Manufacturing · head to head
ABB 800xA vs Petasense

ABB 800xA
Manufacturing
Distributed control system and process automation platform for continuous and hybrid process plants
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Petasense
Manufacturing
Wireless vibration and asset reliability monitoring, now owned by AssetWatch
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ABB 800xA licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.; Petasense petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- They diverge on capability: ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, Petasense covers Vibration Mote.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ABB 800xA and Petasense actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ABB 800xA
- Extended Automation
- AC 800M controllers
- Connectivity servers
- Safety integration
- IEC 61850 electrical
- Batch management
- Information management
- Asset optimisation
Only in Petasense
- Vibration Mote
- Transmitter range
- ARO cloud
- VFD-specific monitoring
- Reliability workflow
- Mixed wired and wireless
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ABB 800xA
- A refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in placenot Petasense
- A pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplacenot Petasense
- A mining operation that needs SIL 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety systemnot Petasense
- A marine or offshore platform where ABB already supplies the electrical distribution and IEC 61850 integration removes a second systemnot Petasense
Petasense
- A reliability team wanting continuous vibration data on assets currently covered by a quarterly walkaround routenot ABB 800xA
- A plant with variable frequency drive assets where generic vibration analytics produce too many false alarmsnot ABB 800xA
- Mixing battery sensors on accessible pumps with wired sensors on the handful of assets that would stop productionnot ABB 800xA
- A manufacturer with no in-house vibration analyst that wants the analysis delivered as a service rather than as a dashboardnot ABB 800xA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ABB 800xA
- Licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.
- Engineering and commissioning typically cost more than the software and controller hardware together, and that share is not visible in the initial ABB quotation, which prices the system rather than the project.
- It is Windows only for servers and workplaces, so the operating system lifecycle drives forced upgrade cycles that have nothing to do with your process.
- Once configured, the aspect object model and the specific integrator conventions used make handing the system to a different service provider expensive; ABB service contracts are effectively sticky.
- Software maintenance is an annual contract on top of the licence and lapsing it means you cannot take version upgrades, so the system quietly ages out of security support if the plant skips renewals to save money.
Petasense
- Petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- Hardware is required per measurement point and gateways are required per area, so the up-front capital for a plant-wide deployment is substantial and separate from the subscription.
- Per-asset subscription pricing scales linearly, which makes full coverage of a large population of low-value motors uneconomic compared with route-based monitoring.
- Nothing is published on sensor cost, subscription rate, gateway requirements or contract length, so a total cost of ownership figure requires a full sales engagement before you can compare it against anything.
- Battery-powered wireless sensors trade measurement richness for battery life, so the sampling rate and resolution are lower than a wired analyser would give, which limits diagnosis of high-frequency bearing defects on critical machines.
Pricing, plan by plan
ABB 800xA
On request- ABB Ability System 800xA$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients
- Sold as a project through ABB or a certified partner
- Annual software maintenance contract priced separately
Petasense
On request- Petasense ARO$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- Vibration Mote or Transmitter hardware required per measurement point
- Gateway hardware required for wireless deployments
Which should you pick?
Choose ABB 800xA if
- You need extended automation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want ac 800m controllers.
Choose Petasense if
- You need vibration mote.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want transmitter range.
Questions people ask
- Is ABB 800xA or Petasense better?
- Neither clearly leads. ABB 800xA starts at On request and Petasense at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ABB 800xA or Petasense?
- ABB 800xA starts at On request and Petasense at On request.
- Does ABB 800xA or Petasense run on more platforms?
- ABB 800xA runs on Windows. Petasense runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- What is ABB 800xA best used for?
- ABB 800xA is most often used for a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place, a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace, a mining operation that needs sil 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety system, a marine or offshore platform where abb already supplies the electrical distribution and iec 61850 integration removes a second system. Of those, a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place and a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace are not what Petasense is typically brought in for.
- What can ABB 800xA do that Petasense cannot?
- ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, AC 800M controllers, Connectivity servers, Safety integration. Petasense covers Vibration Mote, Transmitter range, ARO cloud, VFD-specific monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ABB 800xA: Is 800xA sold as a perpetual licence?
Yes, the system licence is perpetual, but a separate annual software maintenance agreement is required to receive updates and version upgrades.
Petasense: Is Petasense still a separate product?
Yes. It trades under its own name with its own product line, but the owner since January 2024 is AssetWatch.
ABB 800xA: Can 800xA control non-ABB field hardware?
Yes. Connectivity servers front third-party PLC and DCS systems and legacy ABB families, which is the main reason it wins brownfield projects.
Petasense: Do I have to buy Petasense hardware?
Yes. The platform is built around its own Motes and Transmitters; it is not a bring-your-own-sensor analytics product.
ABB 800xA: Does it replace a separate electrical SCADA?
It can. IEC 61850 substation integration is native, so many plants drop a separate electrical monitoring system.
Petasense: Can I get monitoring as a service?
Yes, through parent AssetWatch, whose model is condition monitoring engineers reviewing your data. Clarify which model your quote covers.
ABB 800xA: What is the realistic implementation timeline?
A full plant migration is measured in years, not months; phased cutovers of one unit at a time are the norm.
Petasense: How is it priced?
Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensors and gateways. Nothing is published.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ABB 800xA vs AVEVA System Platform
- ABB 800xA vs Ignition
- ABB 800xA vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- ABB 800xA vs GENESIS Version 11
- ABB 800xA vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- ABB 800xA vs COPA-DATA zenon
- ABB 800xA vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- ABB 800xA vs Authentise
- ABB 800xA vs Kepware Server
- ABB 800xA vs QAD Redzone
- ABB 800xA vs Samotics
- ABB 800xA vs Sight Machine
- ABB 800xA vs Simplify3D
- ABB 800xA vs TrendMiner
- ABB 800xA vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs Xometry
- ABB 800xA vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- ABB 800xA vs SKF Enlight Centre
- ABB 800xA vs MOVUS
- ABB 800xA vs Augury
- ABB 800xA vs eMaint
- ABB 800xA vs KCF Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs Erbessd Instruments
- ABB 800xA vs Sensemore
- ABB 800xA vs Poseidon Systems
- ABB 800xA vs PROGNOST Systems
- ABB 800xA vs Maintenance Connection
- ABB 800xA vs Markforged Eiger
- ABB 800xA vs Materialise Magics
- ABB 800xA vs Oden Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs OpenBOM
- Petasense vs AVEVA System Platform
- Petasense vs Ignition
- Petasense vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Petasense vs GENESIS Version 11
- Petasense vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Petasense vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Petasense vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Petasense vs Authentise
- Petasense vs Kepware Server
- Petasense vs QAD Redzone
- Petasense vs Samotics
- Petasense vs Sight Machine
- Petasense vs Simplify3D
- Petasense vs TrendMiner
- Petasense vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Petasense vs Xometry
- Petasense vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Petasense vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Petasense vs MOVUS
- Petasense vs Augury
- Petasense vs eMaint
- Petasense vs KCF Technologies
- Petasense vs Erbessd Instruments
- Petasense vs Sensemore
- Petasense vs Poseidon Systems
- Petasense vs PROGNOST Systems
- Petasense vs Maintenance Connection
- Petasense vs Markforged Eiger
- Petasense vs Materialise Magics
- Petasense vs Oden Technologies
- Petasense vs OpenBOM
