Softwr

Payroll · head to head

Clair vs Payhawk

Clair logo

Clair

Payroll

On demand pay advances funded by a partner bank with no fee to the employee

From
On request
Rated
-
Payhawk logo

Payhawk

Payroll

Modular spend management combining corporate cards, accounts payable, procurement and travel

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Clair advance limits start around $100 per advance and roughly $200 between paydays, so it covers a shift level cash gap and not a genuine emergency.; Payhawk buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.
  • They diverge on capability: Clair covers Embedded enrolment, Payhawk covers Corporate cards.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Clair and Payhawk actually diverge.

Attributes where Clair and Payhawk differ
AttributeClairPayhawk
Pricing modelquotePer module per month

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Payroll).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Clair

  • Embedded enrolment
  • Bank issued advances
  • Clair spending account and card
  • Free standard delivery
  • Instant delivery option
  • Progressive limits
  • Automatic repayment
  • No interest or late fees

Only in Payhawk

  • Corporate cards
  • Accounts payable automation
  • Procurement module
  • Travel booking
  • ERP integrations
  • Multi-entity consolidation

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Clair

  • A restaurant group already on 7shifts wanting on demand pay without adding another vendor contractnot Payhawk
  • A small business on QuickBooks Payroll enabling early wage access inside its existing payroll productnot Payhawk
  • An employer that wants a fee free option to be the default rather than a paid upgradenot Payhawk
  • A shift based operator using early pay access as a shift fill incentive without changing payroll timingnot Payhawk

Payhawk

  • A multi-entity European business wanting one system for cards, expenses and payables across currenciesnot Clair
  • A finance team that wants to price spend management before a sales call rather than negotiating blindnot Clair
  • A company wanting only accounts payable automation without paying for card issuing it does not neednot Clair
  • A mid-market business standardising ERP-integrated expense reporting ahead of a fundraise or auditnot Clair

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Clair

  • Advance limits start around $100 per advance and roughly $200 between paydays, so it covers a shift level cash gap and not a genuine emergency.
  • Instant delivery to an existing bank account costs the employee $4.99, so the free path in practice means opening a Clair account and card that the employee did not previously want.
  • The business depends on interchange from the Clair spending account, which means the design nudges workers to move their pay to a new account rather than keep their existing bank.
  • Availability is tied to payroll and scheduling partners, so an employer on an unsupported payroll system cannot buy Clair directly.
  • Advances are issued by Pathward, N.A. rather than Clair, so the terms and eligibility rules for the product ultimately sit with a bank that the employer has no contract with.

Payhawk

  • Buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.
  • The unlimited-seats model is a poor fit for a company issuing cards to only a handful of employees, since the fixed module price does not scale down.
  • Card issuing depends on Payhawk's own banking partners rather than a company's existing bank, so switching away later means reissuing cards and re-training staff on a new tool.
  • Procurement is a separate paid module rather than a built-in feature, so a company evaluating "Payhawk" from marketing material may be looking at capability it has not actually bought.
  • International card acceptance and FX handling vary by market, and companies with material spend outside Europe report gaps compared to global card issuers.

Pricing, plan by plan

Clair

On request
  • Clair on demand pay$undefined/year
    • No published employer cost; delivered through payroll and scheduling partners
    • Standard one to three business day advances are free to the employee
    • Instant transfer to an external bank account costs $4.99

Payhawk

On request
  • Travel$299/month
    • Integrated travel booking
    • Unlimited employee seats
  • Accounts Payable$349/month
    • Invoice capture and approval routing
    • Unlimited document processing
  • Cards and Expenses$449/month
    • Unlimited card transactions
    • Multi-entity expense management
  • Procurement$499/month
    • Purchase request and approval workflow
    • Vendor management

Which should you pick?

Choose Clair if

  • You need embedded enrolment.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want bank issued advances.

Choose Payhawk if

  • You need corporate cards.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want accounts payable automation.

Questions people ask

Is Clair or Payhawk better?
Neither clearly leads. Clair starts at On request and Payhawk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Clair or Payhawk?
Clair starts at On request and Payhawk at On request.
Does Clair or Payhawk run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Clair best used for?
Clair is most often used for a restaurant group already on 7shifts wanting on demand pay without adding another vendor contract, a small business on quickbooks payroll enabling early wage access inside its existing payroll product, an employer that wants a fee free option to be the default rather than a paid upgrade, a shift based operator using early pay access as a shift fill incentive without changing payroll timing. Of those, a restaurant group already on 7shifts wanting on demand pay without adding another vendor contract and a small business on quickbooks payroll enabling early wage access inside its existing payroll product are not what Payhawk is typically brought in for.
What can Clair do that Payhawk cannot?
Clair covers Embedded enrolment, Bank issued advances, Clair spending account and card, Free standard delivery. Payhawk covers Corporate cards, Accounts payable automation, Procurement module, Travel booking.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Clair: Does the employee pay a fee?

Not for standard one to three business day advances, and not for instant access into the Clair spending account. Instant transfer to an outside bank account costs $4.99.

Payhawk: Is Payhawk pricing really public?

Yes, module pricing (Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Expenses, Procurement) is published starting at 299 to 499 dollars a month per module, or bundled as Payhawk Complete.

Clair: How much can an employee advance?

Up to about $100 per advance and roughly $200 between paydays to start, with limits rising after consistent repayment.

Payhawk: Does it charge per seat?

No, each module includes unlimited employee seats; the fixed monthly fee does not increase with headcount.

Clair: Can I buy Clair if I do not use a partner payroll system?

Generally no. It is distributed through payroll and scheduling platforms such as Gusto, QuickBooks Payroll and 7shifts.

Payhawk: Can we buy just one module?

Yes, modules are sold separately, so a company can buy Accounts Payable without Cards or Procurement.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads