Cybersecurity · head to head
Cosign vs MyRec.com

Cosign
Cybersecurity
Signs and verifies container images and artifacts, with or without managing keys
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Cosign has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cosign keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.; MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- They diverge on capability: Cosign covers Keyless signing, MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cosign and MyRec.com actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cosign
- Keyless signing
- Key and KMS signing
- Registry-native storage
- In-toto attestations
- Offline verification
- Trusted root and signing config
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cosign
- Signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keysnot MyRec.com
- Attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenancenot MyRec.com
- Meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifactsnot MyRec.com
- Verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registrynot MyRec.com
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot Cosign
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot Cosign
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot Cosign
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot Cosign
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cosign
- Keyless signing inherits every weakness of the identity provider behind it. Sigstore’s own threat model states that if an identity provider is compromised, Sigstore will issue certificates to those identities, so a compromised account produces perfectly valid signatures.
- A signature proves who signed, never whether they should have. The documentation is explicit that Sigstore cannot determine authorisation, so every consumer must write and maintain their own identity and issuer policy or verification means nothing.
- Nothing is enforced without an admission controller. Signing changes what you can prove, not what runs, and the official policy controller has a small maintainer base for a component sitting in a cluster admission path.
- Upgrades break pipelines. Version 3 changed defaults, version 4 is announced as removing legacy functionality and roughly half the command line flags, and two official client libraries still lacked support for the new log format as of mid 2026.
- Signatures do not expire. An artifact signed before a maintainer account was compromised and one signed after are indistinguishable unless somebody is actively monitoring the transparency log, and almost nobody is.
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cosign
Free- CosignFree
- Apache-2.0
- Public Sigstore infrastructure free to use
- No usage limits published
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
Which should you pick?
Choose Cosign if
- You need keyless signing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want key and kms signing.
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Questions people ask
- Is Cosign or MyRec.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cosign starts at Free and MyRec.com at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cosign or MyRec.com?
- Cosign has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cosign and On request for MyRec.com.
- Does Cosign or MyRec.com run on more platforms?
- Cosign runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. MyRec.com runs on Web.
- Can I use Cosign for free?
- Yes. Cosign has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. MyRec.com starts at On request.
- What is Cosign best used for?
- Cosign is most often used for signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keys, attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenance, meeting a customer or regulatory requirement for signed artifacts, verifying third-party images before they enter an internal registry. Of those, signing container images in a build pipeline without managing long-lived private keys and attaching a signed bill of materials to a release so consumers can verify its provenance are not what MyRec.com is typically brought in for.
- What can Cosign do that MyRec.com cannot?
- Cosign covers Keyless signing, Key and KMS signing, Registry-native storage, In-toto attestations. MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cosign: Does Cosign tell me if an image is vulnerable?
No. It has no vulnerability knowledge whatsoever. It can carry an SBOM as a signed attestation but never reads it. Pair it with a scanner.
MyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
Cosign: Is signing alone enough?
No. Verification is a command somebody runs. Without an admission controller enforcing it, an unsigned image still runs.
MyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
Cosign: What does a bare cosign verify actually prove?
Very little. Without a pinned certificate identity and OIDC issuer, it accepts a valid signature from any identity at all.
MyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
Cosign: What is the risk of keyless signing?
Your OIDC provider becomes the root of trust. Compromise of that account yields genuine, verifiable signatures, so account security is the control that matters.
MyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
Cosign: Should we expect breaking changes?
Yes. Version 4 is announced to remove roughly half the flags, and a post-quantum migration is named as a further breaking change after that.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cosign vs Sigstore
- Cosign vs Syft
- Cosign vs Chainguard
- Cosign vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cosign vs Infisical
- Cosign vs OWASP ZAP
- Cosign vs Wireshark
- Cosign vs Bitwarden
- Cosign vs Semgrep
- Cosign vs Trivy
- Cosign vs authentik
- Cosign vs Microsoft Intune
- Cosign vs Netwrix
- Cosign vs NordVPN
- Cosign vs Omada Identity
- Cosign vs Ory
- Cosign vs ProtonVPN
- Cosign vs Grype
- Cosign vs CivicPlus
- Cosign vs OpenGov
- Cosign vs RecDesk
- Cosign vs Euna Solutions
- Cosign vs Springbrook Software
- Cosign vs Periscope Holdings
- Cosign vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Cosign vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Cosign vs GovPilot
- Cosign vs eCode360
- Cosign vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Cosign vs IAPro
- Cosign vs iCompass
- Cosign vs Mapbox Government
- Cosign vs Mark43
- Cosign vs MuckRock
- Cosign vs Municode
- Cosign vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs Sigstore
- MyRec.com vs Syft
- MyRec.com vs Chainguard
- MyRec.com vs HashiCorp Vault
- MyRec.com vs Infisical
- MyRec.com vs OWASP ZAP
- MyRec.com vs Wireshark
- MyRec.com vs Bitwarden
- MyRec.com vs Semgrep
- MyRec.com vs Trivy
- MyRec.com vs authentik
- MyRec.com vs Microsoft Intune
- MyRec.com vs Netwrix
- MyRec.com vs NordVPN
- MyRec.com vs Omada Identity
- MyRec.com vs Ory
- MyRec.com vs ProtonVPN
- MyRec.com vs Grype
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
