Cybersecurity · head to head
Passbolt vs pfSense

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

pfSense
Networking
Open source firewall software with a free Community Edition and a separate commercial Plus edition sold by Netgate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.; pfSense pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- They diverge on capability: Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Passbolt and pfSense actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
Only in pfSense
- Stateful firewall and NAT
- VPN support
- Traffic shaping and QoS
- Package ecosystem
- CE and Plus editions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot pfSense
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot pfSense
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot pfSense
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot pfSense
pfSense
- A home user or small business wanting a free, fully-featured firewall on commodity hardware with no licence costnot Passbolt
- A business wanting an integrated firewall appliance with vendor support, typically buying a Netgate appliance bundled with pfSense Plusnot Passbolt
- A team wanting to evaluate advanced features like real-time threat intelligence before committing to Netgate hardware or a Plus migrationnot Passbolt
- An organisation replacing an expensive commercial firewall with an open source alternative while retaining the option to add commercial support laternot Passbolt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
pfSense
- pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- Running Plus on non-Netgate hardware depends on Netgate's current migration terms, which have changed over time, so a buyer planning to use white-box hardware with Plus should verify current eligibility rather than assume it works as it did previously
- CE has no official vendor support channel; a business relying on it for production firewalling without a support contract is self-supporting on community forums
- Some newer features and threat intelligence integrations are Plus-only, so CE users do not get feature parity going forward even though both editions remain under active development
- Netgate's own appliance pricing and the terms of the CE-to-Plus migration path are not always clearly presented in one place, requiring some digging to understand the real total cost of a Plus deployment on non-Netgate hardware
- As with any self-managed firewall, security depends on the operator applying updates and correctly configuring rules; there is no managed security operations layer included even in Plus
Pricing, plan by plan
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
pfSense
Free- pfSense CEFree
- Full firewall and routing functionality
- No vendor lock-in to hardware
- Community support
- pfSense Plus (via Netgate appliance)$undefined/one-time
- Bundled with Netgate hardware appliances from around $189
- Threat intelligence feeds
- Certified support tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Choose pfSense if
- You need stateful firewall and nat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want vpn support.
Questions people ask
- Is Passbolt or pfSense better?
- Neither clearly leads. Passbolt starts at Free and pfSense at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Passbolt or pfSense?
- Passbolt starts at Free and pfSense at Free.
- Does Passbolt or pfSense run on more platforms?
- Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api. pfSense runs on Linux.
- Can I use Passbolt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Passbolt best used for?
- Passbolt is most often used for self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty, provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory, sharing credentials across engineering or it teams via folders and groups, automating credential retrieval through the cli or open api. Of those, self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty and provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory are not what pfSense is typically brought in for.
- What can Passbolt do that pfSense cannot?
- Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API. pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT, VPN support, Traffic shaping and QoS, Package ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourcepfSense: What is the difference between pfSense CE and pfSense Plus?
CE is the free, open source edition installable on any compatible hardware; Plus is a commercial edition from Netgate with additional features and support, typically bundled with Netgate appliances.
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourcepfSense: Can I run pfSense Plus on my own hardware?
It is possible through a migration from a CE installation via Netgate's official channel, but the terms and availability of that path have changed over time and should be confirmed directly with Netgate.
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourcepfSense: Is pfSense CE really free with no catch?
Yes, CE has no licence fee and no hardware lock-in, though it comes with community rather than vendor support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Passbolt vs OpenVPN
- Passbolt vs Cisco Meraki
- Passbolt vs Juniper Mist
- Passbolt vs LibreNMS
- Passbolt vs Icinga
- Passbolt vs OPNsense
- Passbolt vs Zabbix
- Passbolt vs Traefik
- Passbolt vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Passbolt vs Nebula
- Passbolt vs Consul
- Passbolt vs Domotz
- Passbolt vs Headscale
- Passbolt vs HiveMQ
- Passbolt vs Netdata
- Passbolt vs ThousandEyes
- pfSense vs Bitwarden
- pfSense vs LastPass
- pfSense vs authentik
- pfSense vs 1Password
- pfSense vs Authelia
- pfSense vs Enpass
- pfSense vs HashiCorp Vault
- pfSense vs Infisical
- pfSense vs Norton 360
- pfSense vs Semgrep
- pfSense vs Trivy
- pfSense vs Chainguard
- pfSense vs Trulioo
- pfSense vs Unit21
- pfSense vs Veracode
- pfSense vs Very Good Security
- pfSense vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- pfSense vs Windscribe
- pfSense vs MikroTik RouterOS
- pfSense vs OpenVPN
- pfSense vs Cisco Meraki
- pfSense vs Juniper Mist
- pfSense vs LibreNMS
- pfSense vs Icinga
- pfSense vs OPNsense
- pfSense vs Zabbix
- pfSense vs Traefik
- pfSense vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- pfSense vs Nebula
- pfSense vs Consul
- pfSense vs Domotz
- pfSense vs Headscale
- pfSense vs HiveMQ
- pfSense vs Netdata
- pfSense vs ThousandEyes
