Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs Surfshark
OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; Surfshark smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Surfshark covers Unlimited devices.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and Surfshark actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in Surfshark
- Unlimited devices
- CleanWeb ad blocker
- MultiHop
- Camouflage Mode
- NoBorders mode
- Kill Switch
- Bypasser split tunneling
- Rotating IP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Surfshark
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Surfshark
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Surfshark
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Surfshark
Surfshark
- Vpnnot OWASP ZAP
- Privacynot OWASP ZAP
- Security Suitenot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Surfshark
- Smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- Lower brand recognition compared to established VPN providers
- Limited customer service availability in some time zones
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Surfshark
$1.78/month- Starter$1.78/month
- Unlimited simultaneous connections
- 4,500+ servers
- Basic VPN
- One$3.59/month
- VPN
- Antivirus
- Personal data leak alert
- One+$4/month
- All One features
- Incogi included
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose Surfshark if
- You need unlimited devices.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want cleanweb ad blocker.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or Surfshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and Surfshark at $1.78/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or Surfshark?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and $1.78/month for Surfshark.
- Does OWASP ZAP or Surfshark run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. Surfshark runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Surfshark starts at $1.78/month.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what Surfshark is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that Surfshark cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. Surfshark covers Unlimited devices, CleanWeb ad blocker, MultiHop, Camouflage Mode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Surfshark: Does Surfshark maintain a no-logs policy?
Yes. Surfshark does not log browsing history, visited IP addresses, bandwidth usage, or network traffic. This policy was independently verified by Deloitte in 2025.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Surfshark: How many simultaneous device connections does Surfshark allow?
Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections on all subscription plans, enabling protection of every device in a household with a single subscription.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs CyberGhost VPN
- OWASP ZAP vs ProtonVPN
- OWASP ZAP vs NordVPN
- OWASP ZAP vs Avast One
- OWASP ZAP vs IVPN
- OWASP ZAP vs Mullvad VPN
- OWASP ZAP vs Windscribe
- OWASP ZAP vs TunnelBear
- OWASP ZAP vs Private Internet Access
- OWASP ZAP vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- OWASP ZAP vs iDenfy
- OWASP ZAP vs IDnow
- OWASP ZAP vs Jumio
- OWASP ZAP vs Kaspersky Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs LogicManager
- OWASP ZAP vs ExpressVPN
- Surfshark vs 1Password
- Surfshark vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Surfshark vs Norton 360
- Surfshark vs LastPass
- Surfshark vs Bitwarden
- Surfshark vs Burp Suite
- Surfshark vs Metasploit
- Surfshark vs Wireshark
- Surfshark vs authentik
- Surfshark vs Authelia
- Surfshark vs Infisical
- Surfshark vs Trivy
- Surfshark vs Feedzai
- Surfshark vs Frontegg
- Surfshark vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Surfshark vs JumpCloud
- Surfshark vs McAfee Total Protection
- Surfshark vs CyberGhost VPN
- Surfshark vs ProtonVPN
- Surfshark vs NordVPN
- Surfshark vs Avast One
- Surfshark vs IVPN
- Surfshark vs Mullvad VPN
- Surfshark vs Windscribe
- Surfshark vs TunnelBear
- Surfshark vs Private Internet Access
- Surfshark vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Surfshark vs iDenfy
- Surfshark vs IDnow
- Surfshark vs Jumio
- Surfshark vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Surfshark vs LogicManager
- Surfshark vs ExpressVPN