Manufacturing · head to head
COPA-DATA zenon vs Oqton

COPA-DATA zenon
Manufacturing
HMI, SCADA and energy automation platform licensed by I/O tag count
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Oqton
Manufacturing
3D Systems manufacturing operating system for additive, narrowed after Geomagic was sold to Hexagon
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: COPA-DATA zenon the I/O count that determines your licence band is a weighted calculation, not a variable tally, so projects sized from a tag list routinely land in a higher and more expensive band than budgeted.; Oqton 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- They diverge on capability: COPA-DATA zenon covers I/O-banded licensing, Oqton covers Manufacturing OS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which COPA-DATA zenon and Oqton actually diverge.
| Attribute | COPA-DATA zenon | Oqton |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | Web, Windows, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in COPA-DATA zenon
- I/O-banded licensing
- IEC 61850 native
- zenon Logic
- Pharmaceutical compliance
- Multi-project engineering
- Redundancy
Only in Oqton
- Manufacturing OS
- Build preparation
- Machine connectivity
- Traceability
- Automated nesting
- Quality data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
COPA-DATA zenon
- A pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the SCADA layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic HMInot Oqton
- A utility automating substations that wants IEC 61850 SCL import and DNP3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver optionsnot Oqton
- A machine builder shipping identical HMI applications to many customers who wants one engineering project reused across machine and line levelnot Oqton
- A food and beverage site in German-speaking Europe where local integrator availability for zenon is strong and Rockwell coverage is notnot Oqton
Oqton
- A metal additive production site scheduling builds across several machines rather than per operatornot COPA-DATA zenon
- A dental manufacturer needing batch to part traceability for regulated devicesnot COPA-DATA zenon
- A 3D Systems printer customer moving from prototyping to serial productionnot COPA-DATA zenon
- A factory automating build nesting to raise platform utilisationnot COPA-DATA zenon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
COPA-DATA zenon
- The I/O count that determines your licence band is a weighted calculation, not a variable tally, so projects sized from a tag list routinely land in a higher and more expensive band than budgeted.
- The integrator and engineering talent pool is concentrated in German-speaking Europe; a North American or Asian site can find itself dependent on a single partner with no competitive quote available.
- English-language documentation and community material lag the German equivalents, which slows engineers who are learning the product without formal COPA-DATA training.
- The annual software maintenance contract is a percentage of licence value, so a large I/O estate carries a recurring cost that does not fall even when the plant is stable and nothing is changing.
- Third-party ecosystem extensions are far fewer than for Ignition or FactoryTalk, so requirements outside the box tend to become custom engineering billed at partner day rates.
Oqton
- 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- No pricing is published, and licensing is split between the manufacturing OS and separately licensed build preparation modules, so the quoted figure is rarely the full cost.
- Support is deepest on 3D Systems hardware despite multi-vendor claims, so a mixed fleet gets uneven data capture and control.
- The parent company has been under financial pressure and has already divested a major software line, which is a genuine continuity risk for a system running a production floor.
- It is additive-only, so a manufacturer with mixed processes needs a conventional MES alongside it and an integration between the two.
Pricing, plan by plan
COPA-DATA zenon
On request- zenon$undefined/year
- Runtime licensed in bands by calculated I/O count
- Numeric variables weighted upward in the I/O calculation, binary counted singly
- Engineering Studio licensed separately from runtime
Oqton
On request- Oqton Industrial Manufacturing OS$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted by 3D Systems
- Priced on connected machines and sites
- Build preparation modules licensed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose COPA-DATA zenon if
- You need i/o-banded licensing.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want iec 61850 native.
Choose Oqton if
- You need manufacturing os.
- You work on Web, Windows, API.
- You also want build preparation.
Questions people ask
- Is COPA-DATA zenon or Oqton better?
- Neither clearly leads. COPA-DATA zenon starts at On request and Oqton at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, COPA-DATA zenon or Oqton?
- COPA-DATA zenon starts at On request and Oqton at On request.
- Does COPA-DATA zenon or Oqton run on more platforms?
