Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs OpsLevel

OpsLevel
Developer Tools
Internal developer portal that scores service ownership and production readiness
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Neo4j is a native graph database.
- Neo4j starts at $65/mo; OpsLevel prices on request.
- Only Neo4j lists native Graph Storage; only OpsLevel lists service catalogue.
- Where Neo4j falls short: AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and OpsLevel actually diverge.
Not yet recorded: founded for OpsLevel.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in OpsLevel
- Service catalogue
- Scorecards and rubric
- Checks
- Campaigns
- Self-service actions
- Slack and Teams integration
- Catalogue auto-enrichment
- Deployment on request
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot OpsLevel
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot OpsLevel
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot OpsLevel
OpsLevel
- A platform team that needs to prove every production service has a named owner and an on-call rota before an auditnot Neo4j
- Driving a fleet-wide migration such as a runtime upgrade across 400 services with a deadline and visible progressnot Neo4j
- Giving developers a paved road to create a new service from a template without waiting on the platform teamnot Neo4j
- An organisation where an incident took an hour to route because nobody could identify the owning teamnot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
OpsLevel
- OpsLevel does not publish prices at all, not even a starting figure, so you cannot size a budget or compare against Backstage's zero licence cost without entering a sales cycle
- The Standard plan caps at 50 users, which is below the size at which service ownership becomes a real problem, so most genuine buyers land on Enterprise and its unpublished pricing
- Scores are only as honest as the metadata teams maintain; where ownership records go stale the rubric produces confident numbers about a catalogue that no longer reflects reality, and leadership acts on them
- It reports on quality rather than producing it, so it can generate friction between platform teams who set the rubric and product teams who see it as a scoreboard imposed on them without extra headcount to fix the findings
- As a hosted product it needs read access to source control, cloud accounts and observability tooling, which is a meaningful vendor review in regulated environments; on-premises exists but only on the Enterprise tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/gb/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/gb/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated CloudOn request
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
OpsLevel
On request- StandardOn request
- Up to 50 users
- Unlimited catalogued components
- Scorecards, campaigns and the global rubric
- EnterpriseOn request
- Unlimited users
- Custom integrations
- Customisable dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or OpsLevel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and OpsLevel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or OpsLevel?
- Neo4j has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Neo4j and On request for OpsLevel.
- Does Neo4j or OpsLevel run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web. OpsLevel runs on Web.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Yes. Neo4j has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OpsLevel starts at On request.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what OpsLevel is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that OpsLevel cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. OpsLevel covers Service catalogue, Scorecards and rubric, Checks, Campaigns.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceOpsLevel: How much does OpsLevel cost?
It does not publish pricing. Billing is per developer using the portal, with volume discounts, and a quote requires a sales conversation.
Neo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceOpsLevel: How does it compare with Backstage?
Backstage has no licence fee but you staff a team to build and run it. OpsLevel is hosted with checks, campaigns and scorecards out of the box, and you pay per developer instead.
Neo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceOpsLevel: Does it require writing catalogue YAML by hand?
No. It auto-discovers and enriches entries from connected systems, though teams still curate ownership and metadata.
OpsLevel: Can it run on premises?
Yes, but only on the Enterprise plan.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs DataGrip
- Neo4j vs MongoDB
- Neo4j vs RavenDB
- Neo4j vs ScyllaDB
- Neo4j vs Vitess
- Neo4j vs Aiven
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs CosmosDB
- Neo4j vs DataStax
- Neo4j vs dbt
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Backstage
- Neo4j vs Earthly
- Neo4j vs Docker
- Neo4j vs Cortex
- Neo4j vs Blacksmith
- Neo4j vs Jenkins
- Neo4j vs Nix
- Neo4j vs Kubernetes
- Neo4j vs LaunchDarkly
- Neo4j vs Terraform
- Neo4j vs Depot
- Neo4j vs Spacelift
- Neo4j vs GoLand
- Neo4j vs Hookdeck
- Neo4j vs Istio
- Neo4j vs JFrog Artifactory
- Neo4j vs Namespace
- Neo4j vs Nixpacks
- OpsLevel vs Elasticsearch
- OpsLevel vs ArangoDB
- OpsLevel vs Dgraph
- OpsLevel vs Firebase Realtime Database
- OpsLevel vs DynamoDB
- OpsLevel vs Couchbase
- OpsLevel vs Cassandra
- OpsLevel vs DataGrip
- OpsLevel vs MongoDB
- OpsLevel vs RavenDB
- OpsLevel vs ScyllaDB
- OpsLevel vs Vitess
- OpsLevel vs Aiven
- OpsLevel vs BigQuery
- OpsLevel vs CosmosDB
- OpsLevel vs DataStax
- OpsLevel vs dbt
- OpsLevel vs CouchDB
- OpsLevel vs Backstage
- OpsLevel vs Earthly
- OpsLevel vs Docker
- OpsLevel vs Cortex
- OpsLevel vs Blacksmith
- OpsLevel vs Jenkins
- OpsLevel vs Nix
- OpsLevel vs Kubernetes
- OpsLevel vs LaunchDarkly
- OpsLevel vs Terraform
- OpsLevel vs Depot
- OpsLevel vs Spacelift
- OpsLevel vs GoLand
- OpsLevel vs Hookdeck
- OpsLevel vs Istio
- OpsLevel vs JFrog Artifactory
- OpsLevel vs Namespace
- OpsLevel vs Nixpacks

