Developer Tools · head to head
ESLint vs Refact

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ESLint slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ESLint and Refact actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ESLint
Nothing recorded that Refact does not also cover.
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ESLint
- Statically analysing JavaScript and JSX to find problems before runtimenot Refact
- Automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewritesnot Refact
- Enforcing a consistent code style across a teamnot Refact
- Running as a CI step to block non-conforming codenot Refact
- Writing custom rules for project-specific conventionsnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot ESLint
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot ESLint
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot ESLint
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot ESLint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ESLint
- Slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Complexity in configuration from scratch, particularly for TypeScript support
- Limited built-in TypeScript support, requiring separate parsers and coordination with new TypeScript features
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
ESLint
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ESLint review.
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose ESLint if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is ESLint or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. ESLint starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ESLint or Refact?
- ESLint starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does ESLint or Refact run on more platforms?
- ESLint runs on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use ESLint for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ESLint best used for?
- ESLint is most often used for statically analysing javascript and jsx to find problems before runtime, automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewrites, enforcing a consistent code style across a team, running as a ci step to block non-conforming code. Of those, statically analysing javascript and jsx to find problems before runtime and automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewrites are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can ESLint do that Refact cannot?
- Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ESLint: Does ESLint automatically fix code issues?
Many problems ESLint finds can be automatically fixed via the --fix flag. ESLint fixes are syntax-aware so you won't experience errors introduced by traditional find-and-replace algorithms.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceESLint: How much does ESLint cost?
ESLint is completely free and open-source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. The project accepts voluntary donations from sponsors.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceESLint: Can I write custom ESLint rules?
Yes. You can develop custom rules that work alongside built-in functionality through ESLint's plugin system, allowing complete customization for your project needs.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ESLint vs Visual Studio Code
- ESLint vs pnpm
- ESLint vs Turborepo
- ESLint vs GitHub Copilot
- ESLint vs Penpot
- ESLint vs Keycloak
- ESLint vs Rust
- ESLint vs CLion
- ESLint vs GNAT Pro
- ESLint vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- ESLint vs GNU Emacs
- ESLint vs Keil MDK
- ESLint vs Vite
- ESLint vs Bazel
- ESLint vs CodeSandbox
- ESLint vs Eclipse IDE
- ESLint vs Moonrepo
- ESLint vs Nx Cloud
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs pnpm
- Refact vs Turborepo
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Penpot
- Refact vs Keycloak
- Refact vs Rust
- Refact vs CLion
- Refact vs GNAT Pro
- Refact vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Keil MDK
- Refact vs Vite
- Refact vs Bazel
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs Eclipse IDE
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Nx Cloud

