Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs Simplify3D

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Simplify3D
Manufacturing
Paid 3D printing slicer sold as a one-time licence in a market where rivals are free
- From
- $199/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; Simplify3D every serious competitor is free, so the $199 has to be justified against Cura, PrusaSlicer, OrcaSlicer and Bambu Studio on support and consistency alone, not on capability.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, Simplify3D covers Process-based slicing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and Simplify3D actually diverge.
| Attribute | Augury | Simplify3D |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $199/one-time |
| Pricing model | quote | One-time purchase |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in Simplify3D
- Process-based slicing
- Support generation
- Layer preview
- Floating licences
- Offline licensing
- Wide printer profiles
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot Simplify3D
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot Simplify3D
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot Simplify3D
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot Simplify3D
Simplify3D
- A print farm running machines from four manufacturers that wants one slicer and one set of profiles rather than fournot Augury
- An engineering department on an air-gapped network that cannot use a slicer requiring online activationnot Augury
- A team standardising support and infill settings across operators so prints are reproducible between shiftsnot Augury
- A shop printing tall parts that need different settings at different heights in a single jobnot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
Simplify3D
- Every serious competitor is free, so the $199 has to be justified against Cura, PrusaSlicer, OrcaSlicer and Bambu Studio on support and consistency alone, not on capability.
- Major version upgrades are chargeable, so the perpetual licence covers a version rather than the product and the cost recurs every few years anyway.
- Development cadence is slower than the open source slicers, and features such as newer tree support algorithms and multi-material handling appear there first.
- Printer profiles for very new machines lag behind the manufacturer's own bundled slicer, so buyers of a brand new printer may get better results from the free tool that shipped with it.
- Standard licences require an internet connection to activate, and the offline option is a separate purchase negotiated with sales rather than a checkbox at checkout.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
Simplify3D
$199/one-time- Standard licence$199/one-time
- One user, perpetual for that version
- Internet activation required
- Two week money-back guarantee
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared activation pool for teams
- Priced on request
- Volume discounts available
- Offline licence$undefined/one-time
- Activation without internet access
- For secure or air-gapped networks
- Priced on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose Simplify3D if
- You need process-based slicing.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want support generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or Simplify3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and Simplify3D at $199/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or Simplify3D?
- Augury starts at On request and Simplify3D at $199/one-time.
- Does Augury or Simplify3D run on more platforms?
- Augury runs on Web, iOS, Android. Simplify3D runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what Simplify3D is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that Simplify3D cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. Simplify3D covers Process-based slicing, Support generation, Layer preview, Floating licences.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
Simplify3D: Is Simplify3D a subscription?
No. It is a one-time purchase of $199 per user, but upgrades to future major versions cost extra.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
Simplify3D: Why pay when PrusaSlicer and Cura are free?
For a mixed fleet you get one interface and one profile library across brands, plus a supplier to call. If you run one printer from one vendor, the free slicer is usually the better choice.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
Simplify3D: Can I install it on more than one computer?
A standard licence is per user with online activation. Teams needing shared or concurrent use buy floating licences, priced on request.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
Simplify3D: Can I try it first?
There is a two week money-back guarantee rather than a free trial download.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs Formlabs PreForm
- Augury vs Markforged Eiger
- Augury vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Augury vs GrabCAD Print
- Augury vs Materialise Magics
- Augury vs Oqton
- Augury vs Dyndrite
- Augury vs Protolabs
- Augury vs Authentise
- Augury vs Fictiv
- Augury vs Xometry
- Augury vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Augury vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Augury vs LabVIEW
- Simplify3D vs KCF Technologies
- Simplify3D vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Simplify3D vs Sensemore
- Simplify3D vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Simplify3D vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Simplify3D vs Erbessd Instruments
- Simplify3D vs PROGNOST Systems
- Simplify3D vs Petasense
- Simplify3D vs MOVUS
- Simplify3D vs Samotics
- Simplify3D vs Poseidon Systems
- Simplify3D vs eMaint
- Simplify3D vs ABB 800xA
- Simplify3D vs AVEVA System Platform
- Simplify3D vs Hippo CMMS
- Simplify3D vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Simplify3D vs 3YOURMIND
- Simplify3D vs AMFG
- Simplify3D vs Formlabs PreForm
- Simplify3D vs Markforged Eiger
- Simplify3D vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Simplify3D vs GrabCAD Print
- Simplify3D vs Materialise Magics
- Simplify3D vs Oqton
- Simplify3D vs Dyndrite
- Simplify3D vs Protolabs
- Simplify3D vs Authentise
- Simplify3D vs Fictiv
- Simplify3D vs Xometry
- Simplify3D vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Simplify3D vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Simplify3D vs LabVIEW
