Insurance · head to head
Origami Risk vs VMware Carbon Black
VMware Carbon Black
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered endpoint protection and EDR, now owned by Broadcom and positioned alongside Symantec.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Origami Risk pricing not published; requires quote request; VMware Carbon Black broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- They diverge on capability: Origami Risk covers Claims administration, VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Origami Risk and VMware Carbon Black actually diverge.
| Attribute | Origami Risk | VMware Carbon Black |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Desktop, Api |
| Category | Insurance | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2009 | 2002 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Origami Risk
- Claims administration
- Policy management
- Risk analytics
- Incident management
- Safety compliance
- Certificate tracking
- Vendor management
- Custom workflows
Only in VMware Carbon Black
- Endpoint Standard
- Enterprise EDR
- Audit and Remediation
- Single sensor
- Live Response
- Workload protection
- Container security
- Watchlists and feeds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Origami Risk
- Claims administrationnot VMware Carbon Black
- Risk managementnot VMware Carbon Black
- Safety compliancenot VMware Carbon Black
- Insurance trackingnot VMware Carbon Black
- Analytics & reportingnot VMware Carbon Black
VMware Carbon Black
- A SOC that wants unfiltered endpoint telemetry to hunt over rather than only vendor-generated alertsnot Origami Risk
- A vSphere estate that wants workload protection deployed through the hypervisor instead of installing an agent in every guestnot Origami Risk
- Replacing signature antivirus after an incident where the incumbent product had no record of what the attacker didnot Origami Risk
- An organisation already inside a Broadcom or Symantec enterprise agreement that can consolidate endpoint onto an existing contractnot Origami Risk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Origami Risk
- Pricing not published; requires quote request
VMware Carbon Black
- Broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- Continuous EDR recording is retained for a defined window and longer retention is a paid tier, so the investigation you most need is often the one whose telemetry has already aged out, and that is discovered during the incident rather than before it.
- The product assumes an operator: watchlists, policy tuning and alert triage are ongoing work, and organisations without a dedicated analyst or an MDR contract typically leave policies in monitor mode and pay for telemetry that is never reviewed.
- The sensor operates in the same kernel and file-filter territory as other endpoint agents, so running it alongside an incumbent antivirus, DLP or backup agent commonly produces performance complaints and requires maintained exclusion lists on both sides.
- Linux sensor support is tied to specific distribution and kernel versions, so a routine operating system upgrade can leave hosts without a supported sensor until a matching build ships, and anything outside the supported list gets no coverage at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Origami Risk
On request- Core Platform$undefined/year
- Claims management
- Policy tracking
- Incident reporting
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- All Core features
- Advanced analytics
- Safety management
VMware Carbon Black
On request- CB Endpoint StandardFree
- NGAV
- Behavioral EDR
- Device control
- CB Endpoint AdvancedFree
- All Standard features
- Threat hunting
- Audit and remediation
- CB Endpoint EnterpriseFree
- All Advanced features
- Advanced threat hunting
- Live response
Which should you pick?
Choose Origami Risk if
- You need claims administration.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want policy management.
Choose VMware Carbon Black if
- You need endpoint standard.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want enterprise edr.
Questions people ask
- Is Origami Risk or VMware Carbon Black better?
- Neither clearly leads. Origami Risk starts at On request and VMware Carbon Black at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Origami Risk or VMware Carbon Black?
- Origami Risk starts at On request and VMware Carbon Black at On request.
- Does Origami Risk or VMware Carbon Black run on more platforms?
- Origami Risk runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. VMware Carbon Black runs on Desktop, Api.
- What is Origami Risk best used for?
- Origami Risk is most often used for claims administration, risk management, safety compliance, insurance tracking. Of those, claims administration and risk management are not what VMware Carbon Black is typically brought in for.
- What can Origami Risk do that VMware Carbon Black cannot?
- Origami Risk covers Claims administration, Policy management, Risk analytics, Incident management. VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard, Enterprise EDR, Audit and Remediation, Single sensor.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Origami Risk: How is Origami Risk priced?
Origami Risk does not publish pricing on its website. Pricing is customized based on organization size, specific modules needed, and implementation scope. Contact sales to request a demo and pricing quote.
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Who owns Carbon Black now?
Broadcom. It acquired VMware in November 2023, and Carbon Black now sits in Broadcom's enterprise security business alongside Symantec. VMware branding is being phased out.
VMware Carbon Black: Why do the docs use names I do not recognise?
The product has been renamed repeatedly. CB Defense is now Endpoint Standard, CB ThreatHunter is Enterprise EDR and CB LiveOps is Audit and Remediation. Older community answers and runbooks still use the previous names.
VMware Carbon Black: Does it replace my existing antivirus?
Yes on supported Windows, macOS and Linux versions, and running it alongside another antivirus is not recommended because the two agents contend for the same hooks. Check your compliance requirements, as some auditors still ask for a named antivirus product.
VMware Carbon Black: Do I need a full-time analyst to run it?
To get value from Enterprise EDR, effectively yes. The prevention tier can run with part-time attention, but the hunting and recording capability is only worth its cost if somebody is querying it, which is why many customers buy it through an MDR provider.
VMware Carbon Black: How is it licensed?
Per endpoint, per year, with the capability tier determining the rate and workload and container protection priced separately. Extended EDR data retention is an additional line item.
Related pages
More on Origami Risk
More on VMware Carbon Black
Other head to heads
- Origami Risk vs Duck Creek
- Origami Risk vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Origami Risk vs Duck Creek Policy
- Origami Risk vs Five Sigma
- Origami Risk vs Verisk
- Origami Risk vs Shift Technology
- Origami Risk vs Insurity Suite
- Origami Risk vs FRISS
- Origami Risk vs Tarmika
- Origami Risk vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Origami Risk vs Embroker
- Origami Risk vs FINEOS
- Origami Risk vs Haven Life
- Origami Risk vs Hippo
- Origami Risk vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Origami Risk vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Origami Risk vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Origami Risk vs Norton 360
- Origami Risk vs 1Password
- Origami Risk vs LastPass
- Origami Risk vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Origami Risk vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Origami Risk vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Origami Risk vs SentinelOne
- Origami Risk vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Origami Risk vs Proofpoint
- Origami Risk vs Sophos Intercept X
- Origami Risk vs Descope
- Origami Risk vs Drata
- Origami Risk vs DTiQ
- Origami Risk vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Origami Risk vs ExpressVPN
- Origami Risk vs Falco
- Origami Risk vs SentinelOne Singularity
- VMware Carbon Black vs Duck Creek
- VMware Carbon Black vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- VMware Carbon Black vs Duck Creek Policy
- VMware Carbon Black vs Five Sigma
- VMware Carbon Black vs Verisk
- VMware Carbon Black vs Shift Technology
- VMware Carbon Black vs Insurity Suite
- VMware Carbon Black vs FRISS
- VMware Carbon Black vs Tarmika
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- VMware Carbon Black vs Embroker
- VMware Carbon Black vs FINEOS
- VMware Carbon Black vs Haven Life
- VMware Carbon Black vs Hippo
- VMware Carbon Black vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- VMware Carbon Black vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bitdefender Total Security
- VMware Carbon Black vs Norton 360
- VMware Carbon Black vs 1Password
- VMware Carbon Black vs LastPass
- VMware Carbon Black vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- VMware Carbon Black vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne
- VMware Carbon Black vs Trend Micro Vision One
- VMware Carbon Black vs Proofpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sophos Intercept X
- VMware Carbon Black vs Descope
- VMware Carbon Black vs Drata
- VMware Carbon Black vs DTiQ
- VMware Carbon Black vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- VMware Carbon Black vs ExpressVPN
- VMware Carbon Black vs Falco
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne Singularity

