Manufacturing · head to head
COPA-DATA zenon vs SolidWorks

COPA-DATA zenon
Manufacturing
HMI, SCADA and energy automation platform licensed by I/O tag count
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

SolidWorks
Manufacturing
Parametric desktop 3D CAD from Dassault Systemes, now sold as named-user subscription on the 3DEXPERIENCE platform
- From
- $2820/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: COPA-DATA zenon the I/O count that determines your licence band is a weighted calculation, not a variable tally, so projects sized from a tag list routinely land in a higher and more expensive band than budgeted.; SolidWorks the desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- They diverge on capability: COPA-DATA zenon covers I/O-banded licensing, SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which COPA-DATA zenon and SolidWorks actually diverge.
| Attribute | COPA-DATA zenon | SolidWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $2820/year |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per year |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 1993 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in COPA-DATA zenon
- I/O-banded licensing
- IEC 61850 native
- zenon Logic
- Pharmaceutical compliance
- Multi-project engineering
- Redundancy
Only in SolidWorks
- 3D solid modeling
- Assembly design
- Technical drawings
- Simulation
- Rendering
- PDM systems
- ERP systems
- CAM software
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
COPA-DATA zenon
- A pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the SCADA layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic HMInot SolidWorks
- A utility automating substations that wants IEC 61850 SCL import and DNP3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver optionsnot SolidWorks
- A machine builder shipping identical HMI applications to many customers who wants one engineering project reused across machine and line levelnot SolidWorks
- A food and beverage site in German-speaking Europe where local integrator availability for zenon is strong and Rockwell coverage is notnot SolidWorks
SolidWorks
- Product designnot COPA-DATA zenon
- Engineering analysisnot COPA-DATA zenon
- Manufacturing documentationnot COPA-DATA zenon
- Prototypingnot COPA-DATA zenon
- Quality controlnot COPA-DATA zenon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
COPA-DATA zenon
- The I/O count that determines your licence band is a weighted calculation, not a variable tally, so projects sized from a tag list routinely land in a higher and more expensive band than budgeted.
- The integrator and engineering talent pool is concentrated in German-speaking Europe; a North American or Asian site can find itself dependent on a single partner with no competitive quote available.
- English-language documentation and community material lag the German equivalents, which slows engineers who are learning the product without formal COPA-DATA training.
- The annual software maintenance contract is a percentage of licence value, so a large I/O estate carries a recurring cost that does not fall even when the plant is stable and nothing is changing.
- Third-party ecosystem extensions are far fewer than for Ignition or FactoryTalk, so requirements outside the box tend to become custom engineering billed at partner day rates.
SolidWorks
- The desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- Perpetual licences are no longer sold through the vendor online store and come only through resellers, and a perpetual licence still needs a paid annual service contract to get upgrades and support, so buying once and paying nothing again is not really on offer.
- Named-user subscription is per person rather than floating, so an organisation where several engineers each use CAD occasionally pays full seats for part-time use unless it negotiates otherwise.
- History-based parametric modelling breaks noisily: a change high in the feature tree can cascade rebuild errors through an assembly, which is a real productivity cost compared with direct modelling tools.
- Large assemblies stress single-threaded desktop performance, and teams routinely resort to configurations, simplified representations and expensive workstations rather than the software scaling on its own.
- The Maker licence watermarks its files so they can only be opened on other Maker licences, which means hobby work cannot be carried into a commercial seat later without exporting to neutral formats and losing the feature history.
Pricing, plan by plan
COPA-DATA zenon
On request- zenon$undefined/year
- Runtime licensed in bands by calculated I/O count
- Numeric variables weighted upward in the I/O calculation, binary counted singly
- Engineering Studio licensed separately from runtime
SolidWorks
$2820/year- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Standard$2820/year
- 235 USD per month billed annually, or 846 USD per quarter
- Per named user, excluding local tax
- Part and assembly modelling and 2D drawings
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Professional$3456/year
- 288 USD per month billed annually, or 1,038 USD per quarter
- Everything in Standard
- Intelligent CAD libraries of standard fasteners
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Premium$4716/year
- 393 USD per month billed annually, or 1,416 USD per quarter
- Everything in Professional
- Linear static analysis for parts and assemblies
- SOLIDWORKS xDesign$2580/year
- 810 USD per quarter
- Browser-based cloud modelling, no local install
- Runs on Mac, Chromebook and tablets as well as Windows
Which should you pick?
Choose COPA-DATA zenon if
- You need i/o-banded licensing.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want iec 61850 native.
Choose SolidWorks if
- You need 3d solid modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want assembly design.
Questions people ask
- Is COPA-DATA zenon or SolidWorks better?
- Neither clearly leads. COPA-DATA zenon starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, COPA-DATA zenon or SolidWorks?
- COPA-DATA zenon starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year.
