Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs pfSense

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

pfSense
Networking
Open source firewall software with a free Community Edition and a separate commercial Plus edition sold by Netgate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; pfSense pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and pfSense actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | pfSense |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Open source Community Edition, free; commercial Plus edition sold separately by Netgate |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Networking |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in pfSense
- Stateful firewall and NAT
- VPN support
- Traffic shaping and QoS
- Package ecosystem
- CE and Plus editions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot pfSense
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot pfSense
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot pfSense
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot pfSense
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot pfSense
pfSense
- A home user or small business wanting a free, fully-featured firewall on commodity hardware with no licence costnot Chainguard
- A business wanting an integrated firewall appliance with vendor support, typically buying a Netgate appliance bundled with pfSense Plusnot Chainguard
- A team wanting to evaluate advanced features like real-time threat intelligence before committing to Netgate hardware or a Plus migrationnot Chainguard
- An organisation replacing an expensive commercial firewall with an open source alternative while retaining the option to add commercial support laternot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
pfSense
- pfSense CE and pfSense Plus are not simply the same software with a support contract layered on top; Plus is a separately developed edition with its own feature set, and moving between them is a migration, not a toggle
- Running Plus on non-Netgate hardware depends on Netgate's current migration terms, which have changed over time, so a buyer planning to use white-box hardware with Plus should verify current eligibility rather than assume it works as it did previously
- CE has no official vendor support channel; a business relying on it for production firewalling without a support contract is self-supporting on community forums
- Some newer features and threat intelligence integrations are Plus-only, so CE users do not get feature parity going forward even though both editions remain under active development
- Netgate's own appliance pricing and the terms of the CE-to-Plus migration path are not always clearly presented in one place, requiring some digging to understand the real total cost of a Plus deployment on non-Netgate hardware
- As with any self-managed firewall, security depends on the operator applying updates and correctly configuring rules; there is no managed security operations layer included even in Plus
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
pfSense
Free- pfSense CEFree
- Full firewall and routing functionality
- No vendor lock-in to hardware
- Community support
- pfSense Plus (via Netgate appliance)$undefined/one-time
- Bundled with Netgate hardware appliances from around $189
- Threat intelligence feeds
- Certified support tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose pfSense if
- You need stateful firewall and nat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want vpn support.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or pfSense better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and pfSense at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or pfSense?
- Chainguard starts at Free and pfSense at Free.
- Does Chainguard or pfSense run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. pfSense runs on Linux.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what pfSense is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that pfSense cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. pfSense covers Stateful firewall and NAT, VPN support, Traffic shaping and QoS, Package ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourcepfSense: What is the difference between pfSense CE and pfSense Plus?
CE is the free, open source edition installable on any compatible hardware; Plus is a commercial edition from Netgate with additional features and support, typically bundled with Netgate appliances.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourcepfSense: Can I run pfSense Plus on my own hardware?
It is possible through a migration from a CE installation via Netgate's official channel, but the terms and availability of that path have changed over time and should be confirmed directly with Netgate.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourcepfSense: Is pfSense CE really free with no catch?
Yes, CE has no licence fee and no hardware lock-in, though it comes with community rather than vendor support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Chainguard vs OpenVPN
- Chainguard vs Cisco Meraki
- Chainguard vs Juniper Mist
- Chainguard vs LibreNMS
- Chainguard vs Icinga
- Chainguard vs OPNsense
- Chainguard vs Zabbix
- Chainguard vs Traefik
- Chainguard vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Chainguard vs Nebula
- Chainguard vs Consul
- Chainguard vs Domotz
- Chainguard vs Headscale
- Chainguard vs HiveMQ
- Chainguard vs Netdata
- Chainguard vs ThousandEyes
- pfSense vs Snyk
- pfSense vs Trivy
- pfSense vs Doppler
- pfSense vs Infisical
- pfSense vs Grype
- pfSense vs Arnica
- pfSense vs HashiCorp Vault
- pfSense vs Bitwarden
- pfSense vs Semgrep
- pfSense vs Authelia
- pfSense vs Endor Labs
- pfSense vs Tenable
- pfSense vs Hanwha Vision
- pfSense vs Idira
- pfSense vs IVPN
- pfSense vs Logto
- pfSense vs Malwarebytes
- pfSense vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- pfSense vs MikroTik RouterOS
- pfSense vs OpenVPN
- pfSense vs Cisco Meraki
- pfSense vs Juniper Mist
- pfSense vs LibreNMS
- pfSense vs Icinga
- pfSense vs OPNsense
- pfSense vs Zabbix
- pfSense vs Traefik
- pfSense vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- pfSense vs Nebula
- pfSense vs Consul
- pfSense vs Domotz
- pfSense vs Headscale
- pfSense vs HiveMQ
- pfSense vs Netdata
- pfSense vs ThousandEyes
