CAD · head to head
Mari vs nTop

nTop
CAD
Implicit computational design for lattices, heat exchangers and topology-driven parts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Mari has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Mari the full annual licence is $1,289 paid annually, and a short term quarterly rental is $949 per quarter; nTop nTop is a specialist tool that sits alongside mainstream CAD rather than replacing it, so you pay for an extra seat and accept a handoff between two geometry systems.
- They diverge on capability: Mari covers High-resolution painting, nTop covers Implicit modelling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mari and nTop actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mari
- High-resolution painting
- UDIM support
- Procedural layers
- Baking
- Node graph
- Color management
- Maya
- Nuke
Only in nTop
- Implicit modelling
- Lattice and cellular structures
- Field-driven design
- Integrated simulation
- Reusable workflows
- Topology optimisation
- CAD and AM interoperability
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mari
- Painting textures directly onto high complexity 3D assets for film and gamesnot nTop
- Handling very large multi-UDIM texture sets in a look development pipelinenot nTop
nTop
- Designing a variable-density lattice bracket where mass must drop without losing stiffness in the loaded regionsnot Mari
- Generating a heat exchanger with thousands of internal channels that a conventional CAD kernel cannot representnot Mari
- Producing patient-specific implant geometry with porous surfaces at scale rather than one at a timenot Mari
- Automating a family of parts as a reusable design workflow that reruns when the load case changesnot Mari
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mari
- The full annual licence is $1,289 paid annually, and a short term quarterly rental is $949 per quarter
- The cheap $299 per year or $35 per month subscription is restricted to a single licence for people working alone or in small companies
- Node-locked and floating are separate licence types you must choose between
- All listed prices are before applicable taxes
- A separate non-commercial licence exists, so commercial use requires a paid tier
nTop
- nTop is a specialist tool that sits alongside mainstream CAD rather than replacing it, so you pay for an extra seat and accept a handoff between two geometry systems.
- Implicit modelling requires a different way of thinking from feature-based CAD, and the retraining period is long enough that unused licences are a common and expensive outcome.
- No pricing is published and there is no free or hobbyist tier, so evaluation runs through a sales process and small teams cannot try it seriously without engaging.
- Subscription only, with no perpetual licence, means the geometry logic you built stops being editable the day you stop paying, which is a real risk for long-lifecycle aerospace and medical programmes.
- The output is most valuable when you have additive manufacturing capacity to make it; organisations without machines that can print the geometry end up designing parts nobody can produce.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mari
Free- Individual Subscription$86/month
- Solo artists or small companies
- $689 per year alternative billing
- Team Subscription$null/year
- Node-locked or floating licenses
- Annual payment
- Team Rental$949/quarter
- Short-term access
- Node-locked or floating licenses
nTop
On request- nTop$undefined/year
- Annual named or floating seat subscription
- No perpetual licence offered
- Capability tiers quoted by use case
Which should you pick?
Choose Mari if
- You need high-resolution painting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want udim support.
Choose nTop if
- You need implicit modelling.
- You work on Windows, Cloud.
- You also want lattice and cellular structures.
Questions people ask
- Is Mari or nTop better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mari starts at Free and nTop at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mari or nTop?
- Mari has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Mari and On request for nTop.
- Does Mari or nTop run on more platforms?
- Mari runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. nTop runs on Windows, Cloud.
- Can I use Mari for free?
- Yes. Mari has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. nTop starts at On request.
- What is Mari best used for?
- Mari is most often used for painting textures directly onto high complexity 3d assets for film and games, handling very large multi-udim texture sets in a look development pipeline. Of those, painting textures directly onto high complexity 3d assets for film and games and handling very large multi-udim texture sets in a look development pipeline are not what nTop is typically brought in for.
- What can Mari do that nTop cannot?
- Mari covers High-resolution painting, UDIM support, Procedural layers, Baking. nTop covers Implicit modelling, Lattice and cellular structures, Field-driven design, Integrated simulation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Mari: What is Mari's pricing?
Individual Subscription costs $689 per year or $86 per month. Team Subscription costs $1,289 per year. Team Rental costs $949 per quarter for short-term access. Both subscriptions support node-locked or floating licenses.
SourcenTop: Is nTop the same company as nTopology?
Yes. nTopology rebranded to nTop. The product is the same lineage.
Mari: Does Mari offer a free trial?
Mari offers a free 30-day trial with unrestricted access to help users evaluate the software before purchasing.
SourcenTop: Does it replace SolidWorks or NX?
No. It is used alongside them. Mainstream CAD handles the conventional geometry and assembly; nTop handles the lattice, field-driven and complex internal structure work.
Mari: Does Mari offer student pricing?
Yes, Mari offers free or discounted access to all Foundry products for students, as well as free non-commercial licenses for learning and exploration.
SourcenTop: Is there a free version?
No free commercial tier is published. Access runs through a demo and sales process, with academic programmes handled separately.
nTop: Can I buy a perpetual licence?
No. It is sold as an annual subscription, so budget it as recurring cost across the life of the programme.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Mari vs FreeCAD
- Mari vs V-Ray
- Mari vs Enscape
- Mari vs KeyShot
- Mari vs Arnold
- Mari vs LightWave 3D
- Mari vs 3D-Coat
- Mari vs Houdini
- Mari vs PrusaSlicer
- Mari vs Siemens NX
- Mari vs Lumion
- Mari vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Mari vs CoreTechnologie
- Mari vs DraftSight
- Mari vs IronCAD
- Mari vs KiCad
- Mari vs Redshift
- Mari vs Mudbox
- Mari vs ANSYS Fluent
- Mari vs Bambu Studio
- Mari vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Mari vs SolveSpace
- Mari vs Zoo
- Mari vs OnShape
- Mari vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Mari vs Alibre Design
- Mari vs Modo
- nTop vs FreeCAD
- nTop vs V-Ray
- nTop vs Enscape
- nTop vs KeyShot
- nTop vs Arnold
- nTop vs LightWave 3D
- nTop vs 3D-Coat
- nTop vs Houdini
- nTop vs PrusaSlicer
- nTop vs Siemens NX
- nTop vs Lumion
- nTop vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- nTop vs CoreTechnologie
- nTop vs DraftSight
- nTop vs IronCAD
- nTop vs KiCad
- nTop vs Redshift
- nTop vs Mudbox
- nTop vs ANSYS Fluent
- nTop vs Bambu Studio
- nTop vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- nTop vs SolveSpace
- nTop vs Zoo
- nTop vs OnShape
- nTop vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- nTop vs Alibre Design
- nTop vs Modo

