operator console.
SolidWorks: Does SOLIDWORKS run on a Mac?
Not natively. Use the browser-based xDesign, or run the desktop application in a Windows virtual machine.
Related pages
More on Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Other head to heads
- SolidWorks vs Fusion 360
- SolidWorks vs Fulcrum
- SolidWorks vs Tulip
- SolidWorks vs MachineMetrics
- SolidWorks vs Fictiv
- SolidWorks vs Aras Innovator
- SolidWorks vs AVEVA System Platform
- SolidWorks vs Materialise Magics
- SolidWorks vs Seeq
- SolidWorks vs Propel
- SolidWorks vs PTC Windchill
- SolidWorks vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- SolidWorks vs Flow Software
- SolidWorks vs Formlabs PreForm
- SolidWorks vs GENESIS Version 11
- SolidWorks vs GrabCAD Print
- SolidWorks vs Guidewheel
- SolidWorks vs JobBOSS²
- SolidWorks vs Ignition
- SolidWorks vs ABB 800xA
- SolidWorks vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- SolidWorks vs COPA-DATA zenon
- SolidWorks vs QAD Redzone
- SolidWorks vs Sight Machine
- SolidWorks vs Authentise
- SolidWorks vs Oden Technologies
- SolidWorks vs Kepware Server
- SolidWorks vs Litmus Edge
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Fusion 360
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Fulcrum
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Tulip
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs MachineMetrics
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Fictiv
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Aras Innovator
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs AVEVA System Platform
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Materialise Magics
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Seeq
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Propel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs PTC Windchill
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Flow Software
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Formlabs PreForm
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GENESIS Version 11
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GrabCAD Print
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Guidewheel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs JobBOSS²
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Ignition
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ABB 800xA
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs QAD Redzone
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Sight Machine
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Authentise
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oden Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Kepware Server
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Litmus Edge
