Construction · head to head
Reconstruct vs RIB CostX

Reconstruct
Construction
Reality capture and progress tracking that aligns site imagery to the model and the schedule
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RIB CostX
Construction
2D and BIM quantity takeoff with live-linked estimating workbooks for quantity surveyors and estimators
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Reconstruct pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.; RIB CostX pricing is not published anywhere and is quoted per package and per seat through regional resellers, so two firms of similar size routinely pay materially different rates for the same configuration.
- They diverge on capability: Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture, RIB CostX covers 2D drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Reconstruct and RIB CostX actually diverge.
| Attribute | Reconstruct | RIB CostX |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Reconstruct
- Device-agnostic capture
- Photogrammetry and mesh generation
- 4D schedule alignment
- Design overlay
- Time slider
- Measurement tools
- Issue tracking
- Remote walkthrough
Only in RIB CostX
- 2D drawing takeoff
- BIM and 3D takeoff
- Live-linked workbooks
- Drawing revision comparison
- Bill of quantities production
- Rate libraries
- Subcontractor comparison
- CostX Viewer
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Reconstruct
- A general contractor whose monthly progress claim is regularly challenged by the owner, needing dated visual evidence tied to schedule activities rather than a folder of photosnot RIB CostX
- An owner running projects in several countries who wants to cut executive site visits without accepting the contractor’s self-reported percentage completenot RIB CostX
- A healthcare or data centre fit-out where above-ceiling services must be recorded before they are closed up, so later maintenance does not require demolitionnot RIB CostX
- A delay or defect dispute where the decisive question is what was physically in place on a specific date and the only other evidence is contested emailnot RIB CostX
RIB CostX
- A quantity surveying practice that must issue a formatted bill of quantities under NRM or SMM7 and cannot do so from a generic takeoff toolnot Reconstruct
- A contractor tendering a job where the client reissues drawings mid-tender, needing revision comparison so only changed areas are remeasurednot Reconstruct
- An estimating department moving from paper and Excel to model-based measurement while keeping the same rate library and bill structurenot Reconstruct
- A cost consultant producing early-stage elemental cost plans from partial models, then refining the same workbook as design detail arrivesnot Reconstruct
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Reconstruct
- Pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- The whole value depends on disciplined recurring capture, and site teams treat walking the building with a camera as a low-priority chore, so datasets go stale exactly when a dispute makes them valuable.
- Photogrammetry from handheld footage is less accurate than laser scanning, so it is fine for progress and coordination but should not be relied on for tight as-built tolerances or prefabrication dimensions.
- Schedule alignment requires a well-structured schedule with activities that map to physical locations; on projects where the programme is a coarse rolled-up bar chart the progress calculation is close to meaningless.
- It is another platform alongside Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud rather than a replacement, so buyers add a subscription and a workflow rather than consolidating one, and the business case has to survive that.
RIB CostX
- Pricing is not published anywhere and is quoted per package and per seat through regional resellers, so two firms of similar size routinely pay materially different rates for the same configuration.
- It is Windows desktop software with heavy graphics demands; there is no meaningful macOS or browser option, which rules it out for practices standardised on Apple hardware.
- The learning curve is steep enough that firms typically budget formal training, and an estimator productive in a rival tool takes weeks rather than days to reach the same output here.
- RIB is owned by Schneider Electric, whose strategic interest is the wider RIB construction cloud, so a buyer choosing CostX today is betting on continued investment in a desktop estimating product inside a group focused elsewhere.
- BIM takeoff is only as good as the model, and on projects where the model is modelled for coordination rather than measurement the automatic quantities need enough manual checking that the time saving largely disappears.
Pricing, plan by plan
Reconstruct
On request- Reconstruct$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per portfolio
- Unlimited capture devices
- 4D schedule alignment
RIB CostX
On request- CostX Quantify$undefined/year
- 2D and BIM takeoff
- Measurement export
- No integrated estimating workbook
- CostX Core$undefined/year
- Takeoff plus live-linked workbooks
- Rate libraries
- Standard reporting
- CostX Complete$undefined/year
- Full BIM takeoff
- Advanced workbooks and bills of quantities
- Subcontractor comparison
Which should you pick?
Choose Reconstruct if
- You need device-agnostic capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want photogrammetry and mesh generation.
Choose RIB CostX if
- You need 2d drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want bim and 3d takeoff.
Questions people ask
- Is Reconstruct or RIB CostX better?
- Neither clearly leads. Reconstruct starts at On request and RIB CostX at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Reconstruct or RIB CostX?
- Reconstruct starts at On request and RIB CostX at On request.
- Does Reconstruct or RIB CostX run on more platforms?
- Reconstruct runs on Web, iOS, Android. RIB CostX runs on Windows.
