Cloud · head to head
Packer vs Passbolt

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- They diverge on capability: Packer covers Image building, Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Packer and Passbolt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Packer
- Image building
- Multi-platform support
- Provisioners
- Builders
- Post-processors
- Variables
- Data sources
- Validation
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Packer
- Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot Passbolt
- Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot Passbolt
- Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot Packer
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot Packer
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot Packer
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot Packer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Packer
- Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
- Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Packer
Free- Open SourceFree
- Multi-platform image building
- Template-driven
- Provisioner support
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose Packer if
- You need image building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want multi-platform support.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is Packer or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Packer starts at Free and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Packer or Passbolt?
- Packer starts at Free and Passbolt at Free.
- Does Packer or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use Packer for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Packer best used for?
- Packer is most often used for building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one template, baking golden amis and vm images into a ci pipeline, creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by terraform. Of those, building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one template and baking golden amis and vm images into a ci pipeline are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can Packer do that Passbolt cannot?
- Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders. Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Packer: How much does HashiCorp Packer cost?
Packer does not publish specific pricing on its website. The open-source Packer tool is free, while HCP Packer (HashiCorp's cloud-hosted version) offers a free trial, but detailed pricing requires contacting HashiCorp.
SourcePassbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourcePassbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourcePassbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Packer vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Packer vs DigitalOcean
- Packer vs Grafana Cloud
- Packer vs Neon
- Packer vs Pulumi
- Packer vs Serverless Framework
- Packer vs Rancher
- Packer vs Puppet
- Packer vs SST
- Packer vs Buildah
- Packer vs Terragrunt
- Packer vs Portworx
- Packer vs Cilium
- Packer vs Contabo
- Packer vs Coolify
- Packer vs Crossplane
- Packer vs Dokku
- Packer vs containerd
- Packer vs Bitwarden
- Packer vs LastPass
- Packer vs authentik
- Packer vs 1Password
- Packer vs Authelia
- Packer vs Enpass
- Packer vs HashiCorp Vault
- Packer vs Infisical
- Packer vs Norton 360
- Packer vs Semgrep
- Packer vs Trivy
- Packer vs Chainguard
- Packer vs Trulioo
- Packer vs Unit21
- Packer vs Veracode
- Packer vs Very Good Security
- Packer vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Packer vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Passbolt vs DigitalOcean
- Passbolt vs Grafana Cloud
- Passbolt vs Neon
- Passbolt vs Pulumi
- Passbolt vs Serverless Framework
- Passbolt vs Rancher
- Passbolt vs Puppet
- Passbolt vs SST
- Passbolt vs Buildah
- Passbolt vs Terragrunt
- Passbolt vs Portworx
- Passbolt vs Cilium
- Passbolt vs Contabo
- Passbolt vs Coolify
- Passbolt vs Crossplane
- Passbolt vs Dokku
- Passbolt vs containerd
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe

