Manufacturing · head to head
IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oqton

IBM Maximo Application Suite
Manufacturing
Enterprise asset management suite licensed by a shared pool of AppPoints rather than by named user
- From
- $3150/month
- Rated
- -

Oqton
Manufacturing
3D Systems manufacturing operating system for additive, narrowed after Geomagic was sold to Hexagon
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM Maximo Application Suite appPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.; Oqton 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- They diverge on capability: IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling, Oqton covers Manufacturing OS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM Maximo Application Suite and Oqton actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM Maximo Application Suite | Oqton |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3150/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per year by AppPoint pool | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux | Web, Windows, API |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoint pooling
- Maximo Manage
- Maximo Health and Predict
- Maximo Visual Inspection
- Industry solutions
- OpenShift deployment
Only in Oqton
- Manufacturing OS
- Build preparation
- Machine connectivity
- Traceability
- Automated nesting
- Quality data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market CMMS cannot producenot Oqton
- An airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back yearsnot Oqton
- A manufacturer wanting condition-based maintenance and work order execution in the same system rather than integrating a predictive tool to a separate CMMSnot Oqton
- A defence or nuclear estate where the industry solution and long-term vendor viability matter more than the licence costnot Oqton
Oqton
- A metal additive production site scheduling builds across several machines rather than per operatornot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A dental manufacturer needing batch to part traceability for regulated devicesnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A 3D Systems printer customer moving from prototyping to serial productionnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A factory automating build nesting to raise platform utilisationnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- Pools are commonly sized from headcount rather than concurrency and application mix, and licence reviews frequently find them over-provisioned by a large margin, meaning organisations pay for entitlement they never consume.
- Implementation, data migration, customisation and integrator fees routinely cost two to three times the first-year licence, so a business case built on the subscription figure will be materially wrong.
- MAS requires Red Hat OpenShift, which for a customer-hosted deployment adds a container platform, its licensing and the specialist administration skills to run it, none of which the previous standalone Maximo needed.
- Maximo is deep and slow to change; configuration is a specialist skill, upgrades are projects rather than updates, and organisations without a dedicated Maximo team end up permanently dependent on an implementation partner.
Oqton
- 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- No pricing is published, and licensing is split between the manufacturing OS and separately licensed build preparation modules, so the quoted figure is rarely the full cost.
- Support is deepest on 3D Systems hardware despite multi-vendor claims, so a mixed fleet gets uneven data capture and control.
- The parent company has been under financial pressure and has already divested a major software line, which is a genuine continuity risk for a system running a production floor.
- It is additive-only, so a manufacturer with mixed processes needs a conventional MES alongside it and an integration between the two.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM Maximo Application Suite
$3150/month- Essentials (SaaS)$3150/month
- Entry SaaS tier for a small user population
- One production environment
- Core Manage functionality
- Standard (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Larger AppPoint pool
- Additional applications and environments
- Priced on application
- Premium (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Full application set including Predict and Visual Inspection
- Multiple environments
- Priced on application
- Customer hosted$undefined/year
- AppPoint entitlement bought outright and run on your own OpenShift cluster
- Infrastructure, OpenShift and administration costs are yours
- Annual support and subscription contract required
Oqton
On request- Oqton Industrial Manufacturing OS$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted by 3D Systems
- Priced on connected machines and sites
- Build preparation modules licensed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM Maximo Application Suite if
- You need apppoint pooling.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want maximo manage.
Choose Oqton if
- You need manufacturing os.
- You work on Web, Windows, API.
- You also want build preparation.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM Maximo Application Suite or Oqton better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM Maximo Application Suite starts at $3150/month and Oqton at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM Maximo Application Suite or Oqton?
- IBM Maximo Application Suite starts at $3150/month and Oqton at On request.
- Does IBM Maximo Application Suite or Oqton run on more platforms?
- IBM Maximo Application Suite runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux. Oqton runs on Web, Windows, API.
- What is IBM Maximo Application Suite best used for?
- IBM Maximo Application Suite is most often used for a transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market cmms cannot produce, an airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back years, a manufacturer wanting condition-based maintenance and work order execution in the same system rather than integrating a predictive tool to a separate cmms, a defence or nuclear estate where the industry solution and long-term vendor viability matter more than the licence cost. Of those, a transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market cmms cannot produce and an airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back years are not what Oqton is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM Maximo Application Suite do that Oqton cannot?
- IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling, Maximo Manage, Maximo Health and Predict, Maximo Visual Inspection. Oqton covers Manufacturing OS, Build preparation, Machine connectivity, Traceability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Is Maximo still sold per user?
No. The Maximo Application Suite licenses a shared AppPoint pool consumed by users, applications and environments. Per-seat Maximo is the old model.
Oqton: Who owns Oqton?
3D Systems, which acquired it in 2021 and made it the central software brand.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: What does the entry SaaS tier cost?
The Essentials package starts around $3,150 per month for a small user population and one production environment. Larger tiers are quoted.
Oqton: Did Oqton include Geomagic?
It did. 3D Systems completed the sale of the Geomagic portfolio, including Design X, Control X, Freeform and Wrap, to Hexagon for $123 million in April 2025. Oqton retained 3D Sprint, 3DXpert and the Manufacturing OS.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Do non-production environments cost AppPoints?
Yes. Development, test and training environments draw from the same pool, which is the most common sizing surprise.
Oqton: Does Oqton work with printers from other manufacturers?
It connects to multi-vendor equipment, but the deepest integration and support is on 3D Systems machines.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Can I run MAS without OpenShift?
No. OpenShift is the deployment platform whether you host it yourself or consume MAS as a service from IBM.
Oqton: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted annually, typically on connected machines and sites, with build preparation modules licensed separately.
Related pages
More on IBM Maximo Application Suite
Other head to heads
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs eMaint
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Maintenance Connection
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Hippo CMMS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Sight Machine
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Aras Innovator
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SolidWorks
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs COPA-DATA zenon
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs OpenBOM
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Ignition
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SKF Enlight Centre
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Markforged Eiger
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Materialise Magics
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs MOVUS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oden Technologies
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Fulcrum
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Tulip
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs MachineMetrics
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Autodesk Netfabb
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Authentise
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs GrabCAD Print
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Simplify3D
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs 3YOURMIND
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Formlabs PreForm
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Duro PLM
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Dyndrite
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Erbessd Instruments
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Fictiv
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Flow Software
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Prodsmart
- Oqton vs eMaint
- Oqton vs Maintenance Connection
- Oqton vs Hippo CMMS
- Oqton vs Sight Machine
- Oqton vs Aras Innovator
- Oqton vs SolidWorks
- Oqton vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Oqton vs OpenBOM
- Oqton vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Oqton vs Ignition
- Oqton vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Oqton vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Oqton vs Markforged Eiger
- Oqton vs Materialise Magics
- Oqton vs MOVUS
- Oqton vs Oden Technologies
- Oqton vs Fulcrum
- Oqton vs Tulip
- Oqton vs MachineMetrics
- Oqton vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Oqton vs Authentise
- Oqton vs GrabCAD Print
- Oqton vs Simplify3D
- Oqton vs 3YOURMIND
- Oqton vs Formlabs PreForm
- Oqton vs Duro PLM
- Oqton vs Dyndrite
- Oqton vs Erbessd Instruments
- Oqton vs Fictiv
- Oqton vs Flow Software
- Oqton vs Prodsmart
