AR/VR & Metaverse · head to head
Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ShapesXR
Microsoft HoloLens 2
AR/VR & Metaverse
Enterprise mixed reality for the modern workplace
- From
- $3500/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only ShapesXR has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft HoloLens 2 narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close; ShapesXR the free Starter plan allows only 1 editable Space, 10 Frames per Space and 1 Viewpoint
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, ShapesXR covers XR prototyping.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft HoloLens 2 and ShapesXR actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft HoloLens 2 | ShapesXR |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3500/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Standalone AR Headset | Vr, Ar, Quest, Web |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (AR/VR & Metaverse).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Spatial mapping
- Hand tracking
- Eye tracking
- Holographic display
- Azure
- Dynamics 365
- Microsoft Teams
- Mixed-reality support
Only in ShapesXR
- XR prototyping
- Real-time collaboration
- Interactions
- Asset library
- Figma
- Sketch
- Adobe XD
- Vr support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- VR Gamingnot ShapesXR
- AR Marketingnot ShapesXR
- Virtual Trainingnot ShapesXR
- 3D Visualizationnot ShapesXR
- Immersive Experiencesnot ShapesXR
ShapesXR
- Designing and prototyping spatial and XR interfaces in a headsetnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Reviewing 3D product designs in context with a distributed teamnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Bringing Figma designs into VR for spatial layoutnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close
- Heavy weight makes extended wearing uncomfortable and impractical for sessions longer than a few hours
- Short battery life of 2.5 to 5.5 hours limits extended deployments without charging
- Display is sensitive to bright light and sunlight, with rainbow color artifacts and poor outdoor readability
- High price of $3,500 limits accessibility to enterprises with substantial budgets
ShapesXR
- The free Starter plan allows only 1 editable Space, 10 Frames per Space and 1 Viewpoint
- The free Starter plan caps imports at 20MB and the canvas at 100 square metres
- The Figma plugin, playable Figma prototypes and 200MB imports require a paid plan
- Roles, permissions, presentation tools and a shared team asset library require the Business plan
- Single sign on, multi-factor authentication and premium support are Enterprise only
- No prices are published for the Professional, Business or Enterprise plans; each is Get a quote
- The Business trial is 14 days
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft HoloLens 2
$3500/one-timeNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft HoloLens 2 review.
ShapesXR
Free- FreeFree
- 3 projects
- Collaboration
- Basic export
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft HoloLens 2 if
- You need spatial mapping.
- You work on Standalone AR Headset.
- You also want hand tracking.
Choose ShapesXR if
- You need xr prototyping.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Vr, Ar, Quest, Web.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft HoloLens 2 or ShapesXR better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft HoloLens 2 starts at $3500/one-time and ShapesXR at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft HoloLens 2 or ShapesXR?
- ShapesXR has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3500/one-time for Microsoft HoloLens 2 and Free for ShapesXR.
- Does Microsoft HoloLens 2 or ShapesXR run on more platforms?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 runs on Standalone AR Headset. ShapesXR runs on Vr, Ar, Quest, Web.
- Can I use ShapesXR for free?
- Yes. ShapesXR has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Microsoft HoloLens 2 starts at $3500/one-time.
- What is Microsoft HoloLens 2 best used for?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 is most often used for vr gaming, ar marketing, virtual training, 3d visualization. Of those, vr gaming and ar marketing are not what ShapesXR is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft HoloLens 2 do that ShapesXR cannot?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, Hand tracking, Eye tracking, Holographic display. ShapesXR covers XR prototyping, Real-time collaboration, Interactions, Asset library.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft HoloLens 2: How long is the battery life of HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 battery life is 2.5 to 5.5 hours of active use depending on workload intensity and brightness settings.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the field of view for HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 has a 52-degree field of view (43 degrees horizontal and 29 degrees vertical), which is considered narrow and limits the visible hologram area when viewing objects up close.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: Can HoloLens 2 be worn over glasses?
Yes, HoloLens 2 can be worn directly over glasses with an ergonomic design that allows the visor to flip up, though comfort depends on the glasses' size and weight.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the price of HoloLens 2?
The HoloLens 2 costs $3,500 USD with enterprise rental options at $125 per month and developer rental at $99 per month.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft HoloLens 2
Other head to heads
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARCore
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARKit
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Meta Quest
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Apple Vision Pro
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Unity AR Foundation
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs HTC Vive
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs 8th Wall
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Lens Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Vuforia
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs A-Frame
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Babylon.js
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Niantic Lightship
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs PlayStation VR2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Spark AR Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs TikTok Effect House
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Gravity Sketch
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Instagram AR Effects
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Magic Leap 2
- ShapesXR vs ARCore
- ShapesXR vs ARKit
- ShapesXR vs Meta Quest
- ShapesXR vs Apple Vision Pro
- ShapesXR vs Unity AR Foundation
- ShapesXR vs HTC Vive
- ShapesXR vs 8th Wall
- ShapesXR vs Lens Studio
- ShapesXR vs Vuforia
- ShapesXR vs A-Frame
- ShapesXR vs Babylon.js
- ShapesXR vs Niantic Lightship
- ShapesXR vs PlayStation VR2
- ShapesXR vs Spark AR Studio
- ShapesXR vs TikTok Effect House
- ShapesXR vs Gravity Sketch
- ShapesXR vs Instagram AR Effects
- ShapesXR vs Magic Leap 2