- COPA-DATA zenon runs on Windows, Linux, Web. Oqton runs on Web, Windows, API.
- What is COPA-DATA zenon best used for?
- COPA-DATA zenon is most often used for a pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the scada layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic hmi, a utility automating substations that wants iec 61850 scl import and dnp3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver options, a machine builder shipping identical hmi applications to many customers who wants one engineering project reused across machine and line level, a food and beverage site in german-speaking europe where local integrator availability for zenon is strong and rockwell coverage is not. Of those, a pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the scada layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic hmi and a utility automating substations that wants iec 61850 scl import and dnp3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver options are not what Oqton is typically brought in for.
- What can COPA-DATA zenon do that Oqton cannot?
- COPA-DATA zenon covers I/O-banded licensing, IEC 61850 native, zenon Logic, Pharmaceutical compliance. Oqton covers Manufacturing OS, Build preparation, Machine connectivity, Traceability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
COPA-DATA zenon: How is a zenon licence sized?
By calculated I/O count. Numeric variables are weighted upward in that calculation and binary values counted singly, so ask your partner for the calculated figure, not the variable count, before signing.
Oqton: Who owns Oqton?
3D Systems, which acquired it in 2021 and made it the central software brand.
COPA-DATA zenon: Is zenon only for factories?
No. A significant part of its installed base is electrical substation automation, where IEC 61850 support is native rather than an add-on.
Oqton: Did Oqton include Geomagic?
It did. 3D Systems completed the sale of the Geomagic portfolio, including Design X, Control X, Freeform and Wrap, to Hexagon for $123 million in April 2025. Oqton retained 3D Sprint, 3DXpert and the Manufacturing OS.
COPA-DATA zenon: Is there a free version?
There is a demo mode for evaluation and a free educational licence, but production runtime always needs a paid, I/O-banded licence.
Oqton: Does Oqton work with printers from other manufacturers?
It connects to multi-vendor equipment, but the deepest integration and support is on 3D Systems machines.
COPA-DATA zenon: Can zenon replace a PLC?
zenon Logic is an IEC 61131-3 soft PLC and can control non-safety-critical processes, but most deployments keep a hardware PLC and use zenon for visualisation and supervision.
Oqton: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted annually, typically on connected machines and sites, with build preparation modules licensed separately.
Related pages
More on COPA-DATA zenon
Other head to heads
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Ignition
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- COPA-DATA zenon vs AVEVA System Platform
- COPA-DATA zenon vs GENESIS Version 11
- COPA-DATA zenon vs ABB 800xA
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Flow Software
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Materialise Magics
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Propel
- COPA-DATA zenon vs SolidWorks
- COPA-DATA zenon vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- COPA-DATA zenon vs SKF Enlight Centre
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Hippo CMMS
- COPA-DATA zenon vs 3YOURMIND
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Fulcrum
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Tulip
- COPA-DATA zenon vs MachineMetrics
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Autodesk Netfabb
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Authentise
- COPA-DATA zenon vs GrabCAD Print
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Simplify3D
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Formlabs PreForm
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Markforged Eiger
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Duro PLM
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Dyndrite
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Erbessd Instruments
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Fictiv
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Prodsmart
- Oqton vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Oqton vs Ignition
- Oqton vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Oqton vs AVEVA System Platform
- Oqton vs GENESIS Version 11
- Oqton vs ABB 800xA
- Oqton vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Oqton vs Flow Software
- Oqton vs Materialise Magics
- Oqton vs Propel
- Oqton vs SolidWorks
- Oqton vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Oqton vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Oqton vs Hippo CMMS
- Oqton vs 3YOURMIND
- Oqton vs Fulcrum
- Oqton vs Tulip
- Oqton vs MachineMetrics
- Oqton vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Oqton vs Authentise
- Oqton vs GrabCAD Print
- Oqton vs Simplify3D
- Oqton vs Formlabs PreForm
- Oqton vs Markforged Eiger
- Oqton vs Duro PLM
- Oqton vs Dyndrite
- Oqton vs Erbessd Instruments
- Oqton vs Fictiv
- Oqton vs Prodsmart
