Productivity · head to head
LibreOffice vs RowShare

LibreOffice
Productivity
Free and open-source office suite that runs entirely offline
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

RowShare
Productivity
Shared online table where each contributor sees only their own rows
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only LibreOffice has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: LibreOffice real-time collaborative editing is far behind Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and for teams who co-edit this alone usually decides the question; RowShare it is a table rather than a spreadsheet, so the formula and analysis capability people expect from Excel is not there, and anything requiring modelling or charting has to be exported and finished elsewhere.
- They diverge on capability: LibreOffice covers Full suite, RowShare covers Row-level permissions.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LibreOffice and RowShare actually diverge.
| Attribute | LibreOffice | RowShare |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Productivity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LibreOffice
- Full suite
- Works offline
- OpenDocument native
- Microsoft format support
- No telemetry or AI
- Extensions and macros
Only in RowShare
- Row-level permissions
- Column-level permissions
- Typed columns
- Forms
- Automatic reminders
- Microsoft Teams integration
- Zapier connections
- Excel import and export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LibreOffice
- Organisations where documents cannot leave the premises for policy or statutory reasonsnot RowShare
- Replacing per-seat office licences at scalenot RowShare
- Long-term archives needing a format not defined by a single vendornot RowShare
- Reviving older hardware that current commercial suites strainnot RowShare
RowShare
- Collecting a recurring return such as timesheets, budget lines or stock counts where contributors must not see each other's entries.not LibreOffice
- Replacing an emailed spreadsheet that one person consolidates by hand at the end of every month.not LibreOffice
- A shared list where some columns belong to the contributor and others are only for the administrator.not LibreOffice
- A structured departmental table inside Microsoft Teams that does not warrant a full database or a heavier platform licence.not LibreOffice
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LibreOffice
- Real-time collaborative editing is far behind Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and for teams who co-edit this alone usually decides the question
- Mobile support is weak, which is disqualifying for a workforce that reviews documents on phones
- Complex Microsoft Office documents still lose formatting in transit, so exchange-heavy workflows need testing with real files
- Central policy management, conditional access and audit tooling are thin against the commercial suites
- Advanced spreadsheet work is where the gap with Excel is widest, and it affects exactly the users least willing to change
RowShare
- It is a table rather than a spreadsheet, so the formula and analysis capability people expect from Excel is not there, and anything requiring modelling or charting has to be exported and finished elsewhere.
- It is a small independent product, so putting a recurring business process on it means a single vendor decision can end that process, and unlike the larger alternatives there is no ecosystem or partner network to fall back on.
- Integration is largely through Zapier rather than deep native connectors, which adds an intermediary service, another subscription and another place for a data flow to fail silently.
- The niche it occupies is increasingly covered by list tools included in Microsoft 365, so the purchase has to be justified against something the organisation may already be paying for and already administers.
- Licensing in this category is per user, so if contributors need accounts rather than form links, an occasional contributor costs the same per head as a daily one, and it is worth confirming which model applies before planning a rollout.
Pricing, plan by plan
LibreOffice
Free- LibreOfficeFree
- Full suite
- Commercial use permitted
- No per-seat licence
RowShare
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the RowShare review.
Which should you pick?
Choose LibreOffice if
- You need full suite.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want works offline.
Choose RowShare if
- You need row-level permissions.
- You also want column-level permissions.
Questions people ask
- Is LibreOffice or RowShare better?
- Neither clearly leads. LibreOffice starts at Free and RowShare at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LibreOffice or RowShare?
- LibreOffice has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for LibreOffice and On request for RowShare.
- Does LibreOffice or RowShare run on more platforms?
- LibreOffice runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. RowShare runs on Web.
- Can I use LibreOffice for free?
- Yes. LibreOffice has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. RowShare starts at On request.
- What is LibreOffice best used for?
- LibreOffice is most often used for organisations where documents cannot leave the premises for policy or statutory reasons, replacing per-seat office licences at scale, long-term archives needing a format not defined by a single vendor, reviving older hardware that current commercial suites strain. Of those, organisations where documents cannot leave the premises for policy or statutory reasons and replacing per-seat office licences at scale are not what RowShare is typically brought in for.
