Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs MQTT

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; MQTT mQTT is an open-source protocol standard with no commercial pricing; not a commercial product
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, MQTT covers Publish-Subscribe.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and MQTT actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Any platform, Embedded devices, Cloud, Edge computing |
| Category | Networking | Smart Home |
| Founded | Unknown | 1999 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in MQTT
- Publish-Subscribe
- Lightweight
- QoS Levels
- Retained Messages
- IoT platforms
- Home automation
- Cloud services
- Edge devices
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot MQTT
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot MQTT
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot MQTT
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot MQTT
MQTT
- IoT messagingnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Sensor datanot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Real-time updatesnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Device telemetrynot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
MQTT
- MQTT is an open-source protocol standard with no commercial pricing; not a commercial product
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
MQTT
Free- Open ProtocolFree
- Publish-subscribe
- Lightweight
- QoS levels
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose MQTT if
- You need publish-subscribe.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Any platform, Embedded devices, Cloud, Edge computing.
- You also want lightweight.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or MQTT better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and MQTT at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or MQTT?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and MQTT at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or MQTT run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. MQTT runs on Any platform, Embedded devices, Cloud, Edge computing.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what MQTT is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that MQTT cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. MQTT covers Publish-Subscribe, Lightweight, QoS Levels, Retained Messages.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
MQTT: Does MQTT have a commercial license cost?
MQTT is an open-source communication protocol and standard. No pricing is published because MQTT itself is not a commercial product for sale.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Home Assistant
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Amazon Alexa
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Apple HomeKit
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Google Home
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Thread
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zigbee Alliance
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Z-Wave Alliance
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Arduino Cloud
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Node-RED
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Blynk
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Losant
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LIFX
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ThingWorx
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs TP-Link Kasa
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Aqara
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Matter
- MQTT vs HiveMQ
- MQTT vs Traefik
- MQTT vs pfSense
- MQTT vs OpenVPN
- MQTT vs Icinga
- MQTT vs Consul
- MQTT vs LibreNMS
- MQTT vs Zabbix
- MQTT vs Nebula
- MQTT vs MikroTik RouterOS
- MQTT vs PRTG Network Monitor
- MQTT vs Netdata
- MQTT vs Catchpoint
- MQTT vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- MQTT vs Home Assistant
- MQTT vs Amazon Alexa
- MQTT vs Apple HomeKit
- MQTT vs Google Home
- MQTT vs Thread
- MQTT vs Zigbee Alliance
- MQTT vs Z-Wave Alliance
- MQTT vs Arduino Cloud
- MQTT vs Node-RED
- MQTT vs Blynk
- MQTT vs Losant
- MQTT vs LIFX
- MQTT vs ThingWorx
- MQTT vs TP-Link Kasa
- MQTT vs Aqara
- MQTT vs Matter

