CAD · head to head
CoreTechnologie vs Shapr3D

CoreTechnologie
CAD
CAD format conversion, validation and additive build preparation from a German independent
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Shapr3D has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CoreTechnologie no pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.; Shapr3D the free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- They diverge on capability: CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Shapr3D covers Direct modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreTechnologie and Shapr3D actually diverge.
| Attribute | CoreTechnologie | Shapr3D |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | IPadOS, MacOS, Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreTechnologie
- Native CAD conversion
- Automatic geometry healing
- Feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- Batch and server conversion
- 3D_Analyzer
- 4D_Additive B-rep printing
Only in Shapr3D
- Direct modeling
- Parametric history
- Visualization
- 2D drawings
- Apple Pencil support
- Import/export
- Annotations
- Fusion 360
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreTechnologie
- A tier supplier that receives CATIA from one customer and NX from another and must work in SolidWorksnot Shapr3D
- A company migrating a CAD library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solidsnot Shapr3D
- Preparing additive builds from exact B-rep geometry where STL faceting would lose the tolerance you neednot Shapr3D
- Giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them CAD seatsnot Shapr3D
Shapr3D
- Direct modelling CAD on iPad with Apple Pencilnot CoreTechnologie
- Producing manufacturable solid models and technical drawingsnot CoreTechnologie
- Sharing CAD projects with collaborators on desktop and tabletnot CoreTechnologie
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreTechnologie
- No pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- Licensing is granular by format read and write pair, so the price you were quoted covers the translations you named and adding a customer with a different CAD platform later means going back for another line item.
- It is a small independent vendor, so a buyer standardising a critical migration pipeline on it should weigh the concentration risk and check the support arrangement in their own region rather than assume global coverage.
- Feature recognition on converted geometry works well on prismatic machined parts and much less well on complex freeform surfaces, so the rebuilt-as-editable claim needs testing on your own worst parts, not on a demo model.
- 4D_Additive competes with entrenched incumbents such as Magics in industrial AM, so machine-side Build Processor support and bureau familiarity are thinner, which matters if you need your service provider to accept the output.
Shapr3D
- The free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- Free plan exports only basic resolution 3MF and STL, so no STEP or IGES output
- Free plan caps generative renders at 3 per day; Pro raises this to 50 per day and only Enterprise is unlimited
- Importing SLDPRT and SLDASM SolidWorks files requires Pro
- Importing NX, JT, CREO, Solid Edge and Rhino files requires Enterprise
- Exporting ACIS, FBX, Parasolid and PRC requires Enterprise
- On premises and single tenant data storage is Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreTechnologie
On request- 3D_Evolution$undefined/year
- Native CAD conversion across around 36 formats
- Automatic healing and feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- 3D_Analyzer$undefined/year
- Cross-format viewing and measurement
- Wall thickness, draft and collision analysis
- Model comparison
- 4D_Additive$undefined/year
- B-rep based build preparation
- Texturing, nesting and lattice structures
- Automatic part analysis for printability
Shapr3D
Free- BasicFree
- 2 projects
- cloud storage
- basic import/export (XT, STEP, IGES, DWG, STL)
- Pro$299/year
- unlimited shared team projects
- up to 2 contributors
- high-resolution exports
- Enterprise$null/custom
- granular access control
- flexible data storage (single tenant/private cloud/on-premises)
- unlimited renders
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreTechnologie if
- You need native cad conversion.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want automatic geometry healing.
Choose Shapr3D if
- You need direct modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want parametric history.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreTechnologie or Shapr3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreTechnologie starts at On request and Shapr3D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreTechnologie or Shapr3D?
- Shapr3D has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CoreTechnologie and Free for Shapr3D.
- Does CoreTechnologie or Shapr3D run on more platforms?
- CoreTechnologie runs on Windows, Linux. Shapr3D runs on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- Can I use Shapr3D for free?
- Yes. Shapr3D has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CoreTechnologie starts at On request.
- What is CoreTechnologie best used for?
- CoreTechnologie is most often used for a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks, a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids, preparing additive builds from exact b-rep geometry where stl faceting would lose the tolerance you need, giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them cad seats. Of those, a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks and a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids are not what Shapr3D is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreTechnologie do that Shapr3D cannot?
- CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Automatic geometry healing, Feature recognition, Simplification and defeaturing. Shapr3D covers Direct modeling, Parametric history, Visualization, 2D drawings.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreTechnologie: Is CoreTechnologie owned by a CAD vendor?
No. It is an independent German company, which is the main reason it appears in supply chains that must move data between competing CAD platforms.
Shapr3D: How much does Shapr3D cost?
Shapr3D Basic tier is free. Pro tier is $299 per year or available monthly with price not specified on the pricing page. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Does conversion produce editable models?
3D_Evolution has feature recognition that rebuilds parametric features from solids. It is reliable on prismatic machined geometry and weaker on complex freeform surfaces, so test it on your hardest parts.
Shapr3D: Is there a free trial for Shapr3D Pro?
Yes, Shapr3D offers a 14-day free trial for Pro tier that requires a credit card, plus a 14-day money-back guarantee on purchases.
SourceCoreTechnologie: What makes 4D_Additive different from a normal slicer?
It prepares builds on exact B-rep geometry rather than converting to STL first, so tolerance and surface accuracy are not lost to faceting before printing.
Shapr3D: What is the difference between Shapr3D Pro and Enterprise?
Pro tier includes up to 2 contributors on unlimited shared team projects, 50 renders daily, technical drawings, and AR on iPad. Enterprise provides granular access control, flexible data storage options (single tenant, private cloud, on-premises, or cloud off), unlimited renders, extended import/export formats, and dedicated account management.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Can it run unattended for large migrations?
Yes. Batch and server conversion is designed for high-volume migration and PLM pipeline use rather than desk-by-desk conversion.
Shapr3D: Does Shapr3D offer educational pricing?
Yes, Shapr3D is free for students and educators with annual license renewal through an in-app application form.
SourceRelated pages
More on CoreTechnologie
Other head to heads
- CoreTechnologie vs FreeCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Siemens NX
- CoreTechnologie vs CATIA
- CoreTechnologie vs nTop
- CoreTechnologie vs ANSYS Fluent
- CoreTechnologie vs Bambu Studio
- CoreTechnologie vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CoreTechnologie vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CoreTechnologie vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley MicroStation
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CoreTechnologie vs BricsCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Arnold
- CoreTechnologie vs Carlson Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Corona Renderer
- CoreTechnologie vs Inventor
- CoreTechnologie vs Mudbox
- CoreTechnologie vs V-Ray
- CoreTechnologie vs Enscape
- CoreTechnologie vs KeyShot
- CoreTechnologie vs IronCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Creo
- CoreTechnologie vs Houdini
- CoreTechnologie vs Plasticity
- CoreTechnologie vs 3D-Coat
- CoreTechnologie vs Alibre Design
- CoreTechnologie vs Substance 3D Designer
- CoreTechnologie vs Vectorworks
- CoreTechnologie vs Zoo
- CoreTechnologie vs Twinmotion
- CoreTechnologie vs Tinkercad
- Shapr3D vs FreeCAD
- Shapr3D vs Siemens NX
- Shapr3D vs CATIA
- Shapr3D vs nTop
- Shapr3D vs ANSYS Fluent
- Shapr3D vs Bambu Studio
- Shapr3D vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Shapr3D vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Shapr3D vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Shapr3D vs Bentley MicroStation
- Shapr3D vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Shapr3D vs BricsCAD
- Shapr3D vs Arnold
- Shapr3D vs Carlson Software
- Shapr3D vs Corona Renderer
- Shapr3D vs Inventor
- Shapr3D vs Mudbox
- Shapr3D vs V-Ray
- Shapr3D vs Enscape
- Shapr3D vs KeyShot
- Shapr3D vs IronCAD
- Shapr3D vs Creo
- Shapr3D vs Houdini
- Shapr3D vs Plasticity
- Shapr3D vs 3D-Coat
- Shapr3D vs Alibre Design
- Shapr3D vs Substance 3D Designer
- Shapr3D vs Vectorworks
- Shapr3D vs Zoo
- Shapr3D vs Twinmotion
- Shapr3D vs Tinkercad