- What can LibreOffice do that RowShare cannot?
- LibreOffice covers Full suite, Works offline, OpenDocument native, Microsoft format support. RowShare covers Row-level permissions, Column-level permissions, Typed columns, Forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LibreOffice: Is LibreOffice really free for business use?
Yes. It is open source with no per-seat licence and no restriction on commercial use. The Document Foundation is funded by donations and sponsors.
RowShare: How is this different from a shared spreadsheet?
Sharing is per row rather than per file. Everyone works in one table, and each person sees only their own rows, which removes the consolidation step rather than speeding it up.
LibreOffice: Does it have AI features?
No. The 26.8 release states it contains no generative AI, that documents are not transmitted to remote services, and that no component requires network access.
RowShare: Can I get my data out?
Tables export to Excel and CSV, so the data itself moves. The permission structure, forms and reminders that made the process work do not, so an exit means rebuilding the workflow.
LibreOffice: Can it open Microsoft Office files?
Yes, and save back to them. Round-tripping complex documents is imperfect between any two suites, so test with your own files before committing to an exchange-heavy workflow.
RowShare: Is it a database?
No. It is a permissioned table with typed columns, not a relational store you can query, so it collects structured data rather than modelling it.
LibreOffice: Why do governments use it?
Two reasons: no per-seat cost at scale, and OpenDocument is an ISO standard implemented by more than one vendor, which matters for archives that must stay readable after a vendor relationship ends.
RowShare: Who is behind it?
A French vendor with named enterprise customers. It is a small company, so weigh continuity carefully before making it the home of a process you expect to run for years.
LibreOffice: What is the biggest reason not to use it?
Collaborative editing. If several people work on the same document simultaneously, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace are substantially better and that gap is not closing.
Related pages
More on LibreOffice
Other head to heads
- LibreOffice vs Google Workspace
- LibreOffice vs Microsoft 365
- LibreOffice vs Fastmail
- LibreOffice vs DeskTime
- LibreOffice vs Gamma
- LibreOffice vs Reflect
- LibreOffice vs Habitica
- LibreOffice vs DocuSeal
- LibreOffice vs Sejda
- LibreOffice vs tldraw
- LibreOffice vs WPS Office
- LibreOffice vs Alfred
- LibreOffice vs SignWell
- LibreOffice vs Ulysses
- LibreOffice vs Anvil
- LibreOffice vs Xmind
- LibreOffice vs Todoist
- LibreOffice vs OmniFocus 3
- LibreOffice vs Brain.fm
- LibreOffice vs Things 3
- LibreOffice vs Google Slides
- LibreOffice vs Rows
- LibreOffice vs Milanote
- LibreOffice vs Mimestream
- LibreOffice vs Bring!
- LibreOffice vs Bluedot
- LibreOffice vs FigJam
- LibreOffice vs Tana
- LibreOffice vs Time Doctor
- LibreOffice vs Bear
- LibreOffice vs Bear Notes
- LibreOffice vs BoldSign
- RowShare vs Google Workspace
- RowShare vs Microsoft 365
- RowShare vs Fastmail
- RowShare vs DeskTime
- RowShare vs Gamma
- RowShare vs Reflect
- RowShare vs Habitica
- RowShare vs DocuSeal
- RowShare vs Sejda
- RowShare vs tldraw
- RowShare vs WPS Office
- RowShare vs Alfred
- RowShare vs SignWell
- RowShare vs Ulysses
- RowShare vs Anvil
- RowShare vs Xmind
- RowShare vs Todoist
- RowShare vs OmniFocus 3
- RowShare vs Brain.fm
- RowShare vs Things 3
- RowShare vs Google Slides
- RowShare vs Rows
- RowShare vs Milanote
- RowShare vs Mimestream
- RowShare vs Bring!
- RowShare vs Bluedot
- RowShare vs FigJam
- RowShare vs Tana
- RowShare vs Time Doctor
- RowShare vs Bear
- RowShare vs Bear Notes
- RowShare vs BoldSign
