Developer Tools · head to head
Envoy vs PlanetScale

Envoy
Developer Tools
A high-performance L7 proxy written in C++ that is configured by an API rather than a config file, and is usually deployed under a control plane.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

PlanetScale
Databases
The MySQL-compatible serverless database
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- PlanetScale is a MySQL-compatible serverless database platform.
- Envoy is free; PlanetScale starts at $15/mo.
- Only Envoy lists xDS dynamic configuration; only PlanetScale lists database Branching.
- Where PlanetScale falls short: pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Envoy and PlanetScale actually diverge.
| Attribute | Envoy | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source | Usage-based |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web).
Not yet recorded: founded for Envoy.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Envoy
- xDS dynamic configuration
- Protocol breadth
- Filter chain architecture
- Observability by default
- Outlier detection
- Traffic shaping
- mTLS termination and origination
- Hot restart
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Envoy
- Acting as the data plane under a service mesh or Gateway API implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use itnot PlanetScale
- An edge or API gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxyingnot PlanetScale
- Migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow trafficnot PlanetScale
- Standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written innot PlanetScale
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Envoy
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Envoy
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Envoy
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Envoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Envoy
- The configuration surface is very large and hand-written bootstrap YAML runs to hundreds of lines for routing that Nginx expresses in twenty, which is why nearly every production deployment sits under a control plane and inherits that control plane's constraints as well
- xDS is the real API and it is not stable in the comfortable sense; the v2 API set was removed outright, resource types continue to be deprecated, and your control plane and Envoy binaries have to be upgraded roughly in step or the proxies stop accepting configuration
- Extending it properly means writing a C++ filter and building and maintaining your own Envoy binary; the alternatives are Lua, which adds per-request overhead, and proxy-wasm, whose ABI has remained effectively experimental for years with a real performance cost
- At sidecar density the per-proxy memory and CPU footprint is a measurable share of cluster capacity, since thousands of workloads each carry a full proxy, and this is precisely the cost that has pushed mesh projects towards node-level or ambient architectures
- There is no single vendor selling support for Envoy itself; you get the community plus control-plane vendors such as Solo.io and Tetrate, so an Envoy-level production bug is your own engineers in a C++ codebase unless a support contract happens to cover it
- Diagnosing why a request got a particular response involves reading config dumps, the stats endpoint and the RESPONSE_FLAGS codes in access logs rather than a readable error, which is a specific skill you must hire or spend months growing
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Pricing, plan by plan
Envoy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Envoy review.
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/mo
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/mo
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Which should you pick?
Choose Envoy if
- You need xds dynamic configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want protocol breadth.
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is Envoy or PlanetScale better?
- Neither clearly leads. Envoy starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Envoy or PlanetScale?
- Envoy starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free.
- Does Envoy or PlanetScale run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Envoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Envoy best used for?
- Envoy is most often used for acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it, an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying, migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow traffic, standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written in. Of those, acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it and an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying are not what PlanetScale is typically brought in for.
- What can Envoy do that PlanetScale cannot?
- Envoy covers xDS dynamic configuration, Protocol breadth, Filter chain architecture, Observability by default. PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Envoy: Should I run Envoy on its own, or under a control plane?
Almost always under one. Directly authoring xDS or static bootstrap configuration is viable for a handful of routes and becomes unmanageable beyond that. Envoy Gateway, Istio, Contour, Gloo and Consul all exist to generate that configuration for you.
PlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceEnvoy: How does it compare with Nginx or HAProxy?
Envoy is dynamically configured over an API and instrumented far more heavily; Nginx and HAProxy are faster to configure and lighter for straightforward reverse proxying. If you never need to change routing without a reload, Envoy is more machinery than the problem requires.
PlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceEnvoy: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence; it is Apache 2.0 and there is no paid edition. The cost is engineering time and, for most organisations, a commercial control plane or cloud service that packages it.
PlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourceEnvoy: Can I write extensions without C++?
You can write Lua filters or proxy-wasm modules in Rust, Go, C++ or AssemblyScript. Both carry per-request overhead compared with a native filter, and the Wasm path has been slower to stabilise than the project originally projected.
PlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceEnvoy: Is it a CNCF project?
Yes, it is a graduated CNCF project licensed under Apache 2.0, which means the trademark and governance sit with the foundation rather than with Lyft or any vendor.
Related pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- Envoy vs Istio
- Envoy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Envoy vs Spacelift
- Envoy vs Atlantis
- Envoy vs Jenkins
- Envoy vs Hookdeck
- Envoy vs Restate
- Envoy vs Helix
- Envoy vs Turborepo
- Envoy vs StackBlitz
- Envoy vs Webpack
- Envoy vs Backstage
- Envoy vs OpsLevel
- Envoy vs PartyKit
- Envoy vs PhpStorm
- Envoy vs Pieces for Developers
- Envoy vs RAD Studio
- Envoy vs Refact
- Envoy vs Amazon Aurora
- Envoy vs Nile
- Envoy vs Cockroach Labs
- Envoy vs PostgreSQL
- Envoy vs BigQuery
- Envoy vs MotherDuck
- Envoy vs FaunaDB
- Envoy vs DataGrip
- Envoy vs TiDB
- Envoy vs Readyset
- Envoy vs Xata
- Envoy vs Chroma
- Envoy vs Cloudinary
- Envoy vs Convex
- Envoy vs Dgraph
- Envoy vs Dragonfly
- Envoy vs Dremio
- Envoy vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs Istio
- PlanetScale vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- PlanetScale vs Spacelift
- PlanetScale vs Atlantis
- PlanetScale vs Jenkins
- PlanetScale vs Hookdeck
- PlanetScale vs Restate
- PlanetScale vs Helix
- PlanetScale vs Turborepo
- PlanetScale vs StackBlitz
- PlanetScale vs Webpack
- PlanetScale vs Backstage
- PlanetScale vs OpsLevel
- PlanetScale vs PartyKit
- PlanetScale vs PhpStorm
- PlanetScale vs Pieces for Developers
- PlanetScale vs RAD Studio
- PlanetScale vs Refact
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs Xata
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Cloudinary
- PlanetScale vs Convex
- PlanetScale vs Dgraph
- PlanetScale vs Dragonfly
- PlanetScale vs Dremio
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
