Cybersecurity · head to head
Omada Identity vs Signicat

Omada Identity
Cybersecurity
Identity governance and administration focused on access certification and compliance evidence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Omada Identity pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: Omada Identity covers Access certification, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Omada Identity and Signicat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Omada Identity | Signicat |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Omada Identity
- Access certification
- Joiner mover leaver
- Role modelling
- Segregation of duties
- Access request
- Connectors
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Omada Identity
- An organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidencednot Signicat
- A company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last daynot Signicat
- A regulated firm needing documented segregation of duties across finance and ERP entitlementsnot Signicat
- A business that abandoned a previous multi-year IGA implementation and needs something that reaches production this yearnot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot Omada Identity
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot Omada Identity
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot Omada Identity
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot Omada Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Omada Identity
- Pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.
- It governs access but provides no single sign-on, multi-factor authentication or privileged session management, so it is always a second or third identity subscription rather than a consolidation.
- The fast-deployment promise depends on accepting its standard process model; organisations with genuinely unusual entitlement structures end up in custom work and the timeline advantage disappears.
- Connector coverage is strong for mainstream enterprise systems and thin for bespoke or industry-specific applications, and each custom connector is a project with ongoing maintenance.
- Data quality in the HR system determines whether joiner mover leaver automation works, so companies with messy HR records find the tool exposes that problem rather than solving it.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Omada Identity
On request- Omada Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per managed identity per year
- SaaS on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options
- Implementation delivered on a defined methodology, quoted separately
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose Omada Identity if
- You need access certification.
- You also want joiner mover leaver.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is Omada Identity or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Omada Identity starts at On request and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Omada Identity or Signicat?
- Omada Identity starts at On request and Signicat at On request.
- Does Omada Identity or Signicat run on more platforms?
- Omada Identity runs on Web. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Omada Identity best used for?
- Omada Identity is most often used for an organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidenced, a company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last day, a regulated firm needing documented segregation of duties across finance and erp entitlements, a business that abandoned a previous multi-year iga implementation and needs something that reaches production this year. Of those, an organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidenced and a company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last day are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can Omada Identity do that Signicat cannot?
- Omada Identity covers Access certification, Joiner mover leaver, Role modelling, Segregation of duties. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Omada Identity: Does it provide single sign-on?
No. Omada is governance only. You still need Entra ID, Okta or equivalent for authentication.
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
Omada Identity: How is it licensed?
Per managed identity per year. Count contractors and service accounts before you compare quotes, because they usually count.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Omada Identity: How long does deployment take?
Months rather than years is the positioning, and it is achievable if you accept the standard process model. Heavy customisation returns you to traditional IGA timelines.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Related pages
More on Omada Identity
Other head to heads
- Omada Identity vs Netwrix
- Omada Identity vs Saviynt
- Omada Identity vs One Identity
- Omada Identity vs Doppler
- Omada Identity vs Speakeasy
- Omada Identity vs Nessus
- Omada Identity vs Chainguard
- Omada Identity vs Fenergo
- Omada Identity vs Arnica
- Omada Identity vs KnowBe4
- Omada Identity vs Mimecast
- Omada Identity vs ThetaRay
- Omada Identity vs Trivy
- Omada Identity vs Trulioo
- Omada Identity vs Unit21
- Omada Identity vs Veracode
- Omada Identity vs Very Good Security
- Omada Identity vs Tenable
- Omada Identity vs Jumio
- Omada Identity vs Sumsub
- Omada Identity vs IDnow
- Omada Identity vs Veriff
- Omada Identity vs iDenfy
- Omada Identity vs Yoti
- Omada Identity vs Shufti Pro
- Omada Identity vs Socure
- Omada Identity vs March Networks
- Omada Identity vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Omada Identity vs Semperis
- Omada Identity vs MetricStream
- Omada Identity vs Microsoft Defender
- Omada Identity vs Motorola Vigilant
- Omada Identity vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Netwrix
- Signicat vs Saviynt
- Signicat vs One Identity
- Signicat vs Doppler
- Signicat vs Speakeasy
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Chainguard
- Signicat vs Fenergo
- Signicat vs Arnica
- Signicat vs KnowBe4
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs ThetaRay
- Signicat vs Trivy
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Unit21
- Signicat vs Veracode
- Signicat vs Very Good Security
- Signicat vs Tenable
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
