Softwr

Payroll · head to head

EnKash vs Payhawk

EnKash logo

EnKash

Payroll

Indian corporate card and spend management platform holding an RBI prepaid payment instrument licence

From
On request
Rated
-
Payhawk logo

Payhawk

Payroll

Modular spend management combining corporate cards, accounts payable, procurement and travel

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: EnKash it is built specifically for Indian regulation and payment rails, so a multinational needs a separate platform for spend outside India, undermining any single-vendor global spend management strategy.; Payhawk buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.
  • They diverge on capability: EnKash covers Corporate card ecosystem, Payhawk covers Corporate cards.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EnKash and Payhawk actually diverge.

Attributes where EnKash and Payhawk differ
AttributeEnKashPayhawk
Pricing modelquotePer module per month

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Payroll).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EnKash

  • Corporate card ecosystem
  • UPI-linked petty cash wallets
  • Real-time compliance controls
  • AI receipt management
  • PPI licence issuance
  • Expense management software

Only in Payhawk

  • Corporate cards
  • Accounts payable automation
  • Procurement module
  • Travel booking
  • ERP integrations
  • Multi-entity consolidation

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EnKash

  • An Indian business replacing branch-level petty cash handling with UPI-linked digital walletsnot Payhawk
  • A finance team wanting real-time merchant category restrictions on employee card spendnot Payhawk
  • A company wanting tax-saving benefit cards issued alongside standard expense cardsnot Payhawk
  • An enterprise wanting a prepaid card issuer with its own RBI licence rather than a reseller of a bank's licencenot Payhawk

Payhawk

  • A multi-entity European business wanting one system for cards, expenses and payables across currenciesnot EnKash
  • A finance team that wants to price spend management before a sales call rather than negotiating blindnot EnKash
  • A company wanting only accounts payable automation without paying for card issuing it does not neednot EnKash
  • A mid-market business standardising ERP-integrated expense reporting ahead of a fundraise or auditnot EnKash

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EnKash

  • It is built specifically for Indian regulation and payment rails, so a multinational needs a separate platform for spend outside India, undermining any single-vendor global spend management strategy.
  • Pricing is entirely unpublished, so a finance team cannot budget the platform before a sales conversation.
  • Holding its own PPI licence reduces reliance on a bank partner but does not remove regulatory risk entirely, since RBI rules on prepaid instruments and card issuance in India have changed materially in recent years and can change again.
  • As a full-stack ecosystem spanning cards, wallets and expense software, adoption benefits most companies that commit to most of the modules together, which raises switching cost once implemented.
  • Independent published benchmarks on uptime, dispute resolution speed and support responsiveness are thin compared with more established global spend platforms.

Payhawk

  • Buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.
  • The unlimited-seats model is a poor fit for a company issuing cards to only a handful of employees, since the fixed module price does not scale down.
  • Card issuing depends on Payhawk's own banking partners rather than a company's existing bank, so switching away later means reissuing cards and re-training staff on a new tool.
  • Procurement is a separate paid module rather than a built-in feature, so a company evaluating "Payhawk" from marketing material may be looking at capability it has not actually bought.
  • International card acceptance and FX handling vary by market, and companies with material spend outside Europe report gaps compared to global card issuers.

Pricing, plan by plan

EnKash

On request
  • EnKash$undefined/year
    • Pricing not published, quote based on card volume and modules
    • Corporate card, expense management and UPI wallet modules available separately or bundled

Payhawk

On request
  • Travel$299/month
    • Integrated travel booking
    • Unlimited employee seats
  • Accounts Payable$349/month
    • Invoice capture and approval routing
    • Unlimited document processing
  • Cards and Expenses$449/month
    • Unlimited card transactions
    • Multi-entity expense management
  • Procurement$499/month
    • Purchase request and approval workflow
    • Vendor management

Which should you pick?

Choose EnKash if

  • You need corporate card ecosystem.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want upi-linked petty cash wallets.

Choose Payhawk if

  • You need corporate cards.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want accounts payable automation.

Questions people ask

Is EnKash or Payhawk better?
Neither clearly leads. EnKash starts at On request and Payhawk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EnKash or Payhawk?
EnKash starts at On request and Payhawk at On request.
Does EnKash or Payhawk run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is EnKash best used for?
EnKash is most often used for an indian business replacing branch-level petty cash handling with upi-linked digital wallets, a finance team wanting real-time merchant category restrictions on employee card spend, a company wanting tax-saving benefit cards issued alongside standard expense cards, an enterprise wanting a prepaid card issuer with its own rbi licence rather than a reseller of a bank's licence. Of those, an indian business replacing branch-level petty cash handling with upi-linked digital wallets and a finance team wanting real-time merchant category restrictions on employee card spend are not what Payhawk is typically brought in for.
What can EnKash do that Payhawk cannot?
EnKash covers Corporate card ecosystem, UPI-linked petty cash wallets, Real-time compliance controls, AI receipt management. Payhawk covers Corporate cards, Accounts payable automation, Procurement module, Travel booking.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

EnKash: Does EnKash operate outside India?

No, it is built for the Indian regulatory and payment rail environment specifically.

Payhawk: Is Payhawk pricing really public?

Yes, module pricing (Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Expenses, Procurement) is published starting at 299 to 499 dollars a month per module, or bundled as Payhawk Complete.

EnKash: What is a PPI licence and why does it matter?

It is a Reserve Bank of India licence to issue prepaid payment instruments; EnKash holding its own, obtained April 2025, means it depends less on a partner bank for card issuance.

Payhawk: Does it charge per seat?

No, each module includes unlimited employee seats; the fixed monthly fee does not increase with headcount.

EnKash: Is pricing published?

No, EnKash requires a sales conversation for pricing based on card volume and modules used.

Payhawk: Can we buy just one module?

Yes, modules are sold separately, so a company can buy Accounts Payable without Cards or Procurement.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads