Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Quantexa vs Rock Solid

Quantexa logo

Quantexa

Cybersecurity

Entity resolution and network analytics for financial crime investigation

From
On request
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite
Rock Solid logo

Rock Solid

Government

Parks and Recreation Management

From
$350/month
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • They diverge on capability: Quantexa covers Entity resolution, Rock Solid covers Program Registration.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Quantexa and Rock Solid actually diverge.

Attributes where Quantexa and Rock Solid differ
AttributeQuantexaRock Solid
Starting priceOn request$350/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, LinuxWeb, Ios, Android
CategoryCybersecurityGovernment
FoundedUnknown2001

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Quantexa

  • Entity resolution
  • Network generation
  • Contextual monitoring
  • Investigation workspace
  • Data fusion
  • Deployment on customer cloud

Only in Rock Solid

  • Program Registration
  • Facility Scheduling
  • Membership Management
  • Payment Processing
  • Reporting & Analytics
  • Payment Gateways
  • QuickBooks
  • Marketing Tools

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Quantexa

  • A bank whose AML alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them fasternot Rock Solid
  • Sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholdernot Rock Solid
  • Merging customer records across retail, commercial and wealth divisions after an acquisition to see total exposurenot Rock Solid
  • A tax or benefits agency looking for organised fraud rings rather than individual claimantsnot Rock Solid

Rock Solid

  • Citizen Servicesnot Quantexa
  • Records Managementnot Quantexa
  • Public Safetynot Quantexa
  • Civic Engagementnot Quantexa

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Quantexa

  • Pricing is never published and lands in the seven figure range annually for a tier one deployment, so it is out of reach for mid-sized institutions no matter how well the analytics would fit.
  • Output quality is bounded by input data quality, and organisations without governed customer data spend the first phase of the programme fixing feeds rather than catching criminals.
  • Implementation typically requires a systems integrator and runs into quarters rather than weeks, so the business case has to survive a long period with no operational benefit.
  • The platform augments rather than replaces existing transaction monitoring, so you keep paying for the incumbent system alongside it and total compliance technology spend rises before it falls.
  • Skills are scarce; the platform needs people who understand both Spark scale data engineering and financial crime typologies, and those people are hard to recruit and easy to lose.

Rock Solid

Nothing recorded yet. See the Rock Solid review.

Pricing, plan by plan

Quantexa

On request
  • Quantexa Platform$undefined/year
    • Entity resolution and network generation
    • Deployed in customer cloud tenancy
    • Priced by data volume and use case count

Rock Solid

$350/month
  • Recreation Management$350/month
    • Program Registration
    • Facility Scheduling
    • Payment Processing

Which should you pick?

Choose Quantexa if

  • You need entity resolution.
  • You work on Web, Linux.
  • You also want network generation.
Quantexa review

Choose Rock Solid if

  • You need program registration.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want facility scheduling.
Rock Solid review

Questions people ask

Is Quantexa or Rock Solid better?
Neither clearly leads. Quantexa starts at On request and Rock Solid at $350/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Quantexa or Rock Solid?
Quantexa starts at On request and Rock Solid at $350/month.
Does Quantexa or Rock Solid run on more platforms?
Quantexa runs on Web, Linux. Rock Solid runs on Web, Ios, Android.
What is Quantexa best used for?
Quantexa is most often used for a bank whose aml alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them faster, sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholder, merging customer records across retail, commercial and wealth divisions after an acquisition to see total exposure, a tax or benefits agency looking for organised fraud rings rather than individual claimants. Of those, a bank whose aml alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them faster and sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholder are not what Rock Solid is typically brought in for.
What can Quantexa do that Rock Solid cannot?
Quantexa covers Entity resolution, Network generation, Contextual monitoring, Investigation workspace. Rock Solid covers Program Registration, Facility Scheduling, Membership Management, Payment Processing.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Quantexa: Does Quantexa replace our transaction monitoring system?

No. It usually sits alongside it, adding network context to the alerts that system generates and to investigations.

Quantexa: Where does our data go?

Into your own cloud tenancy in the normal deployment model. Quantexa does not require you to send customer data to a shared multi-tenant service.

Quantexa: How is it priced?

Not publicly. Expect an annual subscription scaled by data volume and number of use cases, plus separate implementation cost.

Share

Related pages

More on Quantexa

More on Rock Solid

Keep looking

Other head to heads