Research · head to head
Castor EDC vs OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences

Castor EDC
Research
Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
Research
Computational chemistry toolkits and the Orion cloud platform, now inside Cadence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Castor EDC nothing is published: pricing is quoted only after a scoping call and protocol review, so budgeting a grant application means asking for a quote months before the study is funded and hoping the scope holds.; OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences the free Public Domain Research Licence requires surrendering intellectual property rights and publishing results into the public domain, which rules it out for any academic group with a technology transfer office or patent ambitions.
- They diverge on capability: Castor EDC covers Browser-based study build, OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences covers OMEGA.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Castor EDC and OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences actually diverge.
| Attribute | Castor EDC | OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Linux, Windows, macOS, Web, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Castor EDC
- Browser-based study build
- 21 CFR Part 11 workflows
- eConsent
- ePRO and surveys
- Randomisation
- Per-study licensing
- Grant-funded pricing paths
- Data export
Only in OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- OMEGA
- ROCS
- ROCS X
- Orion platform
- Programmatic toolkits
- Academic routes
- Structure preparation
- Docking and scoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Castor EDC
- An academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade EDC contract or a data management CROnot OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- A medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with Part 11 audit trailsnot OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- A multi-site registry that needs remote eConsent because participants are recruited nationally rather than at a clinicnot OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- A biotech running a small phase two study that wants the database built by its own clinical team in weeks rather than commissionednot OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- A pharmaceutical discovery team screening a multi-billion compound library by three-dimensional shape rather than by two-dimensional similaritynot Castor EDC
- A computational chemist embedding conformer generation into an internal pipeline through the Python toolkitsnot Castor EDC
- A university group publishing openly that can accept the public domain licence terms in exchange for zero costnot Castor EDC
- A biotech scaling virtual screening on cloud compute without building its own clusternot Castor EDC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Castor EDC
- Nothing is published: pricing is quoted only after a scoping call and protocol review, so budgeting a grant application means asking for a quote months before the study is funded and hoping the scope holds.
- Price scales on protocol complexity rather than a simple unit, so two studies with the same participant count can be quoted very differently and there is no public benchmark to argue against.
- Modules such as eConsent, ePRO and randomisation are quoted on top of the base platform, so the headline EDC figure is rarely the number that appears on the final proposal.
- It is deliberately lighter than the full sponsor suites, so a study that grows into a global registrational programme needing integrated CTMS, safety, IRT and full trial supply management will need additional systems and the interfaces between them.
- Regulatory responsibility does not transfer with the software: the platform supports Part 11 compliant workflows, but system validation for your intended use, SOPs and audit readiness remain your obligation and your cost, which sponsors new to EDC consistently underestimate.
OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- The free Public Domain Research Licence requires surrendering intellectual property rights and publishing results into the public domain, which rules it out for any academic group with a technology transfer office or patent ambitions.
- Free academic licences are renewable but re-evaluated annually with no guarantee of continuation, so a multi-year research programme has no assured software entitlement beyond the current year.
- OpenEye now sits inside Cadence Design Systems, whose core business is chip design, so the roadmap and licensing culture are set by a company for which molecular sciences is one growth line among several.
- Commercial pricing is entirely unpublished and structured as annual subscriptions with separate Orion compute, making total cost of a screening programme hard to forecast before contracting.
- The toolkits assume real computational chemistry expertise; they are libraries and applications for specialists, not an interface a medicinal chemist can drive without training.
Pricing, plan by plan
Castor EDC
On request- Castor EDC$undefined/year
- Priced per study on protocol complexity, duration, sites and modules
- 21 CFR Part 11 and ICH GCP workflows
- eConsent, ePRO and randomisation modules quoted separately
OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
On request- Commercial licence$undefined/year
- Annual subscription priced through Cadence sales
- Toolkits and applications licensed separately from the Orion platform
- Orion compute billed on top of software entitlements
- Academic Package$undefined/year
- Paid annual subscription for university groups under ten members
- Includes support
- Researchers retain intellectual property rights
- Public Domain Research LicenceFree
- No cost
- No support of any kind
- No intellectual property rights retained
Which should you pick?
