Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Spacelift

Cockroach Labs
Databases
The cloud-native distributed SQL database
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Both are free.
- Only Cockroach Labs lists distributed SQL; only Spacelift lists policy as code.
- Where Cockroach Labs falls short: basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only).
- Where Spacelift falls short: three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Spacelift actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Spacelift |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | By private worker and tier, not by user |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Web, Self-hosted |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Spacelift.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Spacelift
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Spacelift
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Cockroach Labs
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Cockroach Labs
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Cockroach Labs
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter PlusOn request
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- BusinessOn request
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- EnterpriseOn request
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want policy as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Spacelift better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Spacelift at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Spacelift?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Spacelift at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Spacelift run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Spacelift is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Spacelift cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceSpacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Cockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Cockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Cockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceSpacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Cockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceSpacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Nile
- Cockroach Labs vs Vitess
- Cockroach Labs vs Aiven
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Redis
- Cockroach Labs vs Supabase
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Meilisearch
- Cockroach Labs vs NATS
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Flink
- Cockroach Labs vs Atlantis
- Cockroach Labs vs Earthly
- Cockroach Labs vs Harness
- Cockroach Labs vs Terraform
- Cockroach Labs vs Cortex
- Cockroach Labs vs OpsLevel
- Cockroach Labs vs Backstage
- Cockroach Labs vs Envoy
- Cockroach Labs vs Istio
- Cockroach Labs vs Okteto
- Cockroach Labs vs Kubernetes
- Cockroach Labs vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cockroach Labs vs Eclipse
- Cockroach Labs vs Garden
- Cockroach Labs vs GitLab CI/CD
- Cockroach Labs vs HCP Terraform
- Cockroach Labs vs Helm
- Cockroach Labs vs Jenkins
- Spacelift vs YugabyteDB
- Spacelift vs PostgreSQL
- Spacelift vs Google Cloud SQL
- Spacelift vs Amazon Aurora
- Spacelift vs Oracle Database
- Spacelift vs TiDB
- Spacelift vs CosmosDB
- Spacelift vs Nile
- Spacelift vs Vitess
- Spacelift vs Aiven
- Spacelift vs PlanetScale
- Spacelift vs Redis
- Spacelift vs Supabase
- Spacelift vs Apache Druid
- Spacelift vs Meilisearch
- Spacelift vs NATS
- Spacelift vs Azure SQL
- Spacelift vs Apache Flink
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Terraform
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Envoy
- Spacelift vs Istio
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Kubernetes
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs Eclipse
- Spacelift vs Garden
- Spacelift vs GitLab CI/CD
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Helm
- Spacelift vs Jenkins
