Logging · head to head
Raygun vs Timber
The short version
- Only Timber has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Raygun crash Reporting error data is retained for 180 days and Real User Monitoring sessions for only 60 days; longer retention is Enterprise only; Timber vector requires manual deployment and configuration for production use
- They diverge on capability: Raygun covers Crash reporting, Timber covers Structured logging.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Raygun and Timber actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (usage-based), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Raygun
- Crash reporting
- Real user monitoring
- Performance tracking
- Source maps
Only in Timber
- Structured logging
- Context integration
- Real-time tail
- Archive storage
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Raygun
- Crash and error reporting for web, mobile and backend applicationsnot Timber
- Real user monitoring of front end page load and session performancenot Timber
- Application performance monitoring with request level tracesnot Timber
Timber
- Building observability pipelines for log aggregationnot Raygun
- Real-time data processing and transformationnot Raygun
- Integrating multiple data sources into centralized systemsnot Raygun
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Raygun
- Crash Reporting error data is retained for 180 days and Real User Monitoring sessions for only 60 days; longer retention is Enterprise only
- Crash Reporting, Real User Monitoring and APM are billed as three separate products, each metered on its own unit of errors, sessions or traces
- A Real User Monitoring session ends after 30 minutes of inactivity, so a single visit spanning breaks is billed as several sessions
- Usage beyond the plan allowance is billed on demand at $0.001 per error and $0.002 per session or trace
- Enterprise plan pricing is custom with no published rate
Timber
- Vector requires manual deployment and configuration for production use
- No hosted SaaS version available
- Limited GUI tools for pipeline management
Pricing, plan by plan
Raygun
$40/month- Basic$40/month
- Core monitoring, unlimited apps and members
- Basic alerts, deployment tracking
- Annual billing saves 33%
- Team$80/month
- Inbound filters and third-party integrations
- Unlimited dashboards and user roles
- Marked as MOST POPULAR plan
- Business$400/month
- SAML SSO and dedicated account manager
- Priority support and quarterly reviews
- Annual billing saves 33%
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing and compliance requirements
- Unlimited reports and SLA agreements
- Private Slack support
Timber
Free- FreeFree
- Structured logging
- Context integration
- Real-time tail
Which should you pick?
Choose Raygun if
- You need crash reporting.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real user monitoring.
Choose Timber if
- You need structured logging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want context integration.
Questions people ask
- Is Raygun or Timber better?
- Neither clearly leads. Raygun starts at $40/month and Timber at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Raygun or Timber?
- Timber has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $40/month for Raygun and Free for Timber.
- Does Raygun or Timber run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Timber for free?
- Yes. Timber has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Raygun starts at $40/month.
- What is Raygun best used for?
- Raygun is most often used for crash and error reporting for web, mobile and backend applications, real user monitoring of front end page load and session performance, application performance monitoring with request level traces. Of those, crash and error reporting for web, mobile and backend applications and real user monitoring of front end page load and session performance are not what Timber is typically brought in for.
- What can Raygun do that Timber cannot?
- Raygun covers Crash reporting, Real user monitoring, Performance tracking, Source maps. Timber covers Structured logging, Context integration, Real-time tail, Archive storage. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Raygun: Does Raygun offer a free trial?
Yes. Raygun offers a free 14-day trial with no credit card required. The trial includes feature access across all products.
SourceTimber: Is Timber/Vector free to use?
Yes, Vector is open-source software with no licensing costs. You deploy it yourself with no dependencies or runtime fees, though infrastructure hosting costs apply depending on your deployment.
SourceRaygun: What is Raygun's pricing model?
Raygun uses a usage-based pricing model with tiered plans starting at $40/month for Basic tier, plus per-event charges ($0.001 to $0.002 per event). Annual billing saves 33% compared to monthly rates.
SourceTimber: Does Vector offer enterprise support?
The website focuses on self-hosted deployment without mentioning commercial support tiers, suggesting enterprise support may require community resources or custom arrangements.
SourceRaygun: What features are included in the Team plan?
Team plan at $80/month includes inbound filters, third-party integrations, unlimited dashboards, user roles, and is marked as the most popular option. It's positioned between Basic and Business tiers.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Raygun vs Datadog Logs
- Raygun vs Elastic Stack
- Raygun vs New Relic
- Raygun vs Coralogix
- Raygun vs AppDynamics
- Raygun vs Airbrake
- Raygun vs Axiom
- Raygun vs Papertrail
- Raygun vs Rollbar
- Raygun vs Cronitor
- Raygun vs Openstatus
- Raygun vs Dynatrace
- Raygun vs Checkly
- Raygun vs CloudWatch
- Raygun vs incident.io
- Raygun vs FireHydrant
- Raygun vs Mezmo
- Raygun vs Sematext
- Raygun vs Rootly
- Raygun vs Fluent Bit
- Raygun vs Graylog
- Raygun vs Honeybadger
- Raygun vs Humio
- Raygun vs Filebeat
- Raygun vs Fluentd
- Timber vs Datadog Logs
- Timber vs Elastic Stack
- Timber vs New Relic
- Timber vs Coralogix
- Timber vs AppDynamics
- Timber vs Airbrake
- Timber vs Axiom
- Timber vs Papertrail
- Timber vs Rollbar
- Timber vs Cronitor
- Timber vs Openstatus
- Timber vs Dynatrace
- Timber vs Checkly
- Timber vs CloudWatch
- Timber vs incident.io
- Timber vs FireHydrant
- Timber vs Mezmo
- Timber vs Sematext
- Timber vs Rootly
- Timber vs Fluent Bit
- Timber vs Graylog
- Timber vs Honeybadger
- Timber vs Humio
- Timber vs Filebeat
- Timber vs Fluentd


