Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

pfSense
Networking
Open source firewall software with a free Community Edition and a separate commercial Plus edition sold by Netgate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; pfSense pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and pfSense actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | pfSense |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Open source Community Edition, free; commercial Plus edition sold separately by Netgate |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in pfSense
- Stateful firewall and NAT
- VPN support
- Traffic shaping and QoS
- Package ecosystem
- CE and Plus editions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot pfSense
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot pfSense
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot pfSense
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot pfSense
pfSense
- A home user or small business wanting a free, fully-featured firewall on commodity hardware with no licence costnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- A business wanting an integrated firewall appliance with vendor support, typically buying a Netgate appliance bundled with pfSense Plusnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- A team wanting to evaluate advanced features like real-time threat intelligence before committing to Netgate hardware or a Plus migrationnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- An organisation replacing an expensive commercial firewall with an open source alternative while retaining the option to add commercial support laternot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
pfSense
- pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- Running Plus on non-Netgate hardware depends on Netgate's current migration terms, which have changed over time, so a buyer planning to use white-box hardware with Plus should verify current eligibility rather than assume it works as it did previously
- CE has no official vendor support channel; a business relying on it for production firewalling without a support contract is self-supporting on community forums
- Some newer features and threat intelligence integrations are Plus-only, so CE users do not get feature parity going forward even though both editions remain under active development
- Netgate's own appliance pricing and the terms of the CE-to-Plus migration path are not always clearly presented in one place, requiring some digging to understand the real total cost of a Plus deployment on non-Netgate hardware
- As with any self-managed firewall, security depends on the operator applying updates and correctly configuring rules; there is no managed security operations layer included even in Plus
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
pfSense
Free- pfSense CEFree
- Full firewall and routing functionality
- No vendor lock-in to hardware
- Community support
- pfSense Plus (via Netgate appliance)$undefined/one-time
- Bundled with Netgate hardware appliances from around $189
- Threat intelligence feeds
- Certified support tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose pfSense if
- You need stateful firewall and nat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want vpn support.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or pfSense better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and pfSense at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or pfSense?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and pfSense at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or pfSense run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. pfSense runs on Linux.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what pfSense is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that pfSense cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT, VPN support, Traffic shaping and QoS, Package ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
pfSense: What is the difference between pfSense CE and pfSense Plus?
CE is the free, open source edition installable on any compatible hardware; Plus is a commercial edition from Netgate with additional features and support, typically bundled with Netgate appliances.
Eclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
pfSense: Can I run pfSense Plus on my own hardware?
It is possible through a migration from a CE installation via Netgate's official channel, but the terms and availability of that path have changed over time and should be confirmed directly with Netgate.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
pfSense: Is pfSense CE really free with no catch?
Yes, CE has no licence fee and no hardware lock-in, though it comes with community rather than vendor support.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Cisco Meraki
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Juniper Mist
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OPNsense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Domotz
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Headscale
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ThousandEyes
- pfSense vs HiveMQ
- pfSense vs Traefik
- pfSense vs OpenVPN
- pfSense vs Icinga
- pfSense vs Consul
- pfSense vs LibreNMS
- pfSense vs Zabbix
- pfSense vs Nebula
- pfSense vs MikroTik RouterOS
- pfSense vs PRTG Network Monitor
- pfSense vs Netdata
- pfSense vs Catchpoint
- pfSense vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- pfSense vs Cisco Meraki
- pfSense vs Juniper Mist
- pfSense vs OPNsense
- pfSense vs Domotz
- pfSense vs Headscale
- pfSense vs ThousandEyes
