Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs PROGNOST Systems

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

PROGNOST Systems
Manufacturing
SIL 3 rated online monitoring and diagnostics for reciprocating compressors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; PROGNOST Systems nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and PROGNOST Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | Augury | PROGNOST Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in PROGNOST Systems
- Segmented vibration analysis
- Dynamic rod position
- Online pV diagram
- Dynamic rod load
- SIL 3 machine protection
- Damage pattern library
- PROGNOST-Predictor
- Remote expert service
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot PROGNOST Systems
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot PROGNOST Systems
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot PROGNOST Systems
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot PROGNOST Systems
PROGNOST Systems
- A refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring systemnot Augury
- Replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one SIL 3 rated installationnot Augury
- Gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machinenot Augury
- A plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will acceptnot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
PROGNOST Systems
- Nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- Installation requires proximity probes, rod position sensors and pressure instrumentation on the machine, which usually means a planned outage and mechanical work before any data exists.
- The value is concentrated in reciprocating compressors; for general rotating equipment across a whole plant it is a far more expensive route than a broad vibration programme.
- SIL 3 certification brings the configuration into functional safety scope, so changes to thresholds and logic go through management of change rather than being adjusted by a reliability engineer.
- The company is small and German-based, so response times and spares logistics for remote sites depend on a partner network rather than a global direct service organisation.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
PROGNOST Systems
On request- PROGNOST-NT$undefined/year
- Priced per machine train as an instrumented system
- Sensors, proximity probes, rod position and pressure instrumentation included in scope
- Installation typically requires a machine outage for probe fitting
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose PROGNOST Systems if
- You need segmented vibration analysis.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want dynamic rod position.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or PROGNOST Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and PROGNOST Systems at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or PROGNOST Systems?
- Augury starts at On request and PROGNOST Systems at On request.
- Does Augury or PROGNOST Systems run on more platforms?
- Augury runs on Web, iOS, Android. PROGNOST Systems runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what PROGNOST Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that PROGNOST Systems cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Dynamic rod position, Online pV diagram, Dynamic rod load.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it replace the compressor protection system?
It can. PROGNOST-NT is SIL 3 rated for machine protection, which is the main reason sites choose it over advisory-only monitoring.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
PROGNOST Systems: Can it be retrofitted to an existing compressor?
Yes, but fitting rod position and internal instrumentation generally needs a machine outage.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it work on centrifugal machines?
PROGNOST offers products for general rotating equipment, but the differentiated diagnostics are for reciprocating compressors.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
PROGNOST Systems: Is it available on new Burckhardt machines?
Yes, Burckhardt Compression offers PROGNOST-NT as a factory-fitted condition monitoring option.
Related pages
More on PROGNOST Systems
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs Ignition
- Augury vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Augury vs Simplify3D
- Augury vs TrendMiner
- Augury vs Xometry
- Augury vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- PROGNOST Systems vs KCF Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sensemore
- PROGNOST Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- PROGNOST Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- PROGNOST Systems vs Petasense
- PROGNOST Systems vs MOVUS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Samotics
- PROGNOST Systems vs Poseidon Systems
- PROGNOST Systems vs eMaint
- PROGNOST Systems vs ABB 800xA
- PROGNOST Systems vs AVEVA System Platform
- PROGNOST Systems vs Hippo CMMS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- PROGNOST Systems vs 3YOURMIND
- PROGNOST Systems vs AMFG
- PROGNOST Systems vs Ignition
- PROGNOST Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PROGNOST Systems vs Simplify3D
- PROGNOST Systems vs TrendMiner
- PROGNOST Systems vs Xometry
- PROGNOST Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