Choose Castor EDC if
- You need browser-based study build.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want 21 cfr part 11 workflows.
Choose OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences if
- You need omega.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Web, API.
- You also want rocs.
Questions people ask
- Is Castor EDC or OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences better?
- Neither clearly leads. Castor EDC starts at On request and OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Castor EDC or OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences?
- Castor EDC starts at On request and OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences at On request.
- Does Castor EDC or OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences run on more platforms?
- Castor EDC runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Web, API.
- What is Castor EDC best used for?
- Castor EDC is most often used for an academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade edc contract or a data management cro, a medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with part 11 audit trails, a multi-site registry that needs remote econsent because participants are recruited nationally rather than at a clinic, a biotech running a small phase two study that wants the database built by its own clinical team in weeks rather than commissioned. Of those, an academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade edc contract or a data management cro and a medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with part 11 audit trails are not what OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences is typically brought in for.
- What can Castor EDC do that OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences cannot?
- Castor EDC covers Browser-based study build, 21 CFR Part 11 workflows, eConsent, ePRO and surveys. OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences covers OMEGA, ROCS, ROCS X, Orion platform.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Castor EDC: Is there a free academic version?
No published free tier. There are academic, non-profit and grant-funded pricing paths, but each is quoted rather than self-service.
OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences: Is OpenEye still OpenEye?
It trades as OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences, and is part of Cadence Design Systems following acquisition. The product names OMEGA, ROCS and Orion continue.
Castor EDC: Is it 21 CFR Part 11 compliant?
It supports Part 11 compliant workflows with audit trails and electronic signatures. Validating the system for your specific use remains your responsibility.
OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences: Can academics use it for free?
Yes, through the Public Domain Research Licence or a Teaching Licence, but both come with no support and no intellectual property rights. Keeping IP rights and support requires the paid Academic Package.
Castor EDC: Do I need a programmer to build a study?
No. Case report forms are configured in the browser, which is the main reason academic groups adopt it.
OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences: What is ROCS X?
A machine learning enabled extension of ROCS shape search, built on the Orion platform, aimed at screening chemical spaces in the trillions of molecules.
Castor EDC: How long does a quote take?
Castor states a full pricing proposal within five business days of sharing the protocol.
OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences: Is commercial pricing published?
No. Commercial licences are annual subscriptions quoted through Cadence sales, with Orion compute charged separately.
Related pages
More on OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
Other head to heads
- Castor EDC vs Benchling
- Castor EDC vs LabVantage
- Castor EDC vs Sapio Sciences
- Castor EDC vs Medidata Rave
- Castor EDC vs REDCap
- Castor EDC vs Greenphire
- Castor EDC vs Florence eBinders
- Castor EDC vs Genedata
- Castor EDC vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Castor EDC vs LabArchives
- Castor EDC vs Aurelius
- Castor EDC vs Reduct
- Castor EDC vs Paperpile
- Castor EDC vs Remesh
- Castor EDC vs Schrodinger
- Castor EDC vs Chemaxon
- Castor EDC vs Dotmatics
- Castor EDC vs Form Bio
- Castor EDC vs Seven Bridges
- Castor EDC vs Valispace
- Castor EDC vs GWI
- Castor EDC vs Labguru
- Castor EDC vs Scispot
- Castor EDC vs Suzy
- Castor EDC vs Terra
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Benchling
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs LabVantage
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Sapio Sciences
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Medidata Rave
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs REDCap
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Greenphire
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Florence eBinders
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Genedata
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Wolfram Mathematica
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs LabArchives
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Aurelius
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Reduct
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Paperpile
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Remesh
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Schrodinger
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Chemaxon
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Dotmatics
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Form Bio
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Seven Bridges
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Valispace
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs GWI
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Labguru
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Scispot
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Suzy
- OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences vs Terra
