Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs Litmus Edge

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Litmus Edge
Manufacturing
Industrial edge platform that collects, normalises and forwards OT data to cloud and enterprise systems
- From
- $1500/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; Litmus Edge pricing is by site and data point, so a large tag count at one plant can cost more than a modest tag count spread over several, which is the opposite of how most manufacturers plan a rollout.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, Litmus Edge covers Prebuilt driver library.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and Litmus Edge actually diverge.
| Attribute | Augury | Litmus Edge |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1500/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per site by data point count |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, On-premise |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in Litmus Edge
- Prebuilt driver library
- Unified data model
- Litmus Edge Manager
- Edge applications
- Store and forward
- Cloud and broker outputs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot Litmus Edge
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot Litmus Edge
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot Litmus Edge
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot Litmus Edge
Litmus Edge
- A manufacturer with twenty plants and five PLC brands that needs one data acquisition standard rather than twenty bespoke integrationsnot Augury
- Feeding a cloud data warehouse or lakehouse with normalised production data without asking the controls team to write cloud connectorsnot Augury
- Retrofitting data collection onto old CNC machines and robots where the protocol support is the hard part, not the analyticsnot Augury
- Adding local buffering and computation at sites with unreliable WAN links so cloud outages do not create gaps in production historynot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
Litmus Edge
- Pricing is by site and data point, so a large tag count at one plant can cost more than a modest tag count spread over several, which is the opposite of how most manufacturers plan a rollout.
- The entry package sits around $1,500 per month, an awkward number for a single-site pilot given that the product is infrastructure with no visible output of its own until something downstream consumes it.
- Litmus does no analytics, so the business case always depends on a second purchase; the platform on its own produces no result a plant manager can see.
- Full pricing beyond the entry tier is not published and the Growth and Scale packages are quoted, so scaling costs are unknown at the point you commit to the architecture.
- A capable controls team can approximate a single-site deployment with an open-source broker and a driver gateway for a fraction of the cost, so the value case depends entirely on how many sites you are managing centrally.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
Litmus Edge
$1500/month- Foundation$1500/month
- Entry package sized by site count and data points
- Core driver library and edge runtime
- Store and forward to cloud and brokers
- Growth$undefined/month
- Larger site and data point allowance
- Litmus Edge Manager fleet management
- Priced on application
- Scale$undefined/month
- Enterprise multi-site deployment
- Higher data point ceilings and support tier
- Priced on application
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose Litmus Edge if
- You need prebuilt driver library.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want unified data model.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or Litmus Edge better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and Litmus Edge at $1500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or Litmus Edge?
- Augury starts at On request and Litmus Edge at $1500/month.
- Does Augury or Litmus Edge run on more platforms?
- Augury runs on Web, iOS, Android. Litmus Edge runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, On-premise.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what Litmus Edge is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that Litmus Edge cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. Litmus Edge covers Prebuilt driver library, Unified data model, Litmus Edge Manager, Edge applications.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
Litmus Edge: Does Litmus Edge do analytics or dashboards?
Only lightweight edge computation and basic visualisation. It is a data acquisition and normalisation layer; the analysis happens in whatever you send the data to.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
Litmus Edge: How is it priced?
By number of sites and number of data points, in packages. The entry package starts around $1,500 per month; larger tiers are quoted.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
Litmus Edge: Can it replace my historian?
No. It buffers and forwards but is not a long-term historian. Most deployments send data into a historian, warehouse or lakehouse.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
Litmus Edge: Does it need Litmus hardware?
No. It runs on standard industrial PCs, virtual machines or containers; there is no proprietary appliance requirement.
Related pages
More on Litmus Edge
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs Ignition
- Augury vs Sight Machine
- Augury vs Kepware Server
- Augury vs Fusion 360
- Augury vs Maintenance Connection
- Augury vs SolidWorks
- Augury vs Aras Innovator
- Augury vs Materialise Magics
- Augury vs Propel
- Augury vs Seeq
- Augury vs JobBOSS²
- Augury vs Markforged Eiger
- Litmus Edge vs KCF Technologies
- Litmus Edge vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Litmus Edge vs Sensemore
- Litmus Edge vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Litmus Edge vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Litmus Edge vs Erbessd Instruments
- Litmus Edge vs PROGNOST Systems
- Litmus Edge vs Petasense
- Litmus Edge vs MOVUS
- Litmus Edge vs Samotics
- Litmus Edge vs Poseidon Systems
- Litmus Edge vs eMaint
- Litmus Edge vs ABB 800xA
- Litmus Edge vs AVEVA System Platform
- Litmus Edge vs Hippo CMMS
- Litmus Edge vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Litmus Edge vs 3YOURMIND
- Litmus Edge vs AMFG
- Litmus Edge vs Ignition
- Litmus Edge vs Sight Machine
- Litmus Edge vs Kepware Server
- Litmus Edge vs Fusion 360
- Litmus Edge vs Maintenance Connection
- Litmus Edge vs SolidWorks
- Litmus Edge vs Aras Innovator
- Litmus Edge vs Materialise Magics
- Litmus Edge vs Propel
- Litmus Edge vs Seeq
- Litmus Edge vs JobBOSS²
- Litmus Edge vs Markforged Eiger
