Software · head to head
Coralogix vs Raygun
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Coralogix no self-hosted option; cloud-only SaaS requiring use of customer's AWS, Azure, or GCP infrastructure; Raygun crash Reporting error data is retained for 180 days and Real User Monitoring sessions for only 60 days; longer retention is Enterprise only
- They diverge on capability: Coralogix covers Log aggregation, Raygun covers Crash reporting.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Coralogix and Raygun actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Coralogix
- Log aggregation
- Machine learning analytics
- Alerts
- Distributed tracing
Only in Raygun
- Crash reporting
- Real user monitoring
- Performance tracking
- Source maps
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Coralogix
- Enterprises requiring infinite log retention across logs, metrics, and tracesnot Raygun
- Organizations with cross-signal correlation needs (logs, metrics, traces unified)not Raygun
Raygun
- Crash and error reporting for web, mobile and backend applicationsnot Coralogix
- Real user monitoring of front end page load and session performancenot Coralogix
- Application performance monitoring with request level tracesnot Coralogix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Coralogix
- No self-hosted option; cloud-only SaaS requiring use of customer's AWS, Azure, or GCP infrastructure
- Pricing is purely usage-based per GB with no flat-rate subscription option; suitable for unpredictable workloads but no cost ceiling
Raygun
- Crash Reporting error data is retained for 180 days and Real User Monitoring sessions for only 60 days; longer retention is Enterprise only
- Crash Reporting, Real User Monitoring and APM are billed as three separate products, each metered on its own unit of errors, sessions or traces
- A Real User Monitoring session ends after 30 minutes of inactivity, so a single visit spanning breaks is billed as several sessions
- Usage beyond the plan allowance is billed on demand at $0.001 per error and $0.002 per session or trace
- Enterprise plan pricing is custom with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Coralogix
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Coralogix review.
Raygun
Free- FreeFree
- Crash reporting
- Real user monitoring
- Performance tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose Coralogix if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want machine learning analytics.
Choose Raygun if
- You need crash reporting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real user monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Coralogix or Raygun better?
- Neither clearly leads. Coralogix starts at Free and Raygun at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Coralogix or Raygun?
- Coralogix starts at Free and Raygun at Free.
- Does Coralogix or Raygun run on more platforms?
- Coralogix runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, Azure, GCP). Raygun runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Coralogix for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Coralogix best used for?
- Coralogix is most often used for enterprises requiring infinite log retention across logs, metrics, and traces, organizations with cross-signal correlation needs (logs, metrics, traces unified). Of those, enterprises requiring infinite log retention across logs, metrics, and traces and organizations with cross-signal correlation needs (logs, metrics, traces unified) are not what Raygun is typically brought in for.
- What can Coralogix do that Raygun cannot?
- Coralogix covers Log aggregation, Machine learning analytics, Alerts, Distributed tracing. Raygun covers Crash reporting, Real user monitoring, Performance tracking, Source maps. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Coralogix vs Elastic Stack
- Coralogix vs New Relic
- Coralogix vs Datadog Logs
- Coralogix vs Grafana Loki
- Coralogix vs CloudWatch
- Coralogix vs Dynatrace
- Coralogix vs InfluxDB
- Coralogix vs Airbrake
- Coralogix vs AppDynamics
- Coralogix vs Axiom
- Coralogix vs Azure Monitor
- Coralogix vs Better Stack
- Coralogix vs Bugsnag
- Coralogix vs Dynatrace Logs
- Coralogix vs Elastic
- Coralogix vs Elastic APM
- Coralogix vs Elasticsearch Service
- Coralogix vs ELK Stack
- Raygun vs Elastic Stack
- Raygun vs New Relic
- Raygun vs Datadog Logs
- Raygun vs Grafana Loki
- Raygun vs CloudWatch
- Raygun vs Dynatrace
- Raygun vs InfluxDB
- Raygun vs Airbrake
- Raygun vs AppDynamics
- Raygun vs Axiom
- Raygun vs Azure Monitor
- Raygun vs Better Stack
- Raygun vs Bugsnag
- Raygun vs Dynatrace Logs
- Raygun vs Elastic
- Raygun vs Elastic APM
- Raygun vs Elasticsearch Service
- Raygun vs ELK Stack


