Manufacturing · head to head
OpenBOM vs QAD Adaptive ERP

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QAD Adaptive ERP
ERP
ERP for regulated and supply-chain-heavy manufacturers, strongest in automotive and life sciences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.; QAD Adaptive ERP no pricing is published and licensing splits across user types and separately sold modules, so first quotes routinely come in well above the number buyers had in their heads.
- They diverge on capability: OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, QAD Adaptive ERP covers Automotive EDI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenBOM and QAD Adaptive ERP actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenBOM | QAD Adaptive ERP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, API | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Category | Manufacturing | ERP |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Only in QAD Adaptive ERP
- Automotive EDI
- Manufacturing execution
- Supply chain planning
- Quality management
- Global financials
- Traceability and recall
- Connected workforce
- Adaptive UX
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot QAD Adaptive ERP
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot QAD Adaptive ERP
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot QAD Adaptive ERP
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot QAD Adaptive ERP
QAD Adaptive ERP
- An automotive tier supplier that must accept OEM EDI releases and ship to AIAG or Odette labelling without building it themselvesnot OpenBOM
- A multi-plant manufacturer consolidating several plant-level ERPs onto one ledger with local statutory reporting per countrynot OpenBOM
- A food or pharmaceutical maker that needs lot genealogy fast enough to scope a recall in hoursnot OpenBOM
- A manufacturer replacing an ageing QAD MFG/PRO installation and wanting continuity of process rather than a rewritenot OpenBOM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
QAD Adaptive ERP
- No pricing is published and licensing splits across user types and separately sold modules, so first quotes routinely come in well above the number buyers had in their heads.
- QAD has been owned by Thoma Bravo since the 2021 take-private, so roadmap and pricing decisions answer to an investment thesis rather than to public product commitments, and buyers should ask about contract terms at renewal.
- The implementation partner network is small next to SAP, Oracle or Microsoft, which limits competitive tendering on services and makes regional coverage patchy.
- Outside its target industries the vertical depth is dead weight, and a general distributor or services firm pays for automotive and life sciences function it will never switch on.
- Long-standing QAD customers still run heavily customised MFG/PRO estates, and migrating those customisations to Adaptive ERP is a re-implementation, not an upgrade, which is why some sites have stayed on old versions for years.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
QAD Adaptive ERP
On request- QAD Adaptive ERP$undefined/year
- Subscription priced by user type, modules and deployment
- Cloud or on-premise deployment
- Implementation delivered by QAD or a partner and billed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Choose QAD Adaptive ERP if
- You need automotive edi.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want manufacturing execution.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenBOM or QAD Adaptive ERP better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenBOM starts at Free and QAD Adaptive ERP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenBOM or QAD Adaptive ERP?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenBOM and On request for QAD Adaptive ERP.
- Does OpenBOM or QAD Adaptive ERP run on more platforms?
- OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API. QAD Adaptive ERP runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. QAD Adaptive ERP starts at On request.
- What is OpenBOM best used for?
- OpenBOM is most often used for a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run, a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them, an electronics team pulling boms straight out of altium and mechanical cad instead of retyping them, a small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a plm project. Of those, a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run and a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them are not what QAD Adaptive ERP is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenBOM do that QAD Adaptive ERP cannot?
- OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management. QAD Adaptive ERP covers Automotive EDI, Manufacturing execution, Supply chain planning, Quality management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Who owns QAD?
Thoma Bravo, which took the company private in 2021. It is no longer publicly listed, so financials and roadmap commitments are not disclosed the way they once were.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Is QAD only for automotive?
No, but automotive supplier compliance is its deepest area, alongside life sciences, food and beverage and industrial manufacturing. Non-manufacturers are not the target.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Can it run on-premise?
Yes, both cloud and on-premise deployments are supported, which matters to manufacturers with plant-floor systems that cannot tolerate a WAN dependency.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Is Adaptive ERP an upgrade from MFG/PRO?
Not in practice for a customised site. Moving heavily modified MFG/PRO installations is a re-implementation project, and that cost should be in the business case from the start.
Related pages
More on QAD Adaptive ERP
Other head to heads
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Epicor
- OpenBOM vs Infor CloudSuite
- OpenBOM vs Visibility
- OpenBOM vs Metasfresh
- OpenBOM vs iDempiere
- OpenBOM vs Katana MRP
- OpenBOM vs Cin7
- OpenBOM vs SYSPRO
- OpenBOM vs GEP SMART
- OpenBOM vs Global Shop Solutions
- OpenBOM vs IFS Cloud
- OpenBOM vs ADempiere
- OpenBOM vs Java
- OpenBOM vs Levelpath
- OpenBOM vs OpenBravo
- OpenBOM vs Infor
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Fusion 360
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Aras Innovator
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Duro PLM
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs PTC Windchill
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Propel
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Materialise Magics
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Ignition
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Seeq
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs SolidWorks
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs AVEVA System Platform
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs AMFG
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Authentise
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs COPA-DATA zenon
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Autodesk Netfabb
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Arena PLM
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Epicor
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Visibility
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Metasfresh
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs iDempiere
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Katana MRP
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Cin7
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs SYSPRO
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs GEP SMART
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Global Shop Solutions
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs IFS Cloud
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs ADempiere
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Java
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Levelpath
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs OpenBravo
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Infor
