Developer Tools · head to head
Refact vs Blacksmith

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Refact requires configuration for optimal performance; Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- They diverge on capability: Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Refact and Blacksmith actually diverge.
| Attribute | Refact | Blacksmith |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium with paid tiers | Unknown |
| Platforms | VS Code, Web | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS |
| Founded | 2023 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Blacksmith
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Blacksmith
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Blacksmith
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Blacksmith
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Refact
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Refact
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Refact
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Refact
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Pricing, plan by plan
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Which should you pick?
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Refact or Blacksmith better?
- Neither clearly leads. Refact starts at Free and Blacksmith at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Refact or Blacksmith?
- Refact starts at Free and Blacksmith at Free.
- Does Refact or Blacksmith run on more platforms?
- Refact runs on VS Code, Web. Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Refact for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Refact best used for?
- Refact is most often used for autonomous code generation for development tasks, end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring, multi-language software development acceleration, enterprise development with data privacy requirements. Of those, autonomous code generation for development tasks and end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring are not what Blacksmith is typically brought in for.
- What can Refact do that Blacksmith cannot?
- Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration. Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Refact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceBlacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs ESLint
- Refact vs pnpm
- Refact vs Turborepo
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Penpot
- Refact vs Keycloak
- Refact vs Rust
- Refact vs CLion
- Refact vs GNAT Pro
- Refact vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Keil MDK
- Refact vs Vite
- Refact vs Bazel
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs Eclipse IDE
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Penpot
- Blacksmith vs Keycloak
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs CLion
- Blacksmith vs GNAT Pro
- Blacksmith vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Blacksmith vs GNU Emacs
- Blacksmith vs Keil MDK
- Blacksmith vs Vite
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs CodeSandbox
- Blacksmith vs Eclipse IDE
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
