Developer Tools · head to head
Harness vs PlanetScale

Harness
Developer Tools
Software delivery platform across CI, CD, security testing and cost management
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

PlanetScale
Databases
The MySQL-compatible serverless database
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- PlanetScale is a MySQL-compatible serverless database platform.
- Harness is free; PlanetScale starts at $15/mo.
- Where Harness falls short: essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates.
- Where PlanetScale falls short: pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Harness and PlanetScale actually diverge.
| Attribute | Harness | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Usage-based |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web).
Not yet recorded: founded for Harness.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Harness
Nothing recorded that PlanetScale does not also cover.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Harness
- Deploying apps to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud with rollbacksnot PlanetScale
- Integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before productionnot PlanetScale
- Automating cloud cost reduction and tracking unit-level expensesnot PlanetScale
- Enabling developers to provision infrastructure without operations bottlenecksnot PlanetScale
- Assessing deployment frequency and lead time productivity metricsnot PlanetScale
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Harness
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Harness
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Harness
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Harness
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Harness
- Essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates
- DevOps Essentials has no on-premises deployment option
- Internal Developer Portal requires minimum 20 developer licenses
- Pipeline execution history retention 6 months (Essentials) vs 25 months as add-on (Enterprise)
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Pricing, plan by plan
Harness
Free- FreeFree
- Starter platform for software delivery lifecycle
- Open source options available (Harness Open Source, Litmus Chaos)
- EssentialsOn request
- Growing organizations with small to mid-size teams
- Packaged DevOps Essentials bundle
- Continuous software delivery capabilities
- EnterpriseOn request
- Large-scale organizations
- Pick any modules based on needs
- Advanced features
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/mo
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/mo
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is Harness or PlanetScale better?
- Neither clearly leads. Harness starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Harness or PlanetScale?
- Harness starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free.
- Does Harness or PlanetScale run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Harness for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Harness best used for?
- Harness is most often used for deploying apps to aws, azure, and google cloud with rollbacks, integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before production, automating cloud cost reduction and tracking unit-level expenses, enabling developers to provision infrastructure without operations bottlenecks. Of those, deploying apps to aws, azure, and google cloud with rollbacks and integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before production are not what PlanetScale is typically brought in for.
- What can Harness do that PlanetScale cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Harness: Is there a free Harness plan?
Yes, Harness offers a free plan for individual developers and small teams with open source options including Harness Open Source and Litmus Chaos.
SourcePlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceHarness: What are Harness's paid pricing tiers?
Harness offers Essentials for growing teams and Enterprise for large-scale organizations. Both require contacting sales for custom pricing. Pricing is based on modules and features selected.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceHarness: Can Harness be deployed on-premises?
Enterprise plans include self-managed platform deployment option. DevOps Essentials bundle does not offer on-premises deployment.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- Harness vs Spacelift
- Harness vs Atlantis
- Harness vs Backstage
- Harness vs Octopus Deploy
- Harness vs HCP Terraform
- Harness vs Argo CD
- Harness vs Blacksmith
- Harness vs Garden
- Harness vs WarpBuild
- Harness vs Namespace
- Harness vs Kubernetes
- Harness vs LaunchDarkly
- Harness vs Rust
- Harness vs StackBlitz
- Harness vs Steampipe
- Harness vs Tilt
- Harness vs Vim
- Harness vs Webpack
- Harness vs Amazon Aurora
- Harness vs Nile
- Harness vs Cockroach Labs
- Harness vs PostgreSQL
- Harness vs BigQuery
- Harness vs MotherDuck
- Harness vs FaunaDB
- Harness vs DataGrip
- Harness vs TiDB
- Harness vs Readyset
- Harness vs Xata
- Harness vs Chroma
- Harness vs Cloudinary
- Harness vs Convex
- Harness vs Dgraph
- Harness vs Dragonfly
- Harness vs Dremio
- Harness vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs Spacelift
- PlanetScale vs Atlantis
- PlanetScale vs Backstage
- PlanetScale vs Octopus Deploy
- PlanetScale vs HCP Terraform
- PlanetScale vs Argo CD
- PlanetScale vs Blacksmith
- PlanetScale vs Garden
- PlanetScale vs WarpBuild
- PlanetScale vs Namespace
- PlanetScale vs Kubernetes
- PlanetScale vs LaunchDarkly
- PlanetScale vs Rust
- PlanetScale vs StackBlitz
- PlanetScale vs Steampipe
- PlanetScale vs Tilt
- PlanetScale vs Vim
- PlanetScale vs Webpack
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs Xata
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Cloudinary
- PlanetScale vs Convex
- PlanetScale vs Dgraph
- PlanetScale vs Dragonfly
- PlanetScale vs Dremio
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
