Databases · head to head
PlanetScale vs Spacelift

PlanetScale
Databases
The MySQL-compatible serverless database
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- PlanetScale is a MySQL-compatible serverless database platform.
- Spacelift is free; PlanetScale starts at $15/mo.
- Only PlanetScale lists database Branching; only Spacelift lists multi-tool orchestration.
- Where PlanetScale falls short: pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions.
- Where Spacelift falls short: three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and Spacelift actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | Spacelift |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | By private worker and tier, not by user |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Self-hosted |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Spacelift.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Spacelift
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Spacelift
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Spacelift
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Spacelift
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot PlanetScale
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot PlanetScale
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot PlanetScale
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot PlanetScale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/mo
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/mo
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter PlusOn request
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- BusinessOn request
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- EnterpriseOn request
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want policy as code.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or Spacelift better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at Free and Spacelift at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or Spacelift?
- PlanetScale starts at Free and Spacelift at Free.
- Does PlanetScale or Spacelift run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Web. Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use PlanetScale for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling, postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations, multi-region database deployments on aws or gcp, applications requiring transparent sharding via vitess. Of those, mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling and postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations are not what Spacelift is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that Spacelift cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceSpacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
PlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
PlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
PlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceSpacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Spacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs Xata
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Cloudinary
- PlanetScale vs Convex
- PlanetScale vs Dgraph
- PlanetScale vs Dragonfly
- PlanetScale vs Dremio
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs Atlantis
- PlanetScale vs Earthly
- PlanetScale vs Harness
- PlanetScale vs Terraform
- PlanetScale vs Cortex
- PlanetScale vs OpsLevel
- PlanetScale vs Backstage
- PlanetScale vs Envoy
- PlanetScale vs Istio
- PlanetScale vs Okteto
- PlanetScale vs Kubernetes
- PlanetScale vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- PlanetScale vs Eclipse
- PlanetScale vs Garden
- PlanetScale vs GitLab CI/CD
- PlanetScale vs HCP Terraform
- PlanetScale vs Helm
- PlanetScale vs Jenkins
- Spacelift vs Amazon Aurora
- Spacelift vs Nile
- Spacelift vs Cockroach Labs
- Spacelift vs PostgreSQL
- Spacelift vs BigQuery
- Spacelift vs MotherDuck
- Spacelift vs FaunaDB
- Spacelift vs DataGrip
- Spacelift vs TiDB
- Spacelift vs Readyset
- Spacelift vs Xata
- Spacelift vs Chroma
- Spacelift vs Cloudinary
- Spacelift vs Convex
- Spacelift vs Dgraph
- Spacelift vs Dragonfly
- Spacelift vs Dremio
- Spacelift vs DynamoDB
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Terraform
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Envoy
- Spacelift vs Istio
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Kubernetes
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs Eclipse
- Spacelift vs Garden
- Spacelift vs GitLab CI/CD
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Helm
- Spacelift vs Jenkins
