Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs QAD Adaptive ERP

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

QAD Adaptive ERP
ERP
ERP for regulated and supply-chain-heavy manufacturers, strongest in automotive and life sciences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; QAD Adaptive ERP no pricing is published and licensing splits across user types and separately sold modules, so first quotes routinely come in well above the number buyers had in their heads.
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, QAD Adaptive ERP covers Automotive EDI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and QAD Adaptive ERP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | QAD Adaptive ERP |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Category | Manufacturing | ERP |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in QAD Adaptive ERP
- Automotive EDI
- Manufacturing execution
- Supply chain planning
- Quality management
- Global financials
- Traceability and recall
- Connected workforce
- Adaptive UX
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot QAD Adaptive ERP
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot QAD Adaptive ERP
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot QAD Adaptive ERP
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot QAD Adaptive ERP
QAD Adaptive ERP
- An automotive tier supplier that must accept OEM EDI releases and ship to AIAG or Odette labelling without building it themselvesnot Materialise Magics
- A multi-plant manufacturer consolidating several plant-level ERPs onto one ledger with local statutory reporting per countrynot Materialise Magics
- A food or pharmaceutical maker that needs lot genealogy fast enough to scope a recall in hoursnot Materialise Magics
- A manufacturer replacing an ageing QAD MFG/PRO installation and wanting continuity of process rather than a rewritenot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
QAD Adaptive ERP
- No pricing is published and licensing splits across user types and separately sold modules, so first quotes routinely come in well above the number buyers had in their heads.
- QAD has been owned by Thoma Bravo since the 2021 take-private, so roadmap and pricing decisions answer to an investment thesis rather than to public product commitments, and buyers should ask about contract terms at renewal.
- The implementation partner network is small next to SAP, Oracle or Microsoft, which limits competitive tendering on services and makes regional coverage patchy.
- Outside its target industries the vertical depth is dead weight, and a general distributor or services firm pays for automotive and life sciences function it will never switch on.
- Long-standing QAD customers still run heavily customised MFG/PRO estates, and migrating those customisations to Adaptive ERP is a re-implementation, not an upgrade, which is why some sites have stayed on old versions for years.
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
QAD Adaptive ERP
On request- QAD Adaptive ERP$undefined/year
- Subscription priced by user type, modules and deployment
- Cloud or on-premise deployment
- Implementation delivered by QAD or a partner and billed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose QAD Adaptive ERP if
- You need automotive edi.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want manufacturing execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or QAD Adaptive ERP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and QAD Adaptive ERP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or QAD Adaptive ERP?
- Materialise Magics starts at On request and QAD Adaptive ERP at On request.
- Does Materialise Magics or QAD Adaptive ERP run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. QAD Adaptive ERP runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what QAD Adaptive ERP is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that QAD Adaptive ERP cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. QAD Adaptive ERP covers Automotive EDI, Manufacturing execution, Supply chain planning, Quality management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Who owns QAD?
Thoma Bravo, which took the company private in 2021. It is no longer publicly listed, so financials and roadmap commitments are not disclosed the way they once were.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Is QAD only for automotive?
No, but automotive supplier compliance is its deepest area, alongside life sciences, food and beverage and industrial manufacturing. Non-manufacturers are not the target.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Can it run on-premise?
Yes, both cloud and on-premise deployments are supported, which matters to manufacturers with plant-floor systems that cannot tolerate a WAN dependency.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
QAD Adaptive ERP: Is Adaptive ERP an upgrade from MFG/PRO?
Not in practice for a customised site. Moving heavily modified MFG/PRO installations is a re-implementation project, and that cost should be in the business case from the start.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
More on QAD Adaptive ERP
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Epicor
- Materialise Magics vs Infor CloudSuite
- Materialise Magics vs Visibility
- Materialise Magics vs Metasfresh
- Materialise Magics vs iDempiere
- Materialise Magics vs Katana MRP
- Materialise Magics vs Cin7
- Materialise Magics vs SYSPRO
- Materialise Magics vs GEP SMART
- Materialise Magics vs Global Shop Solutions
- Materialise Magics vs IFS Cloud
- Materialise Magics vs ADempiere
- Materialise Magics vs Java
- Materialise Magics vs Levelpath
- Materialise Magics vs OpenBravo
- Materialise Magics vs Infor
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Autodesk Netfabb
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Oqton
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs GrabCAD Print
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Formlabs PreForm
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Simplify3D
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Markforged Eiger
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs SolidWorks
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs AVEVA System Platform
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs 3YOURMIND
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Aras Innovator
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Authentise
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Dyndrite
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs QAD Redzone
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Seeq
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Sensemore
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs TrendMiner
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Epicor
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Visibility
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Metasfresh
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs iDempiere
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Katana MRP
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Cin7
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs SYSPRO
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs GEP SMART
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Global Shop Solutions
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs IFS Cloud
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs ADempiere
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Java
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Levelpath
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs OpenBravo
- QAD Adaptive ERP vs Infor
