APIs · head to head
REST Client VSCode vs Swan

REST Client VSCode
APIs
VSCode extension for making HTTP requests and testing REST APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Swan
APIs
European banking-as-a-service platform for embedding accounts, cards and payments into other products
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only REST Client VSCode has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: REST Client VSCode limited to Visual Studio Code; not available as a standalone application; Swan its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- They diverge on capability: REST Client VSCode covers REST Client, Swan covers Embedded business accounts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which REST Client VSCode and Swan actually diverge.
| Attribute | REST Client VSCode | Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, API |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in REST Client VSCode
- REST Client
- HTTP requests
- Response viewing
- VSCode
- Environment variables
- Custom headers
- VSCode extension support
Only in Swan
- Embedded business accounts
- Card issuing
- SEPA payments
- Local account localisation
- ACPR regulation
- Usage-based pricing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
REST Client VSCode
- API Developmentnot Swan
- API Gatewaynot Swan
- API Testingnot Swan
- API Documentationnot Swan
- Microservicesnot Swan
Swan
- A vertical SaaS platform wanting to embed business bank accounts under its own brandnot REST Client VSCode
- A marketplace wanting to issue cards to sellers or partners without becoming a licensed banknot REST Client VSCode
- A company wanting SEPA payment initiation embedded directly into its own productnot REST Client VSCode
- A European fintech wanting to avoid a six-figure setup fee and long lock-in typical of legacy banking-as-a-service dealsnot REST Client VSCode
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
REST Client VSCode
- Limited to Visual Studio Code; not available as a standalone application
- No support for WebSocket, gRPC, or other advanced protocols
- No cloud sync or team server features; requires Git-based workflow
Swan
- Its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- Pricing is described only philosophically (usage-based, no big setup fee) rather than published as an actual rate card, so a company still needs a sales conversation to get real numbers.
- Embedding banking features into a product is a substantial compliance and design undertaking regardless of the vendor, and Swan handling the licence does not remove a platform's own KYC, AML and customer support obligations for the accounts it offers.
- As a comparatively young, single-country-licensed e-money institution, its balance sheet and regulatory standing carry more concentration risk than a banking-as-a-service offering backed by an established, multi-jurisdiction bank.
- Local account depth is explicitly limited to France, Germany and Spain, so a platform needing native local accounts in other European countries may find coverage thinner than expected.
Pricing, plan by plan
REST Client VSCode
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the REST Client VSCode review.
Swan
On request- Swan$undefined/month
- Usage-based pricing, no published rate card
- No long-term contract or large setup fee required
- Custom quote based on current, not forecast, usage
Which should you pick?
Choose REST Client VSCode if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want http requests.
Choose Swan if
- You need embedded business accounts.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want card issuing.
Questions people ask
- Is REST Client VSCode or Swan better?
- Neither clearly leads. REST Client VSCode starts at Free and Swan at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, REST Client VSCode or Swan?
- REST Client VSCode has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for REST Client VSCode and On request for Swan.
- Does REST Client VSCode or Swan run on more platforms?
- REST Client VSCode runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Swan runs on Web, API.
- Can I use REST Client VSCode for free?
- Yes. REST Client VSCode has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Swan starts at On request.
- What is REST Client VSCode best used for?
- REST Client VSCode is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Swan is typically brought in for.
- What can REST Client VSCode do that Swan cannot?
- REST Client VSCode covers REST Client, HTTP requests, Response viewing, VSCode. Swan covers Embedded business accounts, Card issuing, SEPA payments, Local account localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
REST Client VSCode: How much does REST Client VSCode cost?
REST Client VSCode is completely free and open source. It is available on the Visual Studio Code Marketplace with no subscription or licensing fees.
SourceSwan: Which countries does Swan offer local accounts in?
France, Germany and Spain specifically, alongside broader SEPA payment coverage.
REST Client VSCode: What authentication methods does REST Client support?
REST Client supports Basic Auth, Digest Auth, SSL certificates, Azure AD, and AWS Signature v4 authentication for API requests.
SourceSwan: Is pricing published?
No, Swan describes a usage-based, no-large-setup-fee philosophy but requires a quote for actual numbers.
REST Client VSCode: Can I save and manage multiple requests?
Yes. REST Client supports multiple requests per file using ### delimiters, request history with auto-save, environment variables for different configurations, and code snippet generation for multiple programming languages.
SourceSwan: Who regulates Swan?
France's ACPR (Autorite de Controle Prudentiel et de Resolution), as a licensed e-money institution.
REST Client VSCode: How do teams collaborate with REST Client?
REST Client requests are stored as text files that can be version-controlled in Git repositories. Teams collaborate by sharing requests through Git, making the API specs part of the codebase.
SourceREST Client VSCode: What protocols does REST Client support?
REST Client primarily supports HTTP/HTTPS and GraphQL. It does not support WebSocket, gRPC, or other advanced protocols available in desktop clients like Insomnia.
SourceREST Client VSCode: Is there cloud sync for REST Client requests?
No. REST Client has no built-in cloud sync or team server features. All collaboration and sharing relies on Git repository management.
SourceRelated pages
More on REST Client VSCode
Other head to heads
- REST Client VSCode vs Thunder Client
- REST Client VSCode vs Bruno
- REST Client VSCode vs HTTPie
- REST Client VSCode vs PocketBase
- REST Client VSCode vs Paw
- REST Client VSCode vs curl
- REST Client VSCode vs Hoppscotch
- REST Client VSCode vs Appwrite
- REST Client VSCode vs Directus
- REST Client VSCode vs KeystoneJS
- REST Client VSCode vs Parse Server
- REST Client VSCode vs Strapi
- REST Client VSCode vs Trustly
- REST Client VSCode vs Tuum
- REST Client VSCode vs Unit
- REST Client VSCode vs Vodeno
- REST Client VSCode vs Weavr
- REST Client VSCode vs Apollo GraphQL
- REST Client VSCode vs Yapily
- REST Client VSCode vs Griffin
- REST Client VSCode vs Fintech Farm
- REST Client VSCode vs Lithic
- REST Client VSCode vs Solaris
- REST Client VSCode vs Treasury Prime
- REST Client VSCode vs Synctera
- REST Client VSCode vs Astra
- REST Client VSCode vs Treblle
- REST Client VSCode vs Tribe Payments
- Swan vs Thunder Client
- Swan vs Bruno
- Swan vs HTTPie
- Swan vs PocketBase
- Swan vs Paw
- Swan vs curl
- Swan vs Hoppscotch
- Swan vs Appwrite
- Swan vs Directus
- Swan vs KeystoneJS
- Swan vs Parse Server
- Swan vs Strapi
- Swan vs Trustly
- Swan vs Tuum
- Swan vs Unit
- Swan vs Vodeno
- Swan vs Weavr
- Swan vs Apollo GraphQL
- Swan vs Yapily
- Swan vs Griffin
- Swan vs Fintech Farm
- Swan vs Lithic
- Swan vs Solaris
- Swan vs Treasury Prime
- Swan vs Synctera
- Swan vs Astra
- Swan vs Treblle
- Swan vs Tribe Payments
