Business Intelligence · head to head
Evidence vs Phocas

Evidence
Business Intelligence
Business intelligence as code for teams and AI agents
- From
- $2500/month
- Rated
- -

Phocas
Business Intelligence
Pre-built BI and FP&A for wholesale distributors and manufacturers running mid-market ERPs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Evidence high starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption; Phocas the value is the pre-built vertical content, so a company outside distribution, manufacturing or retail pays premium prices for dashboards it must build itself anyway.
- They diverge on capability: Evidence covers Analytics Agent, Phocas covers ERP connectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evidence and Phocas actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Business Intelligence).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evidence
- Analytics Agent
- Code-based infrastructure
- Development environment
- Visualization tools
- Embedded analytics
- Enterprise security
- Multi-channel access
Only in Phocas
- ERP connectors
- Pre-built distribution content
- Grid-first analysis
- Financial statements
- Budgets and forecasts
- Rebates module
- Alerts and subscriptions
- Mobile apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evidence
- Building version-controlled analytics infrastructurenot Phocas
- Enabling AI agents to answer business questionsnot Phocas
- Delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, Slack, ChatGPT)not Phocas
- Embedding white-labeled analytics in productsnot Phocas
Phocas
- A wholesale distributor on Prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writernot Evidence
- A manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheetnot Evidence
- A multi-branch retailer comparing branch and product performance daily without an internal BI teamnot Evidence
- A private equity owner standardising reporting across several acquired distributors on different ERPsnot Evidence
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evidence
- High starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption
- No freemium option for evaluation or learning
- Code-based approach has steeper learning curve than visual tools
- AI credits limited on Team plan; additional credits cost extra
- Requires Git workflow familiarity for effective collaboration
Phocas
- The value is the pre-built vertical content, so a company outside distribution, manufacturing or retail pays premium prices for dashboards it must build itself anyway.
- If your ERP is not on the maintained connector list you fall back to generic database extraction and lose the fast time to value that justifies the price.
- The visualisation library is thin next to Power BI or Tableau, and analysts who want fine control over chart design will find it constraining.
- Pricing is quoted per user and never published, and buyers routinely report large gaps between initial and renewal quotes with limited comparison leverage.
- Modules are licensed separately, so a customer who bought Analytics and later wants Financial Statements or Rebates faces a new negotiation rather than an upgrade.
Pricing, plan by plan
Evidence
$2500/month- Team$2500/month
- Unlimited users
- Monthly billing
- Analytics Agent
- Enterprise$null/custom
- All Team features
- SSO/SAML authentication
- SCIM directory sync
Phocas
On request- Phocas$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted by user count and modules
- Analytics, Financial Statements, Budgets and Rebates licensed separately
- One-off implementation and ERP connector setup fee
Which should you pick?
Choose Evidence if
- You need analytics agent.
- You work on Cloud, Embedded.
- You also want code-based infrastructure.
Choose Phocas if
- You need erp connectors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pre-built distribution content.
Questions people ask
- Is Evidence or Phocas better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evidence starts at $2500/month and Phocas at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evidence or Phocas?
- Evidence starts at $2500/month and Phocas at On request.
- Does Evidence or Phocas run on more platforms?
- Evidence runs on Cloud, Embedded. Phocas runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Evidence best used for?
- Evidence is most often used for building version-controlled analytics infrastructure, enabling ai agents to answer business questions, delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, slack, chatgpt), embedding white-labeled analytics in products. Of those, building version-controlled analytics infrastructure and enabling ai agents to answer business questions are not what Phocas is typically brought in for.
- What can Evidence do that Phocas cannot?
- Evidence covers Analytics Agent, Code-based infrastructure, Development environment, Visualization tools. Phocas covers ERP connectors, Pre-built distribution content, Grid-first analysis, Financial statements.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Evidence: Does Evidence have per-user pricing?
No, Evidence offers one flat price for unlimited users at $2,500/month on the Team plan with a 30-day free trial.
SourcePhocas: What does Phocas cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted annually by user count and module, with a separate implementation fee, and varies by region.
Evidence: How many AI credits come with Team plan?
Team plan includes 20,000 AI credits monthly at $0.01 per additional credit. Enterprise offers custom credit packages.
SourcePhocas: Is it worth it over Power BI?
Only if you are in its target verticals on a supported ERP. Power BI is far cheaper per seat but you supply the data model.
Evidence: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise adds SSO/SAML, SCIM directory sync, row-level access rules, embedding capabilities, and custom deployment options at custom pricing.
SourcePhocas: Does it replace my ERP reporting?
It replaces day-to-day analysis and sales reporting. Transactional and statutory reporting stays in the ERP.
Phocas: Can it do budgeting?
Yes, through a separately licensed Financial Statements and Budgets module on the same warehouse.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Evidence vs Cube
- Evidence vs Zenlytic
- Evidence vs Hex
- Evidence vs Fabi
- Evidence vs Rill Data
- Evidence vs GoodData
- Evidence vs Grow
- Evidence vs Sisense
- Evidence vs MicroStrategy
- Evidence vs Anaplan
- Evidence vs Deepnote
- Evidence vs Mode
- Evidence vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Evidence vs Periscope Data
- Evidence vs Zoho Analytics
- Evidence vs Baremetrics
- Evidence vs Board International
- Evidence vs Power BI
- Evidence vs Domo
- Evidence vs Jedox
- Evidence vs Cyfe
- Evidence vs DashThis
- Evidence vs Luzmo
- Evidence vs Quid
- Evidence vs Snowplow
- Evidence vs Stripe Dashboard
- Evidence vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Evidence vs Yellowfin
- Evidence vs Zebra BI
- Phocas vs Cube
- Phocas vs Zenlytic
- Phocas vs Hex
- Phocas vs Fabi
- Phocas vs Rill Data
- Phocas vs GoodData
- Phocas vs Grow
- Phocas vs Sisense
- Phocas vs MicroStrategy
- Phocas vs Anaplan
- Phocas vs Deepnote
- Phocas vs Mode
- Phocas vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Phocas vs Periscope Data
- Phocas vs Zoho Analytics
- Phocas vs Baremetrics
- Phocas vs Board International
- Phocas vs Power BI
- Phocas vs Domo
- Phocas vs Jedox
- Phocas vs Cyfe
- Phocas vs DashThis
- Phocas vs Luzmo
- Phocas vs Quid
- Phocas vs Snowplow
- Phocas vs Stripe Dashboard
- Phocas vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Phocas vs Yellowfin
- Phocas vs Zebra BI