- What is Reconstruct best used for?
- Reconstruct is most often used for a general contractor whose monthly progress claim is regularly challenged by the owner, needing dated visual evidence tied to schedule activities rather than a folder of photos, an owner running projects in several countries who wants to cut executive site visits without accepting the contractor’s self-reported percentage complete, a healthcare or data centre fit-out where above-ceiling services must be recorded before they are closed up, so later maintenance does not require demolition, a delay or defect dispute where the decisive question is what was physically in place on a specific date and the only other evidence is contested email. Of those, a general contractor whose monthly progress claim is regularly challenged by the owner, needing dated visual evidence tied to schedule activities rather than a folder of photos and an owner running projects in several countries who wants to cut executive site visits without accepting the contractor’s self-reported percentage complete are not what RIB CostX is typically brought in for.
- What can Reconstruct do that RIB CostX cannot?
- Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture, Photogrammetry and mesh generation, 4D schedule alignment, Design overlay. RIB CostX covers 2D drawing takeoff, BIM and 3D takeoff, Live-linked workbooks, Drawing revision comparison.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Reconstruct: How much does Reconstruct cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or portfolio. Ask specifically whether the price scales by project count, square footage or capture volume, because those give very different totals.
RIB CostX: How much does RIB CostX cost?
RIB does not publish prices. It is quoted per package (Quantify, Core or Complete) and per seat, usually through a regional reseller.
Reconstruct: Do we need a drone or a laser scanner?
No. It works from 360 cameras and even smartphone video. Drones and scanners improve exterior and accuracy-critical coverage.
RIB CostX: Is a perpetual licence available?
RIB has historically offered both perpetual and subscription licensing, with subscription now the default push. Ask explicitly, because the perpetual option is not advertised.
Reconstruct: How accurate is it?
Accurate enough for progress, coordination and dispute evidence. It is not a substitute for survey-grade laser scanning where tolerances matter.
RIB CostX: Does it do BIM takeoff or just 2D?
Both. Complete handles IFC and Revit models; Quantify and Core differ in workbook capability rather than measurement.
Reconstruct: Who owns the captured data at closeout?
The customer. Confirm the export format and retention terms in the contract before handover, because a reality archive is only useful if you can still open it in five years.
RIB CostX: Who is it for?
Quantity surveyors and estimators in markets that use bills of quantities: UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East and South Africa above all.
Reconstruct: Does it replace Procore?
No. It integrates with Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud and adds the visual as-built layer.
RIB CostX: Can we open estimates without a licence?
A free CostX Viewer lets others open and inspect measured drawings and workbooks without a full seat.
Related pages
More on Reconstruct
Other head to heads
- Reconstruct vs Dalux
- Reconstruct vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Reconstruct vs Procore
- Reconstruct vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Reconstruct vs Buildots
- Reconstruct vs Propeller Aero
- Reconstruct vs Openspace
- Reconstruct vs HCSS
- Reconstruct vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Reconstruct vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Reconstruct vs Togal.AI
- Reconstruct vs Trunk Tools
- Reconstruct vs Briq
- Reconstruct vs Buildertrend
- Reconstruct vs ConstructConnect
- Reconstruct vs Cubit Estimating
- Reconstruct vs BuildingConnected
- Reconstruct vs PlanSwift
- Reconstruct vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Reconstruct vs Bluebeam Revu
- Reconstruct vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Reconstruct vs Autodesk Revit
- Reconstruct vs B2W Estimate
- Reconstruct vs Assignar
- Reconstruct vs Billd
- Reconstruct vs Bridgit Bravo
- Reconstruct vs Builderbox
- RIB CostX vs Dalux
- RIB CostX vs Skydio Dock for X10
- RIB CostX vs Procore
- RIB CostX vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- RIB CostX vs Buildots
- RIB CostX vs Propeller Aero
- RIB CostX vs Openspace
- RIB CostX vs HCSS
- RIB CostX vs HCSS HeavyBid
- RIB CostX vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- RIB CostX vs Togal.AI
- RIB CostX vs Trunk Tools
- RIB CostX vs Briq
- RIB CostX vs Buildertrend
- RIB CostX vs ConstructConnect
- RIB CostX vs Cubit Estimating
- RIB CostX vs BuildingConnected
- RIB CostX vs PlanSwift
- RIB CostX vs STACK Construction Technologies
- RIB CostX vs Bluebeam Revu
- RIB CostX vs On-Screen Takeoff
- RIB CostX vs Autodesk Revit
- RIB CostX vs B2W Estimate
- RIB CostX vs Assignar
- RIB CostX vs Billd
- RIB CostX vs Bridgit Bravo
- RIB CostX vs Builderbox
