Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Metaview vs Otter.ai

Metaview logo

Metaview

Recruitment

AI notetaking and sourcing agents for recruiters, priced per agent rather than per platform

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Otter.ai logo

Otter.ai

Remote Work

Transcription and meeting notes powered by AI

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Metaview pricing is per user per agent, so a five-person team using notetaking, sourcing and application review multiplies quickly; the visible 100 USD figure is one agent for one recruiter, not a team subscription.; Otter.ai two separate limits apply at once, a monthly minute allowance and a per conversation cap, so a long meeting can be cut short with allowance remaining
  • They diverge on capability: Metaview covers Structured interview notes, Otter.ai covers Automatic transcription.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Metaview and Otter.ai actually diverge.

Attributes where Metaview and Otter.ai differ
AttributeMetaviewOtter.ai
Pricing modelPer user per month, per agentfreemium
PlatformsWeb, Chrome extensionWeb, Ios, Android, Mac
CategoryRecruitmentRemote Work
FoundedUnknown2016

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Metaview

  • Structured interview notes
  • ATS write-back
  • Sourcing agent
  • Application review agent
  • Intake call capture
  • Interviewer coaching
  • Assistant questions
  • Reports add-on

Only in Otter.ai

  • Automatic transcription
  • Real-time transcription
  • Speaker identification
  • Searchable transcripts
  • Highlights and summaries
  • Sharing
  • Mobile apps
  • Zoom

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Metaview

  • A talent team where hiring managers complain that interview feedback quality varies wildly between interviewers and nobody writes notes within a day of the callnot Otter.ai
  • An agency recruiter running back-to-back screens who needs a submittable candidate summary produced without an hour of typing afterwardsnot Otter.ai
  • A hiring process under scrutiny for consistency, where every interview needs the same competency evidence recorded in the same shapenot Otter.ai
  • A small in-house team using the sourcing agent to build a candidate list without paying for a separate sourcing platform seatnot Otter.ai

Otter.ai

  • Meeting transcription and recordingnot Metaview
  • Live transcription for accessibilitynot Metaview
  • Multi-language meeting supportnot Metaview

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Metaview

  • Pricing is per user per agent, so a five-person team using notetaking, sourcing and application review multiplies quickly; the visible 100 USD figure is one agent for one recruiter, not a team subscription.
  • Recording candidates triggers consent and data protection duties that vary by jurisdiction, and in the EU and two-party consent US states you must obtain and evidence agreement before recording, which adds a step to every interview and gives candidates a reason to decline.
  • An AI-generated summary of a hiring conversation is a discoverable record; if the summary mischaracterises what a candidate said, that document can surface in a discrimination or unfair rejection claim.
  • Note quality depends on audio quality and on interviewers running structured interviews in the first place; a rambling unstructured conversation produces a rambling unstructured summary, so the tool amplifies existing process rather than fixing it.
  • The advertised prices cover the sourcing agent specifically; pricing for the notetaker, application review and the all-agents bundle is not shown on the same page, so a buyer cannot total the cost of the configuration they actually want without a sales conversation.

Otter.ai

  • Two separate limits apply at once, a monthly minute allowance and a per conversation cap, so a long meeting can be cut short with allowance remaining
  • The free plan cuts off at 30 minutes per conversation and 300 minutes a month
  • The Pro plan still caps a single conversation at 90 minutes
  • Even unlimited plans cap a conversation at 4 hours
  • Imported file transcription has its own separate monthly limit, at 6,000 minutes on Business
  • Paying monthly rather than annually roughly doubles the rate, from $8.33 to $16.99 on Pro

Pricing, plan by plan

Metaview

Free
  • FreeFree
    • First 100 profiles sourced free
    • Unlimited concurrent searches
    • Full platform access
  • Pro$100/month
    • 200 profiles sourced per month
    • Unlimited concurrent searches
    • Assistant questions and note regenerations included
  • Max$300/month
    • Unlimited profiles sourced
    • Unlimited concurrent searches
    • Per user, per agent
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Custom volume and usage
    • Dedicated support and training
    • Enterprise security features

