Government · head to head
MyRec.com vs Ping Identity

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MyRec.com and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | MyRec.com | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | Per year by department annual revenue | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot Ping Identity
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot Ping Identity
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot Ping Identity
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot MyRec.com
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot MyRec.com
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot MyRec.com
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot MyRec.com
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is MyRec.com or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. MyRec.com starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MyRec.com or Ping Identity?
- MyRec.com starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does MyRec.com or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- MyRec.com runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is MyRec.com best used for?
- MyRec.com is most often used for a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet, a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate, replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsell, a department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suite. Of those, a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet and a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can MyRec.com do that Ping Identity cannot?
- MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
MyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
MyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
MyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- MyRec.com vs Frontegg
- MyRec.com vs Speakeasy
- MyRec.com vs Akeyless
- MyRec.com vs authentik
- MyRec.com vs Logto
- MyRec.com vs Authelia
- MyRec.com vs Transmit Security
- MyRec.com vs Delinea
- MyRec.com vs Genetec Security Center
- MyRec.com vs VMware Carbon Black
- MyRec.com vs Rhombus Systems
- MyRec.com vs Yoti
- MyRec.com vs Avast One
- MyRec.com vs Chainguard
- MyRec.com vs Cosign
- MyRec.com vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs CivicPlus
- Ping Identity vs OpenGov
- Ping Identity vs RecDesk
- Ping Identity vs Euna Solutions
- Ping Identity vs Springbrook Software
- Ping Identity vs Periscope Holdings
- Ping Identity vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Ping Identity vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Ping Identity vs GovPilot
- Ping Identity vs eCode360
- Ping Identity vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Ping Identity vs IAPro
- Ping Identity vs iCompass
- Ping Identity vs Mapbox Government
- Ping Identity vs Mark43
- Ping Identity vs MuckRock
- Ping Identity vs Municode
- Ping Identity vs Rock Solid
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
