Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs Particle

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; Particle paid capacity is sold in blocks of 100 devices rather than per device, so 101 devices costs the same as 200
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Particle covers Device OS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and Particle actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | Particle |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Particle devices, Custom hardware, Cloud, Mobile apps |
| Category | Networking | Smart Home |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in Particle
- Device OS
- Cloud Platform
- Device Management
- OTA Updates
- REST API
- WebHooks
- Integration marketplace
- 3rd party services
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Particle
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Particle
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Particle
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Particle
Particle
- Connecting cellular and wifi IoT devices to a managed cloud platformnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Deploying firmware updates and collecting device telemetry at fleet scalenot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Particle
- Paid capacity is sold in blocks of 100 devices rather than per device, so 101 devices costs the same as 200
- The Basic block is $299 a month and the Plus block $599 a month
- The free tier allows 100 devices and 100,000 data operations a month
- Data operations are the billing unit, so chatty firmware costs more than the device count suggests
- No overage rates are published at any tier, so exceeding an allowance has no stated cost
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Particle
Free- MakerFree
- 5 free devices
- Cloud access
- Basic features
- Production$100/month
- Unlimited devices
- Advanced analytics
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose Particle if
- You need device os.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Particle devices, Custom hardware, Cloud, Mobile apps.
- You also want cloud platform.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or Particle better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Particle at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or Particle?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Particle at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or Particle run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. Particle runs on Particle devices, Custom hardware, Cloud, Mobile apps.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what Particle is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that Particle cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. Particle covers Device OS, Cloud Platform, Device Management, OTA Updates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Particle: What are the Particle pricing tiers and their costs?
Particle offers Free ($0, 100 devices, 100K Data Operations/month), Basic ($299/month per block), Plus ($599/month per block), Professional (custom pricing), and Enterprise (custom pricing). Each block supports 100 devices.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Particle: What is a Data Operation and how is it charged?
A Data Operation is Particle's billing unit for user-controlled activities. One operation is charged per device-to-cloud message, cloud-to-device message, Location Fusion call, Ledger sync, or Logic function run. Network transmission and management tasks are included at no additional cost.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Particle: What location data retention does each tier provide?
Location data retention ranges from 3 days in the Free tier up to 6+ months in Professional and Enterprise tiers.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Particle: Are there additional costs for support or single sign-on?
Premium support and SSO are available as optional add-ons to all Particle plans. The pricing page does not specify the cost of these add-ons.
SourceParticle: Is there a minimum contract length or can I cancel anytime?
The Particle pricing page does not specify a minimum contract length, suggesting monthly billing without long-term lock-in.
SourceRelated pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Amazon Alexa
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Apple HomeKit
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Google Home
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Home Assistant
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Blynk
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Arduino Cloud
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Node-RED
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Losant
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Thread
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MQTT
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs SmartThings
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zigbee Alliance
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Meross
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nanoleaf
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenHAB
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Philips Hue
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ring
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Roomba
- Particle vs HiveMQ
- Particle vs Traefik
- Particle vs pfSense
- Particle vs OpenVPN
- Particle vs Icinga
- Particle vs Consul
- Particle vs LibreNMS
- Particle vs Zabbix
- Particle vs Nebula
- Particle vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Particle vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Particle vs Netdata
- Particle vs Catchpoint
- Particle vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Particle vs Amazon Alexa
- Particle vs Apple HomeKit
- Particle vs Google Home
- Particle vs Home Assistant
- Particle vs Blynk
- Particle vs Arduino Cloud
- Particle vs Node-RED
- Particle vs Losant
- Particle vs Thread
- Particle vs MQTT
- Particle vs SmartThings
- Particle vs Zigbee Alliance
- Particle vs Meross
- Particle vs Nanoleaf
- Particle vs OpenHAB
- Particle vs Philips Hue
- Particle vs Ring
- Particle vs Roomba