Otter.ai

Free
  • BasicFree
    • 300 monthly transcription minutes
    • 3 lifetime audio/video file imports
    • Zoom, MS Teams, Google Meet support
  • Pro$16.99/month
    • 1,200 in-app recording minutes
    • 10 monthly audio/video file imports
    • Up to 90 minutes per meeting
  • Pro Annual$8.33/month
    • 1,200 in-app recording minutes
    • 10 monthly audio/video file imports
    • Up to 90 minutes per meeting
  • Business$30/month
    • Unlimited meetings and in-app recordings
    • Unlimited audio/video file imports
    • Up to 4 hours per meeting

Which should you pick?

Choose Metaview if

  • You need structured interview notes.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Chrome extension.
  • You also want ats write-back.
Metaview review

Choose Otter.ai if

  • You need automatic transcription.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Mac.
  • You also want real-time transcription.
Otter.ai review

Questions people ask

Is Metaview or Otter.ai better?
Neither clearly leads. Metaview starts at Free and Otter.ai at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Metaview or Otter.ai?
Metaview starts at Free and Otter.ai at Free.
Does Metaview or Otter.ai run on more platforms?
Metaview runs on Web, Chrome extension. Otter.ai runs on Web, Ios, Android, Mac.
Can I use Metaview for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Metaview best used for?
Metaview is most often used for a talent team where hiring managers complain that interview feedback quality varies wildly between interviewers and nobody writes notes within a day of the call, an agency recruiter running back-to-back screens who needs a submittable candidate summary produced without an hour of typing afterwards, a hiring process under scrutiny for consistency, where every interview needs the same competency evidence recorded in the same shape, a small in-house team using the sourcing agent to build a candidate list without paying for a separate sourcing platform seat. Of those, a talent team where hiring managers complain that interview feedback quality varies wildly between interviewers and nobody writes notes within a day of the call and an agency recruiter running back-to-back screens who needs a submittable candidate summary produced without an hour of typing afterwards are not what Otter.ai is typically brought in for.
What can Metaview do that Otter.ai cannot?
Metaview covers Structured interview notes, ATS write-back, Sourcing agent, Application review agent. Otter.ai covers Automatic transcription, Real-time transcription, Speaker identification, Searchable transcripts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Metaview: What does Metaview cost?

The sourcing agent is free for the first 100 profiles, then 100 USD per user per month for Pro and 300 USD for Max. Other agents are priced separately and not all rates are published.

Otter.ai: What are the monthly transcription minute limits on Otter.ai plans?

Basic tier includes 300 monthly transcription minutes at no cost. Pro tier includes 1,200 in-app recording minutes. Business tier provides unlimited meetings and in-app recordings.

Source
Metaview: Do candidates have to consent to recording?

Yes, in the EU and in two-party consent US states. Metaview provides the capture; obtaining and recording consent remains your legal obligation.

Otter.ai: What meeting duration limits apply to different Otter.ai tiers?

Pro tier supports up to 90 minutes per meeting. Business tier supports up to 4 hours per meeting. Enterprise tier offers custom configurations.

Source
Metaview: Does it write back to my ATS?

Yes, to Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday and others, which is the main reason teams adopt it over a generic meeting recorder.

Otter.ai: How much can you save with Otter.ai annual billing?

Pro annual plan costs $8.33 per month (51% savings compared to $16.99 monthly). Business annual plan costs $19.99 per month (33% savings compared to $30 monthly).

Source
Metaview: Is it a replacement for an ATS?

No. It produces and files interview records. Requisitions, pipelines and offers stay in your applicant tracking system.

Otter.ai: What integrations are available with Otter.ai Pro plan?

Pro tier includes integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Zapier. Enterprise tier provides access to Otter API and custom webhooks.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Metaview

More on Otter.ai

Keep looking

Other head to heads