- Does COPA-DATA zenon or SolidWorks run on more platforms?
- COPA-DATA zenon runs on Windows, Linux, Web. SolidWorks runs on Windows.
- What is COPA-DATA zenon best used for?
- COPA-DATA zenon is most often used for a pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the scada layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic hmi, a utility automating substations that wants iec 61850 scl import and dnp3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver options, a machine builder shipping identical hmi applications to many customers who wants one engineering project reused across machine and line level, a food and beverage site in german-speaking europe where local integrator availability for zenon is strong and rockwell coverage is not. Of those, a pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the scada layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic hmi and a utility automating substations that wants iec 61850 scl import and dnp3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver options are not what SolidWorks is typically brought in for.
- What can COPA-DATA zenon do that SolidWorks cannot?
- COPA-DATA zenon covers I/O-banded licensing, IEC 61850 native, zenon Logic, Pharmaceutical compliance. SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling, Assembly design, Technical drawings, Simulation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
COPA-DATA zenon: How is a zenon licence sized?
By calculated I/O count. Numeric variables are weighted upward in that calculation and binary values counted singly, so ask your partner for the calculated figure, not the variable count, before signing.
SolidWorks: Can you still buy a SOLIDWORKS perpetual licence?
Not from the vendor online store, which sells only term subscriptions. Perpetual licences remain available through resellers, but they still require a paid annual subscription service contract for upgrades and support.
COPA-DATA zenon: Is zenon only for factories?
No. A significant part of its installed base is electrical substation automation, where IEC 61850 support is native rather than an add-on.
SolidWorks: How much does SOLIDWORKS cost per year?
The 3DS store lists Standard at 2,820 USD, Professional at 3,456 USD and Premium at 4,716 USD per named user per year, excluding local tax. Quarterly terms are 846, 1,038 and 1,416 USD.
COPA-DATA zenon: Is there a free version?
There is a demo mode for evaluation and a free educational licence, but production runtime always needs a paid, I/O-banded licence.
SolidWorks: What is the difference between desktop SOLIDWORKS and the 3DEXPERIENCE cloud tiers?
The desktop application still does the modelling and installs locally on Windows. The 3DEXPERIENCE platform adds cloud storage, versioning, mark-up and shared review around it. SOLIDWORKS xDesign is the separate browser-native modeller at 2,580 USD a year, and it runs on Mac and Chromebook.
COPA-DATA zenon: Can zenon replace a PLC?
zenon Logic is an IEC 61131-3 soft PLC and can control non-safety-critical processes, but most deployments keep a hardware PLC and use zenon for visualisation and supervision.
SolidWorks: Is there a cheap version for hobbyists?
Yes. 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS for Makers is 48 USD a year or 15 USD a month, limited to personal use with project sales under 2,000 USD a year, and its files are watermarked for Maker licences only.
SolidWorks: Does SOLIDWORKS run on a Mac?
Not natively. Use the browser-based xDesign, or run the desktop application in a Windows virtual machine.
Related pages
More on COPA-DATA zenon
Other head to heads
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Ignition
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- COPA-DATA zenon vs AVEVA System Platform
- COPA-DATA zenon vs GENESIS Version 11
- COPA-DATA zenon vs ABB 800xA
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Flow Software
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Materialise Magics
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Propel
- COPA-DATA zenon vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- COPA-DATA zenon vs SKF Enlight Centre
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Hippo CMMS
- COPA-DATA zenon vs 3YOURMIND
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Fusion 360
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Fulcrum
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Tulip
- COPA-DATA zenon vs MachineMetrics
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Fictiv
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Aras Innovator
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Seeq
- COPA-DATA zenon vs PTC Windchill
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Formlabs PreForm
- COPA-DATA zenon vs GrabCAD Print
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Guidewheel
- COPA-DATA zenon vs JobBOSS²
- SolidWorks vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- SolidWorks vs Ignition
- SolidWorks vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- SolidWorks vs AVEVA System Platform
- SolidWorks vs GENESIS Version 11
- SolidWorks vs ABB 800xA
- SolidWorks vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- SolidWorks vs Flow Software
- SolidWorks vs Materialise Magics
- SolidWorks vs Propel
- SolidWorks vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- SolidWorks vs SKF Enlight Centre
- SolidWorks vs Hippo CMMS
- SolidWorks vs 3YOURMIND
- SolidWorks vs Fusion 360
- SolidWorks vs Fulcrum
- SolidWorks vs Tulip
- SolidWorks vs MachineMetrics
- SolidWorks vs Fictiv
- SolidWorks vs Aras Innovator
- SolidWorks vs Seeq
- SolidWorks vs PTC Windchill
- SolidWorks vs Formlabs PreForm
- SolidWorks vs GrabCAD Print
- SolidWorks vs Guidewheel
- SolidWorks vs JobBOSS²